McRanger92
Registered User
- Jun 7, 2017
- 14,269
- 26,592
x.com
x.com
Still think nyr should try and add foegle. Can be a similar acquisition to when they first got vatrano. Could be cheap a player to add since edm is trying to clear space to add higher salaried players like fl was trying to do w/giroux.
I know the whole Tarasenko-retention topic is kinda polarising but Seravalli now confirms it as well.
I like Foegele but he is a left wing and really not a top 6 guy in an ideal world.
he would be tied for 3rd with Lafreniere in ES scoring on this team.I like Foegele but he is a left wing and really not a top 6 guy in an ideal world.
he would be tied for 3rd with Lafreniere in ES scoring on this team.
He can play right. And he is not intended to be a top 6 guy. He can sub in when necessary, but Kakko should be in that spot. He's better than all of the realistic options being discussed (i.e., we're not getting Buchnevich, Guentzel, etc.).
You move Kakko up, run with a bottom 6 of:
Cuylle/Vesey-Wennberg-Foegele
Cuylle/Vesey-Brodzinski-Goodrow/Edstrom
Way more time with Draisaitl than McDavid.He plays with McDavid doesnt he?
As stated in the tweet, edm needs to shed salary if they want to add a top line wing like Buch or guentz since they barely have any cap space. Florida did the same thing when they traded vat to nyr so they could acquire giroux and kulakWhy would Edmonton trade him ?
Ufa sure next year
Sparingly - they have 91 minutes together at 5 on 5 this year.He plays with McDavid doesnt he?
Kakko isnt a top 6 guy either. They need a guy who can score up there. Doesnt need to be Buch or Guentzel but Eberle, Vatrano and Zucker even are better options because they can actually put the puck in the net. Im sure there are other guys I'm missing.
Way more time with Draisaitl than McDavid.
The point is it doesn't really matter who he plays with - he has been a net positive on pretty much any line. Perfect for a depth guy. He's a better fit than Vatrano likely for half the cost.
Vatrano is not a better option. Zucker hasn't been a top 6 guy in like 6 years. He has 1 more goal than Kakko. Eberle is ok I guess?He plays with McDavid doesnt he?
Kakko isnt a top 6 guy either. They need a guy who can score up there. Doesnt need to be Buch or Guentzel but Eberle, Vatrano and Zucker even are better options because they can actually put the puck in the net. Im sure there are other guys I'm missing.
Vatrano is not a better option. Zucker hasn't been a top 6 guy in like 6 years. He has 1 more goal than Kakko. Eberle is ok I guess?
If Kakko/Foegele fail in the top 6 spot, then you look to make a bigger move in the summer. You don't throw around a bunch of firsts+ to get waiver king Frank Vatrano.
View attachment 827612
Good scouting report on Foegele here as well:
![]()
Tampa Bay Lightning Trade Deadline: Warren Foegele
Today we explore forward Warren Foegele of the Edmonton Oilers as a potential Tampa Bay Lightning trade deadline target.lastwordonsports.com
The most surprising statistic of his profile is his high-danger passing. Foegele places in the 83rd percentile of high-danger passes per 60. His passing statistics have skyrocketed compared to years past.
They could use a forward who has solid forechecking and 5 on 5 metrics
Why would Edmonton trade him ?
Ufa sure next year
I’m not surprised if he signs next year with NYR though
That doesn't work when you're talking about LTIR because LTIR can't be banked.Aren’t the salaries prorated in which the salary being acquired isn’t the full hit? Forgive me as the cap is just another animal
go get Foegele and Zucker for mid picks. done. adds truculence, forechecking, physicality, and skill.
That would be great. For all this talk about how "everyone wants to play here" we never really see players sign here at a discount (No, Panarin doesn't count. 11.6m is not a discount).
Tarasenko signing here for 2.5m would be considered a discount. Let's hope it happens.
I don't like it any more than you do to be honest but I think we just wind up living with Brod at center. really don't want a Nico Sturm type especially with Goodrow stapled to the lineup and I personally don't have a better realistic idea.I like that idea but we're one center injury away from Brodzinski in the top 6. We need to add at least one guy who can take a faceoff who isnt a borderline AHL player.