I’m reading through this conversation and you aren’t necessarily incorrect. You have valid gripes. The issue with your perspective is it’s not realistic. The Rangers have a unique ability to attract established talent. Maybe 25% of the league can match it. When that’s the case, part of any rebuild would be to acquire that talent. Otherwise, they’re just refusing to get better. For example, i mentioned this in a previous post, Fox, Trouba, Panarin, we’re all great deals. You can’t just ignore them because you want to tank for better players.
The concern I have isn’t that the team didn’t acquire enough talent. There are very few teams in the league who can match the Rangers “talent.“
Zibanejad - elite #1C, at worst second tier
Panarin - top 5 wing
Kreider - 1st line W and PP specialist
Trocheck - High end-mid range 2C
Fox - Norris-winner
Shesterkin - Vezina-winner
Trouba - big physical 2-3D
Then you look at Lafreniere (1st overall) Kakko (2nd overall) Kravtsov (9th overall) Chytil (21st overall) filling out the top 9.
What more did you want? The Rangers have iced the youngest team for a few years. They continue to attract talent. You don’t turn it away.
Yes, I wanted more for Buchnevich, yes, I probably would have traded Kreider. But we can be wrong, too. Kreider contract currently looks like it’ll be a steal. And that veteran continuity did more than just block the kids. It helped them learn how to win games, the talent around him helped Kreider go his game to one that looks like it’ll last a few more years.
There really isn’t that much to be upset about. The Rangers will be in playoff contention and have a chance to win the cup in the next ~5 years. You just hope that they can keep backfilling and add the right pieces to win a cup(s).
I think the bigger concern isn’t the acquisition of talent, it’s the handling of it post-acquisition. That’s the part that I gripe with most