haohmaru
boomshakalaka
According to what I read in that tweet comparing three retention deals O’Reiley, Orlov and Kane, Kane had twice as much retained. Maybe the other one, where MTL retained, was an outlier, or maybe retention prices are coming down now that the big names are off the board, but the Kane price was in line. Unless I read it wrong, which, honestly is entirely possible. Hahaha. Still, you can’t look at in in a vacuum. Teams knew that deal was dead without retention. It wasn’t for a depth piece, it was for a superstar.
Also I’m not sure why people talk about the actual dollars and not the cap hit. No one is trading for people to pay the player. They are trading for cap space.
The Kane retention was $175K to Arizona and actual dollars is all Arizona cares about. Cap space is meaningless to them at this point being a floor team - it might help with leverage a little bit, but what they're actually paying is a lot more important to Arizona than phantom cap space.