There is little hope of Shattenkirk rebuilding his value.
Can't we do something similar with our players?
Can't we do something similar with our players?
Kinda disagree. If he's healthy and he's producing on the PP, his value will pop right back up. Not to the point where we'll get a big return for him, but something decent.
There will always be a demand for right handed offensive dmen in this league.
I would just rather see Fox and DeAngelo get those PP minutes (I'm sure Trouba will play PP too, as we're paying him so much $, but I would rather he focus on big shutdown, PK minutes; but I digress) than Shattenskirk try and be productive all for the sake of trading him next summer with money returned.
...and apparently not, since his value--like his play--is in the toilet, and we can't even give him away.
But you can, by buying out Smith.It’s not lazy if you can’t unload these contracts any other way. Theoretically we move kreider and Smith, let Shatty rebuild his trade value enough that you can trade him after his bonus next year and we avoid major negative cap implications.
Lol every team gets rid of all their cap issues with no problem and we can't get rid of anyone.
I don't think the prescient question here is whether Shattenkirk could return to a relatively competent form (Though perhaps not his peak since he has certainly lost speed.)
It's whether the amount of PP time that he would absorb might better be used by players like DeAngelo, Fox (later season), or Trouba.
I'm all for keeping and playing Shatty this year, but I want this with the expectation and hope that he would become tradeable next offseason
Lol every team gets rid of all their cap issues with no problem and we can't get rid of anyone.
Lol every team gets rid of all their cap issues with no problem and we can't get rid of anyone.
I would just rather see Fox and DeAngelo get those PP minutes (I'm sure Trouba will play PP too, as we're paying him so much $, but I would rather he focus on big shutdown, PK minutes; but I digress) than Shattenskirk try and be productive all for the sake of trading him next summer with money returned.
...and apparently not, since his value--like his play--is in the toilet, and we can't even give him away.
Lol every team gets rid of all their cap issues with no problem and we can't get rid of anyone.
2nd half shattenkirk last year was pretty good,
Maybe both Shattenkirk and Staal?43 minutes left. If nobody is waived until then and that waivers/buyout window closes - I presume Larry is right and that Shatty gets bought out. Likely one more move nonetheless. I have heard several times that Smith will get bought out. Soon we shall see
Do not understand. Doesn't Shatty have to be waived prior to buyout?43 minutes left. If nobody is waived until then and that waivers/buyout window closes - I presume Larry is right and that Shatty gets bought out. Likely one more move nonetheless. I have heard several times that Smith will get bought out. Soon we shall see
If the team structured the contracts better, they’d have an easier time dumping money
Hockeystatminer goes into this stuff quite often on twitter but recently he was talking about how if Namestnikov’s deal was front loaded, the team would have no problem
moving him right now