I'm sorry that I picked your post to respond to but now these trade proposals are missing the point from Anaheim perspective. That organization traded Drysdale because they had a surplus of defensemen and by moving him they "converted" this excess on D into a blue chip forward prospect. Suggesting Schneider for Zegras would pretty much mean Anaheim is back to where they started with excess and in a worse situation quality wise at least on D: minus Drysdale and Zegras, plus Schneider and Gauthier. How's this exchange make any sense?!?!
If he retires due to injury, is he not insured?
Woa, woa, woah!!!Chytil, Kakko, and Miller are off the table but you’re trading Shesterkin, Lafreniere, Perreault, Othmann?
innuendo of scorn is unwarranted
If so and they are elevating him thats awesome and wonderful
Wasn't scorn, my friend - just taking an opportunity to poke a little fun - you soft-tossed this one lol.
That’s a diplomatic way of saying no one has worked out so far.
Yes, that's my read on it. If it were longer term, they would have brought someone else in.
Are we assessed a penalty if we deviate from the order?
I agree that will be how we start tomorrow night. Let's hope that group listed last doesn't play much.
Haha. That's a lie. He was hurt for a while and hasn't been bad, but that's simply not true.
Maybe he meant that they’ve noticed he’s really good at healing.
yes.
Right, 5 goals playing on the 4th line getting 4th line minutes. Last couple of weeks playing with a cage after a collision. Almost zero PP time and many nights playing on a line with different line mates.
Perreault is a rw.
I'm convinced you never saw Vickers actually play
