"Big name". He is 22 years old (23 next month) and had back to back 60+ point seasons at ages 20-22. On the worst team in the league last season and a bottom 5 team the year prior.Zegras has 4 goals as a first line pp1 guy. He has never had more than 23. What goals do you speak of? Or are you just blinded by names?
It would be so Rangers to buy another big name player to sell jerseys to fans that want flash. We have 1 cup in nearly 100 years. The fans are part of the problem.
Agreed. Pitlick was never good. Ever.
I would argue that if he doesn't at least play passable defense, he's not a center - he's a wing playing center - like Ryan Strome."Big name". He is 22 years old (23 next month) and had back to back 60+ point seasons at ages 20-22. On the worst team in the league last season and a bottom 5 team the year prior.
The Ducks are a mess. If they're stupid enough to trade Zegras the Rangers should be in on it considering center is a massive organizational weakness.
He would be a long term solution.
Heres the thing I worry about though. This core is so soft, fragile and mentally weak that guys seem to get neutered when they come in. Its almost like the core guys look at them funny if they dare mix it up or competeIt’s sad that it has to take a few rookies to do that. Shows how soft passive and content the team is fine with being soft
It's not even "compete" per say...Heres the thing I worry about though. This core is so soft, fragile and mentally weak that guys seem to get neutered when they come in. Its almost like the core guys look at them funny if they dare mix it up or compete
Olofsson isn’t a shooter. He shoots a lot on the PP. Outside of one year at 5v5 he’s always been around average.
Olofsson had 17 goals at 5v5 just last year.
If we all agree that we aren’t looking to break the bank on a rental, the options aren’t going to be perfect. I’d rather trade for someone like Olofsson, try him with Kreider and Zibanejad and on PP2. PP2 could also use a shooter…
Probably, unless there’s some crazy deal to be made that brings in another RW and “fixes” another area of need, which seems unlikelySo, whether there was any truth to the "taking calls on Kakko" thing or not, Wheeler going down means he's not going anywhere, right?
Yea… the “neutering” piece is cultural. Anyone that has worked on any kind of teams at work- we all see how they can be so culturally different. That’s what I mean about our leadership style. Zbad, Kreids, Fox are obviously tremendous players- it’s just that every winning team has those fire breathing soul guys too. You have to hold each other accountable. I don’t see Adam Fox going over to Mika and saying “wtf Mika…. Shoot that puck, or younleft me hanging- try harder”Heres the thing I worry about though. This core is so soft, fragile and mentally weak that guys seem to get neutered when they come in. Its almost like the core guys look at them funny if they dare mix it up or compete
Sure as hell hope so.So, whether there was any truth to the "taking calls on Kakko" thing or not, Wheeler going down means he's not going anywhere, right?
twin towers
Heres the thing I worry about though. This core is so soft, fragile and mentally weak that guys seem to get neutered when they come in. Its almost like the core guys look at them funny if they dare mix it up or compete
Which is kind of nuts considering they play in what is arguably the MOST confrontational, in your face city in North America if not the world.Yea… the “neutering” piece is cultural. Anyone that has worked on any kind of teams at work- we all see how they can be so culturally different. That’s what I mean about our leadership style. Zbad, Kreids, Fox are obviously tremendous players- it’s just that every winning team has those fire breathing soul guys too. You have to hold each other accountable. I don’t see Adam Fox going over to Mika and saying “wtf Mika…. Shoot that puck, or younleft me hanging- try harder”
Olofsson had 17 goals at 5v5 just last year.
If we all agree that we aren’t looking to break the bank on a rental, the options aren’t going to be perfect. I’d rather trade for someone like Olofsson, try him with Kreider and Zibanejad and on PP2. PP2 could also use a shooter…
Give it away giving away give it away nowwhere the trades where the trade where the trades at
You'll get no argument from me.You want to pay players for what you expect them to do, not what they have done.
Kreider's salary is perfectly in line for what he has contributed since his 1st game under this new deal.
Post signing.
20 in 50, 30+ goal pace
52 in 81
36 in 79
27 in 54 games this year, pacing for a possible 40 goal campaign.
Under 7 per?? That's slam dunk value.
The Panthers made Vatrano a healthy scratch 11 times before the trade to the Rangers. Olofsson can't get into the lineup in Buffalo. Olofsson had 48 goals the previous two seasons. Very similar players. Skate and shoot.Why do we want a guy that Sabres fans have wanted off this team for a while now? A team that is one of the most disappointing in hockey and about to miss the playoffs again.
The only thing I remember he could do against us is get a decent shot off on the pp.
PASS.
Buffalo Sabres
Victor Olofsson
$4.75 million – Expiring Contract
2023-24: 35gp, 4g, 12p, 1.0 point shares
The main reason to look at Olofsson is his proficiency on the power play. He’s still looking for his first power play goal this season, but he posted seven each of the previous three years and 11 the year before. Part of the reason for his rough numbers this season is a shooting percentage of 8.7%, by far the lowest of his career. If that number can get back up near his average 13%, he could once again become a dangerous scoring threat. He does need to be used in a top-six role but there’s certainly an argument that there’s enough of a goal-scoring history to believe he can do it again with great linemates in Vegas.