Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Roster Building Thread LIX: To trade or not to trade CK?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Those power forward contracts don't work.

Lucic
Neal
Ladd
Okposo
Backes

Kreider has been a very good Ranger but those power forwards don't age well at all.

I think Elliotte Friedman had mentioned a Lucic for Neal deal a few months ago.

McKenzie had said on one of his podcasts that an NHL GM told him there 30 bad contracts teams want to lose but nobody wants them.

Lucic for Neal. The bad contracts were traded for each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband, HatTrick Swayze and Ola
RangerBoy said:
Those power forward contracts don't work.

Lucic
Neal
Ladd
Okposo
Backes

Kreider has been a very good Ranger but those power forwards don't age well at all.

I think Elliotte Friedman had mentioned a Lucic for Neal deal a few months ago.

McKenzie had said on one of his podcasts that an NHL GM told him there 30 bad contracts teams want to lose but nobody wants them.

Lucic for Neal. The bad contracts were traded for each other.
Click to expand...
Kreider is not like any one of those players. Not a one.

Also Calgary...da fuq?
 
giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTakedown


Neal at 5.75 and Lucic at 6.0. It might be the stock standard .25M retention so everyone has the same cap hit at the end of the day.
 
I know it can't be done this year, but Neal's buyout, at least to me, seems like an easier one to swallow IF Edmonton goes that route next off-season





Cap Hit Calculations

SEASONINITIAL BASE SALARYINITIAL CAP HITSIGNING BONUSBUYOUT COSTPOST-BUYOUT EARNINGSSAVINGSCAP HIT (
calgary_flames.svg
CGY)
2019-20$5,750,000$5,750,000$0$1,916,667$1,916,667$3,833,333$1,916,667
2020-21$5,750,000$5,750,000$0$1,916,667$1,916,667$3,833,333$1,916,667
2021-22$5,750,000$5,750,000$0$1,916,667$1,916,667$3,833,333$1,916,667
2022-23$5,750,000$5,750,000$0$1,916,667$1,916,667$3,833,333$1,916,667
2023-24$0$0$0$1,916,667$1,916,667-$1,916,667$1,916,667
2024-25$0$0$0$1,916,667$1,916,667-$1,916,667$1,916,667
2025-26$0$0$0$1,916,667$1,916,667-$1,916,667$1,916,667
2026-27$0$0$0$1,916,667$1,916,667-$1,916,667$1,916,667
TOTAL$23,000,000$23,000,000$0$15,333,333$15,333,333$7,666,667$15,333,336
[TBODY] [/TBODY]



Cap Hit Calculations

SEASONINITIAL BASE SALARYINITIAL CAP HITSIGNING BONUSBUYOUT COSTPOST-BUYOUT EARNINGSSAVINGSCAP HIT (
edmonton_oilers.svg
EDM)
2019-20$3,000,000$6,000,000$3,000,000$625,000$3,625,000$2,375,000$3,625,000
2020-21$1,000,000$6,000,000$3,000,000$625,000$3,625,000$375,000$5,625,000
2021-22$2,500,000$6,000,000$2,500,000$625,000$3,125,000$1,875,000$4,125,000
2022-23$1,000,000$6,000,000$3,000,000$625,000$3,625,000$375,000$5,625,000
2023-24$0$0$0$625,000$625,000-$625,000$625,000
2024-25$0$0$0$625,000$625,000-$625,000$625,000
2025-26$0$0$0$625,000$625,000-$625,000$625,000
2026-27$0$0$0$625,000$625,000-$625,000$625,000
TOTAL$7,500,000$24,000,000$11,500,000$5,000,000$16,500,000$2,500,000$21,500,000
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brooklyn Rangers Fan
I wonder if Edmonton is going to trade Neal too. The big problem with Lucic was his NMC. Neal doesn't have a clause in his contract of any kind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom