lakeshirts37
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2019
- 1,619
- 1,701
Isnt it a little early to be drunk?Rather give up Othmann than Robertson.
Isnt it a little early to be drunk?Rather give up Othmann than Robertson.
Rather give up Othmann than Robertson.
I think Wennberg was the “easier” decision/move to make. The top 6 winger will require more evaluation and maneuveringDrury bringing in Wennberg points to adding the center depth they need as the first priority to set up the next move.
Wennberg is flexible and can also move up to play with Mika on the right if they strike out on another RW deal, but I think the hold up is they need enough room to be able to get that guy, whoever he is.
Wennberg can play a solid possession game and that would fit in well with Cuylle and Kakko if they can find that other winger. That makes the forward lineup stronger and allows them have some real depth and roll 4 lines which is what you want to do in the grind of the playoffs.
I think Wennberg was the “easier” decision/move to make. The top 6 winger will require more evaluation and maneuvering
Yeah, get this deal out of the way and try to make the money work to allow another deal with a certain set of other RWs you've identified as targets.I think Wennberg was the “easier” decision/move to make. The top 6 winger will require more evaluation and maneuvering
Unlikely you can get someone better for that 2nd rounder this TDL - and unlikely the player used with that pick will be an impact NHL player. If he is, we’re talking 3-4 years away.But it’s not a middle pick! What’s being said is a 2nd rounder plus. He isn’t worth that
This…. But everything has a cause and effect…. NYR signing Kreider/not resigning Fast/ drafting Kakko and LaF were all factors…The Rangers have had a massive hole at RW since the Buchnevich trade. The existence of young wingers =/= depth on the wings.
This…. But everything has a cause and effect…. NYR signing Kreider/not resigning Fast/ drafting Kakko and LaF were all factors…The Rangers have had a massive hole at RW since the Buchnevich trade. The existence of young wingers =/= depth on the wings.
But I'm with you that it doesn't need to be a ppg kind guy. Doesnt need to be a flashy name or hot scorer like Vatrano.I think the top-6 winger also has more options. That very well could be a wait and see who is available last minute for little cost
But I'm with you that it doesn't need to be a ppg kind guy. Doesnt need to be a flashy name or hot scorer like Vatrano.
They need a competent even strength player who can produce, but they dont have the sell the farm for it.
The defense has its warts and you arent going to be able to solve that puzzle this deadline. Deepen the team up front so you can spread out the TOI
Exactly. People keep saying this and that won't move the needle. This team is already top 5 in the league. The addition of quality NHL forwards in positions of need will help a good deal more than people want to believe.But I'm with you that it doesn't need to be a ppg kind guy. Doesnt need to be a flashy name or hot scorer like Vatrano.
They need a competent even strength player who can manage the puck and produce, but they dont have the sell the farm for it.
The defense has its warts and you arent going to be able to solve that puzzle this deadline. Deepen the team up front so you can spread out the TOI and hopefully provide a little spark to the bromance.
Even if that line and the 4th increase EV production by 15% thats a huge plus.
This. Not so much about finding the flashiest/highest profile winger, but the right one…
Panarin has played excellent all year, but tro and Lafs effort /tenacity has def rubbed off on him…
That’s the type of guy they need to get to get Mika and kreids more involved…
Mika isn’t going anywhere. At least for a while.
NYR is far better served getting him back to playing more involved they paying to find a taker and praying he waives his NMC
I don't disagree, I've been pretty adamant about Robertson + middle pick
Side note -
I was reading today that Dumoulin has had a rough transition from Pittsburgh to Seattle. He signed a 2 year deal worth $3.15m last off-season so he has another year left. Would Seattle consider Wennberg + Dumoulin for Goodrow + 2nd + Robertson? Perhaps the Rangers retain a bit on Goodrow?
weren't there a lot of deals going down well before the TDL last year?
I mean not even one small trade lately and we are pretty much 3 days from TDL?
Dumba is Done-ba. He hasn't been good in 5 years. Honestly suggesting him should be ban worthy.I think Drury is going to try again before Friday. If the cost is Schneider+, they should pull the trigger and add Sean Walker or Matt Dumba in a separate deal. Sign Pesce of deMelo in the summer. Buffalo is a very stupid organization so they may not discuss it based on some misguided stance that they can't deal with the Rangers, but Drury should at least exhaust the possibility.
I disagree.It's wild to see how peoples opinions are so different in here.
But I'm with you that it doesn't need to be a ppg kind guy. Doesnt need to be a flashy name or hot scorer like Vatrano.
They need a competent even strength player who can manage the puck and produce, but they dont have the sell the farm for it.
The defense has its warts and you arent going to be able to solve that puzzle this deadline. Deepen the team up front so you can spread out the TOI and hopefully provide a little spark to the bromance.
Even if that line and the 4th increase EV production by 15% thats a huge plus.
Dumba is Done-ba. He hasn't been good in 5 years. Honestly suggesting him should be ban worthy.
I disagree.
Yeah but then there would likely be no deal because of the position he plays and especially with some retention likely. Hope you like Brodzinski in the playoffs. Teams have to trade within certain trade parameters that have been set this year. The goal is to get better within reason. You are downplaying the cost.Agreed, paying a 2nd rounder is not a middling pick. Should be 4th and Robertson for Wennberg.