A cap casualty is a not a top 4 defenseman making 3m per a year going out the door. Who is taking his place? We just seriously weakened our defense and Gallant wont play Jones and Robertson. SO we dont know what we have in them yet and to thrust them into a top four role next year is just wishful thinking. Ben Harpur move up in the lineup youre just creating a more massive hole to our team. WHo are we signing for dirt cheap to take his place? It aint Key, you need him on the 2nd unit with someone who can cover for him defensively while he does his thing offensively. Even if you do that, you still have a massive hole on the 2nd defensive unit and so on. Who cares if he is the so called 4th defenseman by youre standard. I think he isonly less important than Fox and Key. Ill put him on par with or above Trouba. Look at the playoffs and tell me Lindy isnt one of the MOST important players to our team. WHat a great move as a cap casualty lol.
He doesnt score a ton of points and that is what gets people MONEY in this league. Im willing to bet everything i have that Lindgrens next contract will come at 4m per. What makes you think he will make more than that? a 3 year by 4m contract that takes him to 30 years old is the perfect structure and length for him. Barely adds anything to the books besides taking away an extra forward making the vet minumum.
But yes sure lets play devils advocate. You just tossed Lindy. How are YOU replacing him?
Again, I'm not lobbying to get rid of him. I'm not sure it's 'my standards' that he is the 4th most important D on the team. He had a chance to be captain and clearly lost that race to Trouba, like it or not. I understand everything you repeat on end about his style of play, lack of it throughout our lineup, and for how much he does it. This is a roster building thread, I never claimed to move him in season. If anything, we are musing about solutions in the off-season.
Thinking there aren't players like Lindgren around the league, that we could maybe move prospects and picks for to a similar guy on an ELC or at the beginning of a cost-controlled deal similar to Lindys.. or that said player could be targeted in a return if they decide to move another player in a subsequent move. There's so many ways to go about restructuring this roster.
That's fine if you feel comfortable wagering the proverbial nothing online lol, it's fine we're just chatting. He very well may say "give me $3.5 mil a year to play with Fox", he just as well may get lowballed by us and then say "f*** it, I should get my payday". You and I both don't know. A 4m contract that takes him to 30 is a perfect contract for one party, not sure why you think that automatically goes both ways?
I love Lindy as much as every other Ranger fan, but I'm not sure why you're so defensive about a hypothetical if he was moved? If the team (and Drury has proven to go by his beat, whether people like it or not) decides that it could replace the same snarl with a young hungry kid not getting his due elsewhere, and he can parlay moving Lindgren a year early in his eyes before disaster, I'm sure he'd do that. But you and I don't know.
And again, I'm fine with a back and forth, I'm engaging for a reason.... but let me say yet again that I'm not trying to move Lindy lol. It's just not as concrete as every (rightfully so) Lindgren-loving Ranger fan says that he is going to be the most team-friendly perfectly-timed deal this franchise has had in a while, balking at an absolute once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make money.
Anything can happen...