Richard Banger
Mamba Mentality
I’m going to be honest. Never heard of that word in my lifeDon't call anyone a "groomer." It's flaming and you have no reason to even use the word.
I just made that a rule. This was your warning.
I’m going to be honest. Never heard of that word in my lifeDon't call anyone a "groomer." It's flaming and you have no reason to even use the word.
I just made that a rule. This was your warning.
in a fantasy scenario it'd prob be Lundkvist+Kakko+2nd for Eklund/4thLundkvist Chytil and 2ed to Sharks for Thomas Bordealeau William Eklund and 4th?
in a fantasy scenario it'd prob be Lundkvist+Kakko+2nd for Eklund/4th
If for whatever reason Grier would allow us to make a trade like that'd I'd take it and run, even if Eklund doesn't fit the team we've built up right now
Lucky youI’m going to be honest. Never heard of that word in my life
Hunt’s a 4th liner. He forechecks well and throws his body around but he’s not a heavy hitter. He doesn’t have a history of penalty killing and when we moved him up with Panarin he was where plays went to die. Not good at finishing.
Ideally two of your 4th liners should be decent penalty killers. Since Reaves doesn’t kill them either I’d rather move on from Hunt if we can. As for Reaves he’s about 35. The main problem with him last year is we played him too much and by season’s end he was out of gas. Gallant IMO should cut him down to about 50 games—dress him for games against teams like the Isles or Caps that could be more physical.
I guess I missed something. Or I'm old, or something.Don't call anyone a "groomer." It's flaming and you have no reason to even use the word.
I just made that a rule. This was your warning.
the key word is fantasyWhat kind of f***ed up fantasy scenario is this? The entire post doesn't make any sense to me.
Not to sound argumentative but he brings absolutely nothing to the table. He’s a dime a dozen player that hasn’t “wow’d” me yet. Even something simple where you think/say “nice play” is beyond his reach.I think Hunt is almost underrated on this board. He's a good 4th liner.
I've seen too many players absolutely tank this team on a fourth line to call Hunt worthless or take what he brings for granted. He's a dime a dozen, but for fourth line minutes, that's all I'm looking for, and if you can have somebody reliably play those minutes to a tie or better for a minimum cap hit (Hunt), that's a good thing to have.
You’re overcookedI'm going to go cutthroat right now and I'm really baked so hear me out but, if I'm Drury I give Kakko 40 games this season to prove himself otherwise he's trade fodder for someone that will be more useful as a top-6 RW?
ye or no?
Kakko isn’t untouchable by any means, but trading him for the sake of it because he hasn’t exploded, at what?, barely 22 at that point? Mistake. If you can get high value for him that’s one thing, if not just hold onto him and wait and see. At worst he’s a defensive ace that still gets 30-40 points per 80. You never want to be Ottawa in the Mika trade…I'm going to go cutthroat right now and I'm really baked so hear me out but, if I'm Drury I give Kakko 40 games this season to prove himself otherwise he's trade fodder for someone that will be more useful as a top-6 RW?
ye or no?
Hunt’s a 4th liner. He forechecks well and throws his body around but he’s not a heavy hitter. He doesn’t have a history of penalty killing and when we moved him up with Panarin he was where plays went to die. Not good at finishing.
Ideally two of your 4th liners should be decent penalty killers. Since Reaves doesn’t kill them either I’d rather move on from Hunt if we can. As for Reaves he’s about 35. The main problem with him last year is we played him too much and by season’s end he was out of gas. Gallant IMO should cut him down to about 50 games—dress him for games against teams like the Isles or Caps that could be more physical.
I’m going to be honest. Never heard of that word in my life
I'm not advocating hunt on the 2nd line, but his offensive numbers are not limited to just one season.Hunt was so out of place on that line.
I distinctly remember two periods of hockey where Hunt seemingly concluded that he wasn't gonna try to one-time any passes; he kept trying to redirect the puck in off his skate.
The fact that he had a huge offensive season in Canadian Juniors is a testament to how unreliable stat watching for prospects can be
But a person can groom his beard and be well groomed right? I recognized those, but perhaps everyone does, and also had some vauge memory of it having some new negative meaning. I also just googled "groom wedding", and it turns out that the bride groom and beard grooming words are directly related, and comes from the Swedish old word for man (gum, in swedish brud-gum / bride groom gives an obvious hint of that).
What is even worse is that these words are often used the first time in english, and then translated to other languages by some early adopter with poor language skills which can create horrible words. I just recently saw an artilce the other week about gaslågare which is a direct transalation of the established phenomen in english "gaslighter" (someone controlling his/her partner hard and only letting their partner live with a minimum amount of light/energy). Perhaps that make sense in English by the term 'gas light' including some kind of meaning of low use or whatever, but the direct transalation of gas light to Swedish doesn't -- neither in past nor present -- have that meaning at all and if anything refers to more like welding gas, a hot dangerous flame used when cooking or whatever. There is however a word directly translated to 'saving flame' which must refer to the historic phenomen that also has given rise to the use of the term "gaslight" in relationships in english. I.e. you used to put the gas light or gas heater on 'saving flame' and you can say that like a project runs on 'saving flame' as an analogy.
I guess I missed something. Or I'm old, or something.
I'm going to go cutthroat right now and I'm really baked so hear me out but, if I'm Drury I give Kakko 40 games this season to prove himself otherwise he's trade fodder for someone that will be more useful as a top-6 RW?
ye or no?
Same with Chytl.Nothing to do with age, only the media you consume.
Way better proposal than your last post. As much as I adore Kaapo, I have to agree, this is the year he shows it or we have to start looking at options.
Same with Chytl.