Leetch3
Registered User
- Jul 14, 2009
- 13,001
- 10,863
No Tonys on Broadway just sounds bad![]()
Bitetto has you covered...#4DChess
No Tonys on Broadway just sounds bad![]()
Actually, it’s physics - no two masses can occupy the same spaceDeangelo won't be on this team when Nils arrives....its math.
BPS - Bloviate, Punch Reporters, SucceedSo in summation this thread
![]()
This is killing the fictional Strome hockey trade market. I have a feeling Granny is pricing himself out of the marketSo quiet out there regarding Granlund/Haula/Soderberg… three of the main FAs still out on the board.
How is it math
Defense + 1 Nils = 0 Tonys?
4 1sts? A 1st and a 3rd in an alleged 'weak draft'. IF they sign Sergachev first, it would really force them ( if Cirelli was offersheeted ). I'd assume if they intend to keep both, both will be sign at the same time.Are we giving up four 1st rounders for Cirelli in an offer sheet? Or do you have a scenario where we trade for his RFA rights first?
underrated player. id take a chance at him. although wish he was more physical. is he actually good along the boards?A guy like Colin Wilsson for a bargain bin contract under 900 k per would not be a bad idea. He would be a bit of a gamble considering his recent injury history. But... he also plays both C and wing and is still not that old. Is a certified NHLer though - with some character - that might offset losing Quickie a bit. 632 games, 286 points, decent size, PKer...outta the NYR preferred Northeast USA hockey schools and a BU alumni guy (seems to fit The Mighty Quinn’s preference in every which way). Could be an upgrade providing depth over our signed tweeners that does not break the camels cap back. I have heard that name thrown around a bit. He will likely go late, dirt cheap as the UFA situation looks now. Colorado looks like they have moved on when glancing at their current fwd roster...
underrated player. id take a chance at him. although wish he was more physical. is he actually good along the boards?
pass on him then. Rangers need complete players to help their youth that might not be good at defense in their development. no thanksI remember Avs fans saying he is a complete zero when it comes to defense. Didn't hear anything about board play/dirty areas but I wouldn't assume anything good considering the prior comment.
4 1sts? A 1st and a 3rd in an alleged 'weak draft'. IF they sign Sergachev first, it would really force them ( if Cirelli was offersheeted ). I'd assume if they intend to keep both, both will be sign at the same time.
If Cirelli signs an offer sheet for under 7m, Tampa matches without thinking
Then, what happens to Serg in a scenario like this? Where are they getting those 5+ million from?
I think I’ve said it here a few times but a deal around lundkvist and Sergachev makes a lot of sense for both teams..
not a chance in hell i’m helping the Lightning out of cap hell and increasing the likelihood our Rangers go there. And is Sergachev was going to be a Ranger he should have come here in the Mac/Miller trade. Keep Nils and let Tampa figure out their mess.
that’s not helping the lightning. They don’t want to lose Sergachev. That’s getting a good player that otherwise wouldn’t be available if not for the cap issues
Busy week at work. Can someone sum up any important news developments or rumors re: the Rangers since the AHL signing frenzy last week?
There are cap issues so you are helping the Lightning. You’re giving them a cheap talent while the Rangers get a more expensive talent.
yes they have to move a player they love because of their cap issues. We have LD issues so we might want to move a prospect we love.
that’s called a good trade