Roster Building Thread IV (2019/2020)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Vitto79

Registered User
May 24, 2008
27,554
3,784
Sarnia
He can be a call up with a 1-way deal. The 1-way or 2-way only affects the salary.

1-way = Same salary in AHL
2-way = Lower salary in AHL

Alrighty then ... he’d be a fine vet on a cheap deal. When’s the Camp roster released? Thought I saw the Pens released theirs
 

Kovalev27

BEST IN THE WORLD
Jun 22, 2004
21,609
26,074
NYC
Your points are fair, but just on this, Lemieux is on his second team. No big deal here, as he was a prospect that was traded for an established player by a team that had Cup aspirations. And has not nearly had the issues that ADA has had in his other stops.

Noooo Brendan Lemieux was a Buffalo Sabre 31st overall pick. Which would be a first rounder now. That’s 3 organizations before his 24th bday like I said. It is what it is and it would look real bad to end up on his 4th because of a contract dispute.
 

Kovalev27

BEST IN THE WORLD
Jun 22, 2004
21,609
26,074
NYC
I’m glad they invited Haley. Message sent. Get your ass in camp Brendan you aren’t as good as your father stop listening to him.
 

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,715
13,875
St. John's
As long as we don't sign Haley, I'm fine with having a goon for pre-season. Lots of AHL tough guys are desperate to make a name for themselves around that time; may as well give them a willing target.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare

Mac n Gs

Drury plz
Jan 17, 2014
22,742
13,267
Haley is fine for the preseason and nearly all teams have these type of guys come in on PTOs for September. The Flames just gave PTOs to DSP, Reider, and Zac Rinaldo, and the Panthers gave one to Troy Brouwer. Even though we have only 43 (excluding ADA and Lemiuex) spots right now, I don't see the Rangers wasting a slot on Haley. They have better depth winger options, and he's not going to really fill any significant role in HFD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trxjw

Kakko

Formerly Chytil
Mar 23, 2011
23,746
3,466
Long Island
Young players get traded. Young players have literally no input on being traded. People here are ways trying to trade for young players. Young players get traded for vets at the deadline.

A young player having been on multiple teams indicates nothing, except someone trying to craft a shitty narrative against them.
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
Young players get traded. Young players have literally no input on being traded. People here are ways trying to trade for young players. Young players get traded for vets at the deadline.

A young player having been on multiple teams indicates nothing, except someone trying to craft a ****ty narrative against them.

I mostly agree. Having said that, in a league where young talent is at a premium, a player who is moved multiple times in five years typically has a few noteworthy question marks or concerns.

Not always mind you, but more often than not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kovalev27

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,144
34,172
Maryland
I mostly agree. Having said that, in a league where young talent is at a premium, a player who is moved multiple times in five years typically has a few noteworthy question marks or concerns.

Not always mind you, but more often than not.
Yeah, like Lemieux being on three organizations, doesn't really tell you much. He was part of a mega-deal while still in junior hockey, and then he was the targeted young player in your standard rental deal. I've never heard any rumors of any issues with the player. He was just subject to standard movement that younger players sometimes face.

ADA, he obviously had some issues. The maturity questions, the coachability questions. We've been over it ad nauseum. His movement felt more "meaningful" than Lemieux's. Much like the original Tony D--Anthony Duclair. There was "stuff" that followed him around.

Lemieux, I don't think that's the case, at all.
 

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,715
13,875
St. John's
Yeah, like Lemieux being on three organizations, doesn't really tell you much. He was part of a mega-deal while still in junior hockey, and then he was the targeted young player in your standard rental deal. I've never heard any rumors of any issues with the player. He was just subject to standard movement that younger players sometimes face.

ADA, he obviously had some issues. The maturity questions, the coachability questions. We've been over it ad nauseum. His movement felt more "meaningful" than Lemieux's. Much like the original Tony D--Anthony Duclair. There was "stuff" that followed him around.

Lemieux, I don't think that's the case, at all.

Doug%2BCollins%2Bmind%2Bblown.gif
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
The only questions with Lemieux were primarily focused on how his game would translate at the NHL level - specifically whether the speed of the game would potentially limit his offensive production.

