Thats ok because these folks are trying to trade for Hanifin or Chychrun with funny money.Issue is that I don’t think Miller or Gus are good Fox partners.
Thats ok because these folks are trying to trade for Hanifin or Chychrun with funny money.Issue is that I don’t think Miller or Gus are good Fox partners.
Analogy. Lundqvist as a goalie wasn’t good at offense compared to other goalies so yes - he was hurting team’s chances of winning.Being terrible at offense hurts your teammates, believe it or not.
That's the worst analogy a human being made in 2023 and I'm impressed by how you got it in under the wire.Analogy. Lundqvist as a goalie wasn’t good at offense compared to other goalies so yes - he was hurting team’s chances of winning.
Personally, I never forgave him for that.Analogy. Lundqvist as a goalie wasn’t good at offense compared to other goalies so yes - he was hurting team’s chances of winning.
Much like goaltenders, defensive defensemen aren’t relied on for their offense.That's the worst analogy a human being made in 2023 and I'm impressed by how you got it in under the wire.
His cap hit sure hurt the team’s chance of winning though. That’s why they should trade Igor in the offseasonAnalogy. Lundqvist as a goalie wasn’t good at offense compared to other goalies so yes - he was hurting team’s chances of winning.
Yeah, I was pretty sure you wouldn’t see it.That's the worst analogy a human being made in 2023 and I'm impressed by how you got it in under the wire.
No, but they should be able to do it at an NHL level, even if it's a bad NHL level.Much like goaltenders, defensive defensemen aren’t relied on for their offense.
One crisis at a time.His cap hit sure hurt the team’s chance of winning though. That’s why they should trade Igor in the offseason
How many crises do you think this team is having?One crisis at a time.
I don't know, but I'm just not touching that one until it happens.How many crises do you think this team is having?
https://x.com/nyr_pr/status/1741289560041013565?s=46&t=WWGwhyQiVsqtB6-tfs442w
Iginla 46 yo now tho.Kinda an outrageous comment. "Maybe better".. maybe you could make a playstyle comparison, but other than that... Iginla is a hall of famer with a few +90 point NHL seasons and demolished juniors, Cuylle could still have some upside from here but I don't see that being anywhere near realistic
Yes. Cap tight this season but should be some flexibility going forward it there's a player they wish to keep longer term.Agreed. If I’m giving up a first we might as well go for someone younger who we could resign or has term
I agree with you on defenseman being either offensive or defensive is reductive.I hate boiling pairs down to an offense guy and a defense guy. Players are more nuanced than that. The only thing I hate more is goalies.
Regardless, even if you're going to do that, I find it extremely dubious to suggest that Fox needs a defensive defenseman.
There's an argument to be made that Fox is the best defender in the league. He's not, conventionally, an offensive defensman. He doesn't take a ton of risks or jump into an inordinate amount of rushes. He certainly doesn't skate well. Most of his 5v5 production is happenstance as a result of being a flawless positional defender.
Fox, imo, would be even better with a partner who can and does rush up the ice. Even if that's not the case, he sure as shit doesn't need a babysitter. He doesn't play that type of offensive game.
Has Lindgren hurt Fox thus far and throughout their time to together as a pairing? I guess that’s up for debate. But I don’t think it’s insane to think that if you could find a partner who is perhaps more proficient with the puck that Fox’s results could be even better. I know it’s hard to comprehend but there are pairings in the NHL that are even better than Lindgren-Fox have been in terms of play driving.
In an ideal world it would be getting someone better than Trouba because that pairing has been underwhelming for years now but that is much more unlikely than the idea of Lindgren being dealt. I guess they could upgrade Schneider but I’m not sure it would be worth it Tbh.I think it would be overkill. Fox already produces. If we got a defenseman I’d rather spread them out and have more time on ice with someone good.
Schneider is the same age as laf, and as he continues to fill out will be alot better than he currently is.In an ideal world it would be getting someone better than Trouba because that pairing has been underwhelming for years now but that is much more unlikely than the idea of Lindgren being dealt. I guess they could upgrade Schneider but I’m not sure it would be worth it Tbh.
I think he’s made improvements this season and he’s getting good results with Gustafsson So I wouldn’t touch that pairing. But if there’s one area on D that could in theory be upgraded and that has more than a subzero chance of happening that might be it.Schneider is the same age as laf, and as he continues to fill out will be alot better than he currently is.
The problem is that he’s not really producing this year 5v5 and he’d possibly benefit from a partner who doesn’t do things like thisI think it would be overkill. Fox already produces. If we got a defenseman I’d rather spread them out and have more time on ice with someone good.