jay from jersey
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2008
- 6,383
- 4,726
This….I don't really agree. I don't think Gus should be making 4m. Zac Jones aint perfect, but he's shown he belongs at this point and provides many similar traits. I like the depth Gus brings us, but he's 3rd pair D for us. We need those 3rd pair D to be under 3m a year. Just like we need our bottom 6 to be under 3m a year as well -- See Barclay Goodrow. It's just the nature of roster construction nowadays.
Also, Stralman was far better in his own zone than Gus and made far fewer gaffs.
If we can bring back Gus on a short 2 year deal at under 3m, I'd consider it. But I'm not too excited about going over 2m for him.
And I was a huge Stralman fan and was really ticked when we let him walk.
I know lots love Gus. He’s having a real solid season….
But don’t forget, he benefits greatly from playing in Lavs system prior…
For the rest of the D it’s all their 1st year running it…
Gus had a great year or 2 with hawks, then Calgary gave him a big deal and regretted it…
He’s a 3rd pair system guy, that can fill up in a pinch and not look out of place.
Having him in top 4 with heavy minutes against other teams best won’t go well.
It’s also not good cap management to spend 4-5 mill on any 3rd pairing player. You pay the horses…
The guys who play top minutes and largely all situations.
Odds are they’ll sign a vet for 2.5-3mill per and run him with a young player/prospect that’s making his way up.
That’s how a majority of the league does it.
I would love him to stay on a manageable deal because he’s been excellent all year for us….
I think he’ll be exposed in a prolonged top 4 role though