No not every team, especially the good ones. There are rosters that have centers on the wing. Vegas has a bunch of centers or guys that have played center at the NHL level that are on the wing. We do not have those. We have centers and we have wingers. Obviously Panarin isn't playing center, but Lafreniere hasn't, Kreider takes some draws, but doesn't play C. The guy that has done it is Wheeler, but at this stage of his career, I do not think that is an option.
If you are a good team and franchise, you have options to move guys down the middle in the event of an injury. Someone in the top 6 played center and moved to wing and can do it for a period of time. This team does not. We're two guys capable of being a middle 6 center away from being in those spots. in 2023, Nick Bonino is not a viable option as next man up for 3C and there is no young center that you want to give a shot to either.
When the Devils lost Hughes and Hischier, they had Mercer, Haula, and McLeod. Those are not world beaters, but Haula blows away anyone we have after our top 3 and McLeod is an upgrade on them. Carolina minus Aho+Kotka and they'd still have Necas/Staal/Drury. Someone slides over and takes the middle.
The issue isn't that those options as 1-3Cs are not ideal, but the Rangers might have the worst organizational C depth around the league, at least of the playoff teams. At least there are options coming on RW, there is next to nothing for C. Bryce McConnell-Barker is the only guy that stands out, maybe Korczak, as a young center in the organization, and only one of them can be called up.
This is the reason people want someone like Lindholm, Gourde, Henrique, etc instead of adding a RW as a deadline candidate. We can move Chytil out there, you could play one of these guys out there. We added Copp that played center and filled in at times, but was on the wing with Strome and Panarin. You need versatility over 82 games. This team as constructed is missing a lot of that.
sorry to hearYou're reading too much into it.
When my mom passed or other relatives got sick, she didn't un-die and people didn't get over cancer in three days.
*I* started feeling better about it as time passed.
Obviously, we have no idea, but it's a statement that makes perfect sense to me.
Get a center that can play right wing. This is not a difficult operation. It can be a RW that has been a center before. I do not care about the order of operations. We need another forward and one that can play center while being a RW option is the best bet.We're already weak at RW. If one gets hurt then it's even worse. Center is fine.
Lindholm is a big part of the post you were replying to.
Get a center that can play right wing. This is not a difficult operation. It can be a RW that has been a center before. I do not care about the order of operations. We need another forward and one that can play center while being a RW option is the best bet.
And for a team with big asperations, I'm prioritizing that this person is a center that can play wing before the opposite.
I hear you. And I'm not saying KK is untouchable, just that selling low on him, whether part of a package or not, is bad business. I mean its hard to say whether the deal is a good one or not unless we can see the deal. Hahaha. My point is unless you are getting at LEAST the trade value of a defensively excellent 40 point winger, you're selling low on him. I don't mean him PLUS for that winger/value, I'm saying that is HIS value as part of the package. And I honestly don't think you can get that value for him while injured off of his offensively worst start to a season.Zibs was basically as good or better than Brassard right from the start so that was a really good trade for us. To put it in terms of that Branch Rickey quote it was us trading the player (29 year old Brassard) 1 season too soon instead of 1 season too late.
I'm not looking to give KK away but if KK needs to be part of a package to get a top line forward or a top line Dman I'm open to it. We need top line players more than 40 point players in my opinion.
Back to back games every weekend of the month, 6 weeks in a row and 9 out of 10 weeks.Bro wtf is up with our schedule
I really like Chytil but my concern is each time he has this head injury, the perception that he will have future issues increases. If this injury happens again will it be too late to entertain a trade?I want a healthy Chytil back for the rest of the season and playoffs.
Thats my Rangers Christmas wish.
Thank you Santa
![]()
Crazy to be desperate during the first team slump after a great start. Schneider's so young still for a D. Jones has gotten very little actual playing time in the NHL. Yet so many are ready to toss them and look at the next option.Desperation I guess. Everyone has seen enough of Jones.
It fits if Cal retains 50% this year. After we win the cup who cares about next year.How does that fit under the cap this or any year afterwards
If I fit in a trade For Broberg would that change your mind?
My comment only had to do with who replaces Miller should he be out again, Robertson or Jones. Don't know why you jumped to SchneiderCrazy to be desperate during the first team slump after a great start. Schneider's so young still for a D. Jones has gotten very little actual playing time in the NHL. Yet so many are ready to toss them and look at the next option.
Also Chytil never comes back and plays well.I really like Chytil but my concern is each time he has this head injury, the perception that he will have future issues increases. If this injury happens again will it be too late to entertain a trade?
I hope that isn't the case. Good guy but I'm concerned for his future.Also Chytil never comes back and plays well.
He always looks lost for months after returning.
Himmy Vesey injured in practice? Hit by a puck that ricocheted off the cross bar?
Guess who’s back, guess who’s back, guess who’s back , guess who’s back…
concurI hear you. And I'm not saying KK is untouchable, just that selling low on him, whether part of a package or not, is bad business. I mean its hard to say whether the deal is a good one or not unless we can see the deal. Hahaha. My point is unless you are getting at LEAST the trade value of a defensively excellent 40 point winger, you're selling low on him. I don't mean him PLUS for that winger/value, I'm saying that is HIS value as part of the package. And I honestly don't think you can get that value for him while injured off of his offensively worst start to a season.
Also, Zib was about 10 points per 80 games less than Brass the two years prior to the trade, but had a better year than Brass immediately following the trade.
no...
If I fit in a trade For Broberg would that change your mind?
Yeah it will be too late, but the real question is are you really going to get fair value for him at this point? When would that be?I really like Chytil but my concern is each time he has this head injury, the perception that he will have future issues increases. If this injury happens again will it be too late to entertain a trade?