He was AGM and absolutely involved in those decisions.
For all we know he could have been against doing them.
I think he definitely wasn't in favor of signing Panarin btw. The other 2? I'd guess he was for them.
He was AGM and absolutely involved in those decisions.
What does this mean? I feel like last night vs Toronto was like the first time I've seen a camera cut to him during a game in a long time, it certainly hasn't been a running theme of "cut to drury and him looking pissed" or something.Drury has completely painted himself in a corner. His reaction at games lately hasnt been subtle. He committed to these guys and built the roster. He needs to own the construction of the team, especially the forwards. It has to be wearing on him with some of the things we see from the core guys, a couple in particular. We all joke about Drury but when he played there were certain things he seemed to have expectations of that matriculated through his teams when he was in leadership roles and I think he sees some guys on this team right now that he would have an issue with if he was in the locker room with them based on the effort and attention by some of them. He made the group so he's trying to have patience but you can visibly see the frustration brewing.
From what I understand he had an extremely strong voice even as agm. It's one of the reasons he continued to skip vacant gm jobs. His involvement was not just doing superficial, and I can absolutely see why people would question whether he was for or against signing bread. It's not exactly his type of player, although on the teams that he was successful with he had those kind of skill based players that were big contributors. Unfortunately we will always have to wonder how much panarin shifted the direction of this franchise when he decided to take less money to come here...For all we know he could have been against doing them.
I think he definitely wasn't in favor of signing Panarin btw. The other 2? I'd guess he was for them.
I'm seen it plenty of times over the past few weeks. Drury is stoic, he doesn't show a lot of emotion either way so when you see "some" it's more than just someWhat does this mean? I feel like last night vs Toronto was like the first time I've seen a camera cut to him during a game in a long time, it certainly hasn't been a running theme of "cut to drury and him looking pissed" or something.
Problem with the Strome narrative is you're basically catering one player to another. And while that other player is one of the highest paid in the league, I'm not sure he's the guy that carries a team to a Stanley Cup.
So then you have a two player issue instead of a one player one. Trocheck may actually be great for this organization in a post-Panarin world. Strome wouldn't have been.
Bingo. Completely landlocked into that Trochek deal and now paying 7mil aav for our 3c.Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying they should have locked up Strome but think there could have been better options than signing Trocheck to 7 years. I like the player has had good moments here but just think the contract is a tad long.
Panarin-Mika-XXX
Lafreniere-Chytil-Kakko
Kreider-Trocheck-XXX
Vesey-Goodrow-Gauthier
I feel like this is the group - the XXXs could be filled in with Kravtsov and/or trade acquisitions.
If you're not going to keep the kid line together:
Kreider-Mika-Kakko
Panarin-Chytil-XXX
Lafreniere-Trocheck-XXX
Vesey-Goodrow-Gauthier
Either way, 2 middle six wingers should help round this group out nicely.
Harpur is painfully bad. I mean he literally passed the puck to a Toronto forechecking forward while not having much pressure on him and having time to think about it, in a 2-1 game.
I didn't like the Panarin/Trouba acquisitions either (I said so at the time). They made little sense at the time, more so now. They weren't ready to win; they wound up just half-assing the rebuild. It's hard to rebuild and contend at the same time. They brought those two in to fill seats, bring in income and to keep an impatient owner happy; that's not a good way to run an organization.This is what happens when the previous president and GM of the team decided to sign two late 20's wingers to 7 year contracts within 8-9 months. This stupid team decides to rebuild and 16 months later they are signing Panarin for 7 years and are trading for Trouba and giving him $56M.
I never wanted Panarin. The accelerated rebuild stuff was bullshit. The Rangers had barely started the rebuild and they are looking at adding a 29 year old winger. The team wasn’t ready to win. Well you're always looking to add good players was the response. Nonsense. Panarin has become an albatross. You knew that was coming. Three years remaining on the contract. Signing bonus money up the ass. NMC. JD did everything to bring this guy here. When the Rangers built a team good enough to win and they needed a piece, then go get it. Chicago. 2009. Hossa. All of the pieces were in place. We need another winger. Let's add Hossa. The Rangers did the reverse.
There were many fans and media on the accelerated rebuild boat.
I mean Goodrow and Vesey are 4th liners who should move up the lineup in a pinch, not regularly penciled in the top 9. Alas here we are though.
Wait what?!
Drury didnt sign Panarin, Trouba or krieder Not sure what youre talking about
Bingo. Completely landlocked into that Trochek deal and now paying 7mil aav for our 3c.
No trust in Chytil at all with that contract.
This is what happens when the previous president and GM of the team decided to sign two late 20's wingers to 7 year contracts within 8-9 months. This stupid team decides to rebuild and 16 months later they are signing Panarin for 7 years and are trading for Trouba and giving him $56M.
I never wanted Panarin. The accelerated rebuild stuff was bullshit. The Rangers had barely started the rebuild and they are looking at adding a 29 year old winger. The team wasn’t ready to win. Well you're always looking to add good players was the response. Nonsense. Panarin has become an albatross. You knew that was coming. Three years remaining on the contract. Signing bonus money up the ass. NMC. JD did everything to bring this guy here. When the Rangers built a team good enough to win and they needed a piece, then go get it. Chicago. 2009. Hossa. All of the pieces were in place. We need another winger. Let's add Hossa. The Rangers did the reverse.
There were many fans and media on the accelerated rebuild boat.
Trochek has 2 years of NMC left on his contract, after this season. We're not that landlocked. Still stinks cap-wise, but not a catastrophe.
![]()
Vincent Trocheck Contract, Cap Hit, Salary and Stats - CapFriendly - NHL Salary Caps
Vincent Trocheck contract, salary, cap hit, salary cap, aav, career earnings, lifetime earnings, aav, advanced stats, transaction history, trade history, and rfa or ufa free agent statuswww.capfriendly.com
His cap hit is $5.625M.Bingo. Completely landlocked into that Trochek deal and now paying 7mil aav for our 3c.
No trust in Chytil at all with that contract.
I'd be fine with Panarin's lower rate of scoring if it weren't for his insanely lazy turnovers in the neutral zones and around the blue line in the offensive zone.
The coaches should be able to address this, but Panarin makes the same mistakes over and over.