Roster Building Thread IV (2022-23): Luck of the Irish

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If the Rangers are going for it, as all signs indicate - it wouldnt be smart or make sense to trade Jones.

Lindgren is already hurt- if one of Harper/Miller/Mikkola is out then you are looking at Hajek or Roberston taking their spot. Jones is the most seasoned of the 3, 2nd in line to that spot. You need retain depth.
I dont' think Jones is in the Rangers plans and they'd rather have a different kind of player to call up for the playoffs
 
With the chance that Dallas could fall out of playoff contention or even into a wild card spot and they went to the trouble of adding a condition to the Tarasenko deal of the LOWER of the two picks, I would be shocked if they traded a first for Kane.

(Not to mention, several reports that Drury isnt dealing their other first round pick).

Yes, Drury likely didnt think he was in on Kane after the Tank deal, but adding that condition to the deal shows me they really want to keep not only one pick in the first but also the higher one.
1st in 24 might be on the table. Better not be for this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
If we thought the kids were bad deferring with Kreider and Mika and Bread and Tocheck, just wait until you see them with Patrick freaking Kane lol. They may never attempt to shoot the puck again.


Just for the record, the deal could be a 2nd and our 8th ranked prospect and there will be people calling it a massive overpay.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Zac Jones, Brett Berard and a conditional pick. 2nd rounder that converts to a 24 1st if we get to Conference Finals
 
I'm sure there's issues that I'm missing, and it does benefit teams with deeper pockets a lot more; but if the cap is mainly (only) about ensuring a 50/50 split of HRR, could you not set the upper and lower limits during the off-season like they do now, make everyone be under the cap for Day 1 and then allow unlimited trading throughout the season as long as you don't end up under the cap floor?

That way that total player payment is met and if teams want to load up big for a run they are going to be penalised by spending for those assets and then spending again to get rid of them before the next Day 1.
What you're describing is something of a soft cap which is why you've seen many people on here advocate for that.

They COULD feasibly do it
 
  • Like
Reactions: Richard Banger
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad