On the Gusev talks, for me his quality is a no-brainer. He is closer to Panarin than anything near a player “just” worth 4m per. He is also really good.
With that said I am not sure how he fits in with us nor how we could fit him under the cap.
I also have no concerns about a “Shipachyov” result. First of all, Shipa didn’t fail, he never got a shot. But more importantly, Shipa is a center through which everything should go through. A real strategist that thrives with the puck slowing down the tempo. I am sure he could have success in the NHL, but at least a unit must be build around him. Gusev is totally different and has all the tools Dadonov has— who is a much better comparison — but also another dimension with his playmaking abilities.
In the right environment he could become a star and is a lesser role he could “just” be a really good winger, for which the going rate is like 6-7m at least.
With that said I am not sure how he fits in with us nor how we could fit him under the cap.
I also have no concerns about a “Shipachyov” result. First of all, Shipa didn’t fail, he never got a shot. But more importantly, Shipa is a center through which everything should go through. A real strategist that thrives with the puck slowing down the tempo. I am sure he could have success in the NHL, but at least a unit must be build around him. Gusev is totally different and has all the tools Dadonov has— who is a much better comparison — but also another dimension with his playmaking abilities.
In the right environment he could become a star and is a lesser role he could “just” be a really good winger, for which the going rate is like 6-7m at least.