BULL SHIT
Peep the numbers.
Peep fox’s 5v5 production.
It’s on point. Lindgren cannot play on a top
Pair.
BULL SHIT
It's not bullshit. Fox's offensive driving is starting to tank significantly at even strength. As soon as he's on the powerplay away from Lindgren, he's normal again.BULL SHIT
Norris winner. Then runner-up. Surely Fox’ partner was hurting him.Peep the numbers.
Peep fox’s 5v5 production.
It’s on point. Lindgren cannot play on a top
Pair.
Eddie Olzyck was asked tonight what he thought of the Rangers."I'd keep an eye on Will Cuylle. He scored again tonight he just has a real nose for the net in an old school way. I'm seeing a Jarome Iginla type player."After a pause: "Maybe better"High praise
He wasn't. Now he is. Things change and develop as time passes.Norris winner. Then runner-up. Surely Fox’ partner was hurting him.
Norris winner. Then runner-up. Surely Fox’ partner was hurting him.
Hasn’t even been half of the season. I’d be patient and count on a turnaround rather than going for a hasty trigger pull on a trade. Nothing new here. Most fans are are in what have you done for me lately mode with their takes.He wasn't. Now he is. Things change and develop as time passes.
He is his normal self in every category but even strength production.Hasn’t even been half of the season. I’d be patient and count on a turnaround rather than going for a hasty trigger pull on a trade. Nothing new here. Most fans are are in what have you done for me lately mode with their takes.
PS I also don’t get how it’s not obvious to everyone that Fox is not his normal self since coming back from an injury.
Sorry, I’m lost. Was Lindgren hurting Fox during his Norris level seasons or just so far this season?He is his normal self in every category but even strength production.
They've been together almost exclusively their entire careers. The notion that an assessment of the pair is hasty just doesn't hold any water.
Both.Sorry, I’m lost. Was Lindgren hurting Fox during his Norris level seasons or just so far this season?
You’re using PP metrics as a base for what Fox’s 5v5 metrics should be? In what universe does that make sense?It's not bullshit. Fox's offensive driving is starting to tank significantly at even strength. As soon as he's on the powerplay away from Lindgren, he's normal again.
Fox is an all-world defender on his own. There's nothing about Lindgren's game that enables him. The only thing it accomplishes is pushing the whole left side down which is great for depth but it becomes not worth it if Fox is less than himself.
His offensive production is normal on the powerplay, which flies in the face of the idea that Fox is hurt or having a down year. What about that doesn't make sense?You’re using PP metrics as a base for what Fox’s 5v5 metrics should be? In what universe does that make sense?
PP where 4 out of 5 pieces excluding Fox are having a career or close to years? Yeah it makes plenty of sense. Take a look at a few random games from last season if you don’t see that Fox is not his usual self.His offensive production is normal on the powerplay, which flies in the face of the idea that Fox is hurt or having a down year. What about that doesn't make sense?
You keep talking about Fox having career years with Lindgren as if he's ever had anything but career years.PP where 4 out of 5 pieces excluding Fox are having a career or close to years? Yeah it makes plenty of sense. Take a look at a few random games from last season if you don’t see that Fox is not his usual self.
Now who’s moving goal posts? Being “terrible at offense” is not the same as “hurting Fox (and by implication the team’s chances of winning), and yes I’m fine with Lindgren’s offensive shortcoming (as I would put it) because of other considerations.Lindgren always dragged his team's offense. It's a freezing cold take. It's a legitimate concern because he's out there with, not just Fox, but all of our best forwards a lot too.
Like, that's a statement of fact. The point of contention is how ok you are with it.
As people see we have an opportunity to win, which is very hard and requires just about a hole-less roster, more and more people are saying "you know, maybe I'm not ok with our #2 defenseman being terrible at offense."
You can disagree with that, but I don't see what's funny or crazy about it.
Why does it have to have anything to do with Fox? Some people want to upgrade on Lindgren. The argument against that seems to be that the partnership improves Fox. I can assure you it does not.Weird to blame Lindgren for the lack of Fox's 5v5 offense when the only actual difference is he is individually shooting 0% (6.1% career) and while on ice the team is shooting 5.5% (9.1% career). Lindgren may be a problem but the Fox's 5v5 offense deficiencies is just pure bad fortune than anything to do with him. He actually has his career high CG60 and 2nd best xGF60 this year
Being terrible at offense hurts your teammates, believe it or not.Now who’s moving goal posts? Being “terrible at offense” is not the same as “hurting Fox (and by implication the team’s chances of winning), and yes I’m fine with Lindgren’s offensive shortcoming (as I would put it) because of other considerations.
Logic. Your implication is that without Lindgren Fox would have even more careerest year.You keep talking about Fox having career years with Lindgren as if he's ever had anything but career years.
LeBron James had a career year with the 42-40 2005 Cavs because the guy's had 20 career years.