Ghost of jas
Unsatisfied
I have been hoping to see the Rangers repeat the Gaborik years. now how do they get Panarin to sign for 5 years?
And when can we trade him to Columbus for PLD?
I have been hoping to see the Rangers repeat the Gaborik years. now how do they get Panarin to sign for 5 years?
Also, if things don't go the way the NYR hope, then the rebuild fails with, or without PanarinIf things end up going the way the Rangers hope, Panarin becomes possibly the 3rd or 4th best player on this team, while being the highest paid. I don’t think that’s necessarily a good thing.
And if the cap doesn’t go up?
And when can we trade him to Columbus for PLD?
And scored 14 goals in the playoffs in the fifth year of the contract.Who was traded in the fourth of the contract.
these deals mean Buchnevich is 3.5 and under
Gomez's best year, and year prior to FA, also happened to be the 05-06 offensive explosion which helped his contract.
And scored 14 goals in the playoffs in the fifth year of the contract.
And when can we trade him to Columbus for PLD?
05-06: 3.08 GPG
18-19: 3.01 GPG
Of course. I agree the Rangers can afford him now. And possibly for the duration of the deal.
My main issue is that I still don't see him as the best player on a championship team. And that contract would put him at the top of the Rangers salary structure for seven years (I assume).
It's not to say it couldn't work. I'm just saying I wouldn't make that commitment now.
If he'd take a more reasonable deal like around 10-11%, it's a no-brainer. And frankly I think that's possible. Call me crazy.
You rang?Brooklyn?
I'm sorry you dislike the numbers, but I was merely pointing out the similarities in Goals in 2006 versus last season. Scoring was up. And both players had their best production, regardless of how they scored.Lazy. He had 33 powerplay points - a number he never approached again - and a 13.5 shooting percentage - a number he was never even close to again. Gomez in 05-06 was fueled by good fortune shooting and a year when teams averaged 5.85 power play opportunities per game (2.92 this year).
And if the cap doesn’t go up?
YEAR | 5-6 | 6-7 | 7-8 | 8-9 | 9-10 | 10-11 | 11-12 | 12-13 | 13-14 | 14-15 | 15-16 | 16-17 | 17-18 | 18-19 | 19-20 | MEAN |
CAP MM | 39 | 44 | 50,3 | 56,7 | 56,8 | 59,4 | 64,3 | 60 | 64,3 | 69 | 71,4 | 73 | 75 | 79,5 | 81,5 | |
Change | 5 | 6,3 | 6,4 | 0,1 | 2,6 | 4,9 | -4,3 | 4,3 | 4,7 | 2,4 | 1,6 | 2 | 4,5 | 2 | 3,0 | |
% Change | 11,4% | 12,5% | 11,3% | 0,2% | 4,4% | 7,6% | -7,2% | 6,7% | 6,8% | 3,4% | 2,2% | 2,7% | 5,7% | 2,5% | 5,0% |
+Panarin +Kakko +Kravtsov +Trouba +Fox +Rykov
That'd be an absurd amount of talent to add in 1 offseason.
I'm not expecting too much from K+K, Fox or Rykov next season. But I do have high expectations for Trouba though. The kids might very well start in Hartford and that wouldn't bother me one bit.
How so?
How so?
Surely by the time Kakko and Kravstov etc need new contracts, Staal, Shattenkirk, Smith and Hank will be off the books. That's a good chunk of money.