Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
Ducks are also going to be forced to trade Vatanen to Vegas in order to protect Manson. Not ideal at all for them.
And Ranger fans are complaining about losing Fast/Lindberg...
Ducks are also going to be forced to trade Vatanen to Vegas in order to protect Manson. Not ideal at all for them.
And Ranger fans are complaining about losing Fast/Lindberg...
Yeah but according to HFNYR, that's an awful situation to be in. Whereas on HFANA and the main boards, losing Vatanen for free (plus another player in the actual draft) means the Ducks are in "great shape" for expansion.
Ducks are also going to be forced to trade Vatanen to Vegas in order to protect Manson. Not ideal at all for them.
Methot - Demers
Brodin - Vatanen
Ouellet/de Haan/McNabb/Schmidt - TvR
That's a very solid NHL defense even before they start making moves.
I was told the Ducks were in excellent shape for expansion.
It's weird that there wasn't a team who could make a deal for Vatanen then.
Either Vatanen himself for Vegas to not pick Manson, or picks+ to pick Vatanen instead of Manson.
Either way, Ducks aren't in great shape. Baffling.
Either Vatanen himself for Vegas to not pick Manson, or picks+ to pick Vatanen instead of Manson.
Either way, Ducks aren't in great shape. Baffling.
I'm somewhat baffled that a team like Minnesota couldn't find a deal that involved them getting an NHL asset back that they wanted in exchange for a player they're now likely to lose anyway.
Feels to me like too many GMs were looking to bend others over the barrel and no one was really negotiating honestly.
Also wonder how it's going to shake out for Minnesota.
Rangers get a backup to replace Raanta, who isn't brutal
I'm somewhat baffled that a team like Minnesota couldn't find a deal that involved them getting an NHL asset back that they wanted in exchange for a player they're now likely to lose anyway.
Feels to me like too many GMs were looking to bend others over the barrel and no one was really negotiating honestly.
I'm just going by his stats the last 2 years. I haven't really seen him play much. They don't look that terrible (not great either aside from in Buffalo)
Anyone have a link to the leaked protected lists? Not seeing anything on the main board aside from the fact that Neal is going to be exposed by the Press.
Anyone have a link to the leaked protected lists? Not seeing anything on the main board aside from the fact that Neal is going to be exposed by the Press.
Isn't Anaheim way more ****ed than we're realizing?
Teams are going to see the protection lists, see that Anaