Gluten Free Breadman
Registered User
Gourde carried that line. Coleman is also overpaid @4.9M for his 1 goal in 13 games.Even in Tampa Goodrow was the third best piece on that line. Would have rather had coleman or gourde
Gourde carried that line. Coleman is also overpaid @4.9M for his 1 goal in 13 games.Even in Tampa Goodrow was the third best piece on that line. Would have rather had coleman or gourde
Respectfully disagree- NYR need to make every penny count over the next 3 seasons.
How are we going to keep Miller, Chytil, and other players looking at cap raises without trimming some of the fat?
I can tell you I’d rather buy out Goodrow than trade Lindgren like some people here suggested. With our defensive depth?
If Kreider regresses to the mean this season I think he’s candidate number one to be moved, but failing that the money to keep Chytil and Miller needs to come from somewhere.
I'm glad I was wrong. That was the way I read it.lol you think I was implying Kravtsov
Dead money is the epitome of NOT making every penny count
No cap penalty effectively the first three seasons, which is where money will be tightest.
And thats just not a realistic concept. Almost all contenders have some level of dead cap.I understand that.
My preference is to not have ANY dead cap space. Regardless of amount.
And thats just not a realistic concept. Almost all contenders have some level of dead cap.
No cap penalty effectively the first three seasons, which is where money will be tightest.
It does push it somewhat down the line. But you can also use that space to lock young kids up, to free up space so we don't have to bridge.Define "dead cap". Is that just buyouts or including IR like the Avalanche are currently doing?
Buyouts are poison for a ceiling team like the Rangers. I don't want 10M in dead cap in the future because we'll be in the same position all over again - ie... contracts will scale to the cap (contracts offered will go up because the cap does) and the Rangers are going to go through this same shit again.
No, it just pushes the problem down the road where, again, you can't find the money to sign a player because you're paying somebody not to play for SIX YEARS. No thanks. Figure it out some other way.
It does push it somewhat down the line. But you can also use that space to lock young kids up, to free up space so we don't have to bridge.
The problem we had in 14-19 was we had to do bridge deals for younger players, so we couldn't extend 8 year deals to the guys who absolutely deserved them.
CK at 8 years wouldve been a steal, mika at 8 years would've been perfect.
So we bridged or bought out 1 year of UFA.
Im not fully sold on buying out goodrow , but if buying him out lets us lock up chytil, laf and miller for 6-8 years each? I dont even hesitate.
Those are the deals that propel a team to a stanley cup.
Considering we have 18m in cap even if it stays flat. We do.Goodrow's 3.5M doesn't address those contracts if we're talking that kind of term. That money simply isn't there unless one of the NMC's gets cleared out.
Fluff piece:
Considering we have 18m in cap even if it stays flat. We do.
Sure but if we’re cup contenders, it’s entirely possible to fill out the 4th with pure league min guys and have decent depth.We have 6 forwards 4 defensemen and 1 goalie signed with 18M in space.
We have to sign at least 8 players with that 18M.
Keep in mind that my response to that post was based on the poster saying he wanted 6-8 year contracts for LaF, Miller, & Chytil.
We certainly DO NOT.
Sure but if we’re cup contenders, it’s entirely possible to fill out the 4th with pure league min guys and have decent depth.
So that eats some but not a ton.
Im the poster who said 6-8 year deals for chytil,miller,laf.Right, but that's not what I was responding to.
Im the poster who said 6-8 year deals for chytil,miller,laf.
I said if buying out goodrow lets us do those deals, I do them without hesitation.
Id be assuming we get the 4m bump to the cap. Which would give us 22 million before a goodrow buyout.Then show me the math behind that. I'd like to see your numbers on Chytil, Miller, and LaF deals @ 6-8 years. I'm thinking your numbers are going to be unrealistically low for those terms and you still need to sign an additional (bare minimum) 6 players beyond that including Kravtsov and Jones. Those deals at those terms don't get done without someone waiving an NMC.