True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
Players like this never become available.“If you want Rick Nash, you better be prepared to give up Ryan McDonagh and Chris Kreider.”
Players like this never become available.“If you want Rick Nash, you better be prepared to give up Ryan McDonagh and Chris Kreider.”
He was an absolute monster until one of the biggest cheap shot artists in history got him right in the head.In hindsight Lindros wasn't as valuable as it seemed. He was injured like half his career
I think your list is right, but I would have to consider whether or not Kakko is a deal breaker for me. Eichel is what we hope Kakko becomes, plays a much more valuable position and he won't be 24 until the end of October.
Yes except kakkos being paid a fraction of what eichel is being paid.I think your list is right, but I would have to consider whether or not Kakko is a deal breaker for me. Eichel is what we hope Kakko becomes, plays a much more valuable position and he won't be 24 until the end of October.
When healthy, Lindros was as close to an unstoppable force as I have ever seen. People think that Ovechkin dominates games, they really need to see what a healthy Lindros could do.He was an absolute monster until one of the biggest cheap shot artists in history got him right in the head.
He was an absolute monster until one of the biggest cheap shot artists in history got him right in the head.
That's where it all ended. A cheapshot.
I keep wondering how the TV deal would be affected by Covid. For instance, if they do start the new season in January but still do not have fans, does the TV deal get negatively or positively affected? I would think positive because more people are stuck at home to watch. Or do they lose viewership because people are more concerned with Covid than watching a hockey game. And of course the deal I believe will be impacted if there is not a full 82 game schedule.
When healthy, Lindros might have been the most dominant player I've seen. Skills like Maryo, the mean streak of Messier, vision that was not Gretzky-like but pretty damn good.When healthy, Lindros was as close to an unstoppable force as I have ever seen. People think that Ovechkin dominates games, they really need to see what a healthy Lindros could do.
Main board has an Eichel trade looking a lot like what the Nordiques got for Lindros. I think that is total madness, and if he were to really be traded a lot of people would probably be shocked and disappointed at the actual return.
If Buffalo moves him, they can trade him to any team. They can wait a year and trade him to Seattle. They are under no pressure to move him, and Eichel has no say in where he goes. Buffalo also has a ton of cap space, so they can make a deal work with anyone, regardless of their cap situation, if they want.
If Eichel did/does ask for a trade, that isn't going to change the cost significantly. We paid through the nose to get St. Louis, and Nash wasn't cheap. He still cost us 2 roster players, a prospect and a 1st. We didn't give up our best to get him, but he also wasn't as good or as young as Eichel.
There is one player that is a real case of "if only".When healthy, Lindros might have been the most dominant player I've seen. Skills like Maryo, the mean streak of Messier, vision that was not Gretzky-like but pretty damn good.
But any comment that starts with "in hindsight" is tricky.
He was an absolute monster until one of the biggest cheap shot artists in history got him right in the head.
That's where it all ended. A cheapshot.
There is one player that is a real case of "if only".
He came into the league at 18 and one of this first tussles was with McGill, who was a pretty physical defenseman at the time. The comment was that taking on Lindros was like taking on a tractor. Then you add the skill and all that comes with it.......if only......
It's not gonna take Fox. Those other pieces yes. And Tony isn't gonna get paid Eichel money. And it's been reported by Edge that Buffalo has asked about him.So people think the Rangers won't pay Tony long term but Buffalo will ?
Trading for Eichel, Buf wants that low cost NOW... no?
It's taking at least Fox + Chytil + Georgie + 22 + honestly probably another A prospect
Nobody in the NHL is matching all of these packages I've seen here... That is for sure.
I'll do anything outside of KK/Laf/Shesty
It's not gonna take Fox. Those other pieces yes. And Tony isn't gonna get paid Eichel money. And it's been reported by Edge that Buffalo has asked about him.
"Panarin is signing in FLA so it doesn't matter"Players like this never become available.
"Panarin is signing in FLA so it doesn't matter"
Probably all the other things you said in your post. Young roster center (Chytil), Top Prospect (Krav or Key), Georgiev possibly, and probably multiple firsts - if done now Carolina's this year and next year's unprotected. Maybe even a conditional 2022 based on team performance. You know that Gorton likes to get creative with the conditional picks.I shudder to think of what they want on top of Tony though.
Probably all the other things you said in your post. Young roster center (Chytil), Top Prospect (Krav or Key), Georgiev possibly, and probably multiple firsts - if done now Carolina's this year and next year's unprotected. Maybe even a conditional 2022 based on team performance. You know that Gorton likes to get creative with the conditional picks.
I honestly do not want Eichel. He doesn't fix any of our current issues. As silly as it sounds, if we're to grade our offense out of 10, we're in the 9's IMO. We do not need more offense. We need checking centers and forwards and LHD who are NHL capable.