bernmeister
Registered User
no on tara and I am not so fast on moving EdstromTarasenko would be a fine fit.
Tarasenko and Ridly Greig (center depth) from Ottawa
For a 2nd, Goodrow, and a prospect (Edstrom? Berard?)
no on tara and I am not so fast on moving EdstromTarasenko would be a fine fit.
Tarasenko and Ridly Greig (center depth) from Ottawa
For a 2nd, Goodrow, and a prospect (Edstrom? Berard?)
It seems a little off because you're ordering it and seeing Gustafsson as getting a promotion. Don't order it.The timing of the switch of the defensive pairs is very intriguing. Comes right after Gus costs us a point with an absolute bonehead play. So much for accountability. The outcome is fine with Fox getting a better offensive partner. But something is a little off.
You are right. It's spreading out our 3 pairs. But it does make me believe that our deadline addition is a vereran defensive LD.It seems a little off because you're ordering it and seeing Gustafsson as getting a promotion. Don't order it.
has to do with Lindgren tanking an elite defenseman.The timing of the switch of the defensive pairs is very intriguing. Comes right after Gus costs us a point with an absolute bonehead play. So much for accountability. The outcome is fine with Fox getting a better offensive partner. But something is a little off.
Yea, no.has to do with Lindgren tanking an elite defenseman.
Agree with thattbh I think Kakko is fine. He's not a play driver. His centers have been dogshit at 5v5. He's a headcase that lacks confidence
He needs a Center that can drive play... Tro and/or Chytil is that imo. Zibs is the main problem. He is even draggin down Kreider too imo
The game is more than one occasional pass/rush play a game. Zibs has to reform his game completely. Coaches somehow fawn over him. I guess it's up to him to change, similar to Panarin.
Lindgren has been crap this year. Fox's even strength offensive numbers have plummeted with him.Yea, no.
I wouldn't put KK with Brodz. Brodz is like a physical version of Zibanejad that's not afraid to shoot or go in the corners, but has a quarter of the skill.Agree with that
Zibanejad needs a change in his style and is a big reason why I keep thinking he needs to be split from Kreider.
Kakko did well playing with Chytil before. He might do OK with Brodzinsky as Brods is a faster skater and more of a forechecker. We'll see.
Even our coach suffers from 'bestie' syndrome. Drury forced to break it up.
Lavi breaks up Lindy and Fox.
Do KAM-Trouba, Kreider-Zibs next please
I wouldn't put KK with Brodz. Brodz is like a physical version of Zibanejad that's not afraid to shoot or go in the corners, but has a quarter of the skill.
Brodz likes to create off the rush (though he'll shoot it), Kakko can't keep up. Brodz isn't good enough along the wall or in getting open or finishing, to do much of anything with Kakko's setups off the cycle, and lacks the playmaking ability to get the puck to Kakko in a scoring area since Kakko will only go to a scoring area when he doesn't have the puck (in hopes of receiving a pass).
Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko is an interesting line.
I like Brodz better as a 4th line energy guy with some talent. Could see some sort of him/Vesey/Pitlick line meshing well if they can find a way to move Goodrow.
Well. They are not trading Kakko for a rental. Now if it's a young scoring winger with control, depends on the deal, but they aren't giving up on this kid, just like they didn't give up on Chytil or Laf. Selling low on him would be a huge mistake. His floor is probably 40 5v5 point (since he reached that in his 21-22 year old season already) defensive wiz and possession monster, they aren't going to sell low on that. If they do they're stupid.They have to send out kakkos money to bring in a scoring winger at 50% retained that’s the only way to really make it work outside of moving goodrow.
Kakkos a goner
His QO is 2.4mil. They'll pay him.It’s over he’s an rfa he’s not going to do it here. He’s had his chances. They aren’t going to pay him. Time for both sides to move on. Best way to help us is in a trade.
So what are you attaching to that? A 1st + Kakko and then what? Because Kakko alone won't bring any value. In fact, other teams can argue he's a cap dump and WE have to pay to move his money. 2.1 isn't much, but look at CapFriendly what teams are up against.They have to send out kakkos money to bring in a scoring winger at 50% retained that’s the only way to really make it work outside of moving goodrow.
This also seems like a clear shot from Drury to Ck and maybe even Trouba.Finally a GM who will tell a coach to f*** off with your favorites. Based Drury with the icy veins. This gives me hope he will do what has to be done and not coddle or give a shit about someone's feelings with even bigger decisions.
Then don’t move him.So what are you attaching to that? A 1st + Kakko and then what? Because Kakko alone won't bring any value. In fact, other teams can argue he's a cap dump and WE have to pay to move his money.
Absolutely, which is why I find the calls to move him out pretty irrational. If he's part of a package for a slam dunk trade, sure. If you can improve the team then do it. But the "what to do with Kakko" question is really for the offseason. Even then Rangers will absolutely qualify him with his 2.4m QO.Then don’t move him.
He’s a net positive player. He’s not bonino.
When healthy he out performs his minuscule cap hit by virtue of his defensive numbers alone.
Our long national nightmare is over.
Even if we start with this assumption about Kakko it’s not going to happen or happen outside of another move at forward until offseason. Even with Kakko in the lineup there’s a hole at RW. Trading him one for one will not resolve this.They have to send out kakkos money to bring in a scoring winger at 50% retained that’s the only way to really make it work outside of moving goodrow.
Kakkos a goner
Today’s Media Availability:
With the Chytil’s return Laviolette will get to try a lot of scenarios that were not available to him (the point a lot of posters ignore when asking to split Kreider from Zibanejad or just in general demote / sit some of underperforming forwards). Having only two NHL true centers has been a huge constrain.Kreider-Zibanejad-________
Panarin-Trochek-Lafreniere
Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko
________-Goodrow-Pitlick
This leaves Vesey and Wheeler.
Vesey is in one of those spots and I'd argue that him playing with Kreider and Zibanejad is the best value and spot in general. That line needs a good skater and puck retriever and he plays well with those 2. That is also going to be Laviolette's matchup line come playoff time. We know it is.
No one will say that.Can't wait to play well against Vegas and get goalied, followed by people saying "herp derp guess Bonino wasn't the problem."
That should be the case when Chytil returns and up to speed. Laviolette would need to allocate more minutes to top-9 while Goodrow will get less ES and continue to get PK.I think the best we can hope for with Barclay is as few even strength minutes as possible.
Hopefully as his face heals he will feel more comfortable getting back to agitating opponents, to the degree that we think that helps.
Chychrun and Vatrano are possible at 50% if Lindgren and Kakko go the other way. Leaves us with enough room to get Duclair at 50%. Also allows Chytil to come off LTIR when ready.I think vatrano will be a ranger at the deadline (he’s got term too not just this year)
I think the shine is wearing off lindgren but he could be a traded in the offseason)
I think kakko is a goner. I think our first round pick is a goner for sure.
I think drury is looking seriously at chychrun too.