SA16
Sixstring
you literally in your last post suggested that chytil fow percentage would account for .4 more fow per game if his percentage went up. are you going to keep playing so dense that if chytil was better on draws he wouldnt be taking more and as such would be winning more draws per game like the other players mentioned? really? what are playing these kind of dumb games? and if he could take more draws he would get more 5v5 time rather than just hopping out there on a live change while play is going on?
also your comment about zib is better than him at draws is pretty weak based on the fact the team uses zib on his "strong" side for important draws and literally turned to rooney and goodrow as lh centermen to take draws on the otherside of the ice. that isnt a debate, we watched that happen all season and especially in the playoffs. if chytil could win draws at even 50% clip his 5v5 ice time would go up substantially simply bc he would be on the ice more tasked to take faceoffs.
that was the topic of the original post that you replied to that started this: chytil's poor faceoff play affecting his 5v5 ice time deployment based on what the coaching staff did this year.
stop acting like an accountant who only stares at and manipulates numbers and doesnt know something about hockey and deployment...
If Chytil was better on faceoffs he would not get more ice time and would not take many more per game. For him to do either of those things would require him to play higher than the third line, play on the PK, or have a more important PP role. There is almost zero correlation between FO% and TOI at 5v5 among players with 200 faceoffs taken. Oddly enough, it actually was a marginally indirect correlation this year. In fact, the group of players under 45% FO% averaged more 5v5 ice time than the group of players above 55%.
All of Hayes, Thompson, Stutzle, Barbashev, Mercer, Hughes, Dach had FO% of 42.2% or lower at 5v5. They all played at least 13.4 mins (Chytil 11.7). 13.4 mins at 5v5 is more than Bergeron, J. Staal, Toews, Carter, (0.1 less than ROR), Barkov, Dvorak all of whom were 55% or better.
The "Strong Side" draw thing is one of the biggest galaxy brain things coaches do. They'll have a far inferior player take the draw just because he'll win it to the boards instead of the middle. All this does is cause the team to lose the draw more often.
Last edited: