so we increase the likelihood our team has cap issues? No thanks.
You wouldn’t pay fair market for a 22 23 year old top pairing LD for this club? I absolutely would. You’re going to move on from Tony and Strome this is where to spend your money
so we increase the likelihood our team has cap issues? No thanks.
I think I’ve said it here a few times but a deal around lundkvist and Sergachev makes a lot of sense for both teams. Regardless of how much you like Lundkvist he will be the third right d man here. He won’t play ahead of Trouba and Fox. I personally rather have a guy like Schneider in that 5/6 spot. Lundkvist is a top prospect no question but sometimes you have to move guys if you have a surplus to fill a need and Sergachev would be a great get there.
And for this reason DeAngelo will be gone in a matter of time whether it’s now(don’t think so) next year or the year after as well if he’s not moving to the left side.
Hajek's game from the CHL has not translated all that well to the pros. He has very good puck and skating skills but the offensive component of his game has disappeared. The Rangers I don't think were looking at him being solely a defensive defenseman. IMO he still has things to figure out.
A guy like Colin Wilsson for a bargain bin contract under 900 k per would not be a bad idea. He would be a bit of a gamble considering his recent injury history. But... he also plays both C and wing and is still not that old (31 in 6 days). Is a certified NHLer though - with some character - that might offset losing Quickie a bit. 632 games, 286 points, decent size, PKer...outta the NYR preferred Northeast USA hockey schools and a BU alumni guy (seems to fit The Mighty Quinn’s preference in every which way). Could be an upgrade providing depth over our signed tweeners that does not break the camels cap back. I have heard that name thrown around a bit. He will likely go late, dirt cheap as the UFA situation looks now. Colorado looks like they have moved on when glancing at their current fwd roster...
I think I’ve said it here a few times but a deal around lundkvist and Sergachev makes a lot of sense for both teams. Regardless of how much you like Lundkvist he will be the third right d man here. He won’t play ahead of Trouba and Fox. I personally rather have a guy like Schneider in that 5/6 spot. Lundkvist is a top prospect no question but sometimes you have to move guys if you have a surplus to fill a need and Sergachev would be a great get there.
And for this reason DeAngelo will be gone in a matter of time whether it’s now(don’t think so) next year or the year after as well if he’s not moving to the left side.
I know it's not really fair of me to say this before doing a deep dive into the stats, but I'm immediately skeptical of a stat that says a player who hasn't played a single NHL game is providing twice as much value as Jacob Trouba.
it doesn't say that. it's a projection based on their estimated NHL impact. Trouba's number value was hurt because he had, by far, his worst season as a pro this year statistically.I know it's not really fair of me to say this before doing a deep dive into the stats, but I'm immediately skeptical of a stat that says a player who hasn't played a single NHL game is providing twice as much value as Jacob Trouba.
Too many additional moves in this chess game.
There are cap issues so you are helping the Lightning. You’re giving them a cheap talent while the Rangers get a more expensive talent.
there are moves that need to be made regardless. Strome, DeAngelo (eventually) Buchnevich next year these question marks aren’t going away.
I think I would rather have Lundkvist on an ELC for 3 years than have to pay Sergachev when he has been in a sheltered bubble. Don't get me wrong, I'd still probably take a chance on Sergachev, but not for Lundkvist.
I would also hope the Rangers have internally acknowledged that Trouba's NMC goes away just as Lundkvist's ELC would be expiring. That is very good timing if Trouba isn't what you hoped he would be, such that you could pay Lundkvist and have him and Fox slot up on the right side. You could trade out of Trouba's contract at that point.
To the cap experts:
Hypothetically, lets say at the start of the year you are over the cap due to rookie bonuses but by the halfway point of the season you eliminate enough bonuses to hit $2m below the ceiling.
Do you calculate the cap space to the start of the year or do you only get credit from the point you got under?
I guess just less efficacy/results. Datsyuk was awesome--float like a butterfly, sting like a bee... the Russian supervillain... they banned superheroes there... don't let Panarin fool you. He's a wolf in mink's clothing.I know! I was just saying or asking rather, does that style work with the up tempo style of Kreider? Datsyuk was another player who slowed things down but his tempo control was bonkers and he could lull you to sleep and then take a burst of speed to make an explosive play.
Does Jumbo not slow the play down anymore?
They will trade Killorn and Palat before they will let go of Cirelli or Sergachev
Well the season just ended a week a half ago, probably something to do with itThe NHL is running a 3 month break now. I have kind of a hard time understanding why. All other sport leagues, at least in Europe, is playing for full.
Sorry, I guess I should have said "will provide" instead of "is providing". Am I interpreting it wrong? My initial read is that GSVA is how much good or bad you're providing or expected to provide to your team, and 1.2 is twice as valuable as .6.it doesn't say that. it's a projection based on their estimated NHL impact. Trouba's number value was hurt because he had, by far, his worst season as a pro this year statistically.
Dom's GS model is kinda questionable though imo.
Edit: For reference, Trouba's GS grade was +1.8 before the 2020 season.
IDK what this chart is, but it sure ain't indicative of the numbers in the US. We had over 46K new cases and 338 new deaths yesterday... and that was the best day by *far* for the last week.The NHL is running a 3 month break now. I have kind of a hard time understanding why. All other sport leagues, at least in Europe, is playing for full.
View attachment 372719
Well the season just ended a week a half ago, probably something to do with it
IDK what this chart is, but it sure ain't indicative of the numbers in the US. We had over 46K new cases and 338 new deaths yesterday... and that was the best day by *far* for the last week.
And you'll pardon me for saying this, but one death is too many for me. I'm not sacrificing my 73-year-old, pneumonia survivor mother so you can watch hockey.
Yeah I believe they call it the offseason lolA 3 month break?