Since he became a permanent fixture in the lineup in 2013-14, he's 35th in overall scoring and 17th among wingers. Yeah... he's a Top 30 winger.
http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/last-4-nhl-seasons-players-stats.html
Since he became a permanent fixture in the lineup in 2013-14, he's 35th in overall scoring and 17th among wingers. Yeah... he's a Top 30 winger.
http://www.quanthockey.com/nhl/seasons/last-4-nhl-seasons-players-stats.html
And, since there are 30 teams, that puts him as a "top line winger" as well. Not a guy you give away as a UFA.
Or maybe he never gets an extended look because he is bad there.
Just a thought.
How can you tell if he is bad there if he is never given a real opportunity? One or two games every several months really doesn't tell you anything.
I know it won't happen but Soderberg is the odd man out in CO and they could use a D like Staal. On paper Staal makes 1 million more and has an extra year on the deal so Rangers like have to eat a bit
Maybe, but our genius coaching staff obviously hasn’t seen him enough to keep him there. There also is even less evidence that he is good there.
And with our luck, it’d be Pittsburgh or NJI really can't imagine Zucc playing for another team.
Not that I agree with this, because I think the team needs McDonagh, but if Skjei takes a massive step forward this year, I'm curious if they listen to offers on McDonagh during the summer
I don't know what team would trade for him that needs him and is close to winning. The Jets need a LHD but they aren't close to winning
Maybe St Louis but I don't think they have anything interesting enough to entice me personally.
Also don't know what the package would look like
I'd want a forward that is ready to play, and a 1st round pick to start with. A lot of good D in this upcoming draft
But I want McDonagh to stay so the point is kinda moot![]()
We are talking about in two years. The guy is right now at his prime, might not be the case in two years.
And we just gave away a guy who probably ranks the same at his position in the NHL as Zucc, a lot here had no problem with it. That guy was also much younger.
Maybe, but our genius coaching staff obviously hasn’t seen him enough to keep him there. There also is even less evidence that he is good there.
I recon that you should never say never, but with Shatty/TDA/Pionk on the right for years to come we must have defensively capable LDs. Preferably with some experience. McD just makes too much sense in that perspective.
It was one thing when we had a defensive right side too, we could like have kept Yandle and Skjei on the left and acquired a top player for McD. I.e. in a sense levered a McD move by acquiring an offensive LD which are easier to come by than a RD. With that logic gone, with the infusion of good looking young players into the system -- that requires some veteran leadership -- I just think the odds for finding something that makes enough sense right not is very low.
I think McD, Skjei, Ziba, Kreider and co are staying put. Zucc was one of few that showed up in the POs, who led the way.
Hayes? I think many at this place underrated him, don't really acknowledge the limitations you also get with that size. Attributes it to lazyness or whatever. I don't think we are concerned about a logjam at center. I am not a fan of Hayes on the wing, but Zib is basically a natural winger. Lias can definitely play on the wing. I like Chytil at center, but a kid like him can definitely play a few years on the wing. I am of the school that you can never have too many centers, think they are more versatile than wingers and that a line with two center capable players on it play better. Becomes more well rounded. I don't think we are eager to trade Hayes looking over the next couple of years.
I am also not quite sure what we would be looking for in a trade.
One scenario -- I kind of like -- would be to within a time frame of say 6-18 months deal one of Pionk and DeAngelo along with forward for a top RD preferably with some size. In that case I would look at Miller as a sweetener if a real price could be had. You know like STL for some reason I can't understand would consider moving Parayko, Tony D and JT Miller for Parayko.
In short I think it's a deal you can leverage because it's not optimal to have three smaller RDs like Shatty, TDA and Pionk, deal one of TDA and Pionk to get a RD with size you open up a spotfor the other.
I would like the mix of our blueline better if it was like:
McD-Shatty
Skjei-Big RD like a Parayko/Mason
Graves/BG-Pionk/TDA
I recon that you should never say never, but with Shatty/TDA/Pionk on the right for years to come we must have defensively capable LDs. Preferably with some experience. McD just makes too much sense in that perspective.
More like 36, and I'm more willing to take Zuccarello into his late 30's than I am McDonagh.
I have a feeling I’m going to regret this, but who are the 20 defensemen in this league right now better than McD?
38.
He's 30 now and under contract for this year and next.
I'll bring up his name again: would CBJ move Sedlak?
With Girardi as a partner, McDonagh is one of half of the worst pair since the lockout.
I'm already giving him the benefit of the doubt on that.
Stepan seems to be doing well out here in Arizona - I'm happy for him. Looking forward to seeing him play in person a few times.
Are you calling McDonagh - Girardi pairing the worst pairing in the NHL since the lockout?