With that said, the Buffalo trade wasn’t about him doing anything worrisome, and the Winnipeg trade was because he had value. In neither case were there any red flags associated with Lemieux.

Additionally, in no way, shape, or form was Lemieux a throw-in. Much like ADA, the Rangers knew exactly what they were looking at.
 

Kovalev27

BEST IN THE WORLD
Jun 22, 2004
21,609
26,074
NYC
No one is saying anything negative about Lemieux it’s more of a take on his status in this league and what that looks like if he’s on a 4th team in his first 4 years because of a contract dispute when he’s done nothing to earn a dime more.

Both these kids need to be very careful how they tread right now. They’ve earned very little and right or wrong u move around 4 times before your 24th bday you’re next move might be the khl.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ola

Avery16

Shake my hand, fatso
Jun 28, 2015
12,908
8,666
Brooklyn
Can’t believe it’s been 7 years since the last time Haley was around these parts.
The year we had Haley, we also boasted:
Asham
Mashinter
Powe
Bickel
Segal
Ferriero
Newbury
Gilroy
Rupp
Hamrlik
and Christian Thomas

Cream of the crop, that roster!
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheTakedown

Fitzy

Very Stable Genius
Jan 29, 2009
35,732
23,019
The year we had Haley, we also boasted:
Asham
Mashinter
Powe
Bickel
Segal
Ferriero
Newbury
Gilroy
Rupp
Hamrlik
and Christian Thomas

Cream of the crop, that roster!

We had a great roster that year, it was just incredibly topheavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blue Blooded

NYRFAN218

King
May 2, 2007
17,186
1,631
New York, NY
We had a great roster that year, it was just incredibly topheavy.

What always annoyed me was Torts stuck to his same collapse in the D zone while capitalizing on the counterattack method that worked in 11-12. Given the amount of talent they had up front to start the season in Nash, Gaborik, and Richards, I would have loved to have seen him open things up more.
 

Shesterkybomb

Registered User
Dec 30, 2016
16,573
17,808
Tanner Glass on the ice at important times , ugh

Staal constantly run out there when he should be used on the 3rd pair

Yea mistakes were made but the biggest factor was Zuc getting hurt the year they played LA

The biggest problem vs L.A was that our d were all playing with serious injuries and the only chance we had was if our d could contain them, if they were healthy we could have had a chance, even if their injuries werent as severe as they were. "What if's" I guess, let's hope we can get back there soon.
 

Shesterkybomb

Registered User
Dec 30, 2016
16,573
17,808
What always annoyed me was Torts stuck to his same collapse in the D zone while capitalizing on the counterattack method that worked in 11-12. Given the amount of talent they had up front to start the season in Nash, Gaborik, and Richards, I would have loved to have seen him open things up more.

Torts needed to give Gaborik some freedom, he basically chased him out of New York. I also think he was too hard on DelZotto at times and basically broke him.
 

Shesterkybomb

Registered User
Dec 30, 2016
16,573
17,808
The only questions with Lemieux were primarily focused on how his game would translate at the NHL level - specifically whether the speed of the game would potentially limit his offensive production.

With that said, the Buffalo trade wasn’t about him doing anything worrisome, and the Winnipeg trade was because he had value. In neither case were there any red flags associated with Lemieux.

Additionally, in no way, shape, or form was Lemieux a throw-in. Much like ADA, the Rangers knew exactly what they were looking at.

Also, immediately after the rangers acquired him they had multiple calls from playoff teams wanting Lemieux if they were willing to flip him.
 

Glen Sathers Cigar

Sather 4 Ever
Feb 4, 2013
16,718
20,895
New York
I'll never forget Haley-Newbury-Dorsett as the 4th line in the game Boston eliminated us in 2013.

With D pairs of Moore/Eminger and Del Zotto/Hamrlik.

And Taylor Pyatt getting 16 minutes of ice time (1 minute more than Zucc lol).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Barnaby and Avery16

NYRKING30

Registered User
Apr 29, 2011
6,211
1,941
NYC
Apparently there’s Patrik Laine trade discussions per Incarcerated Bob ( yes I know lol).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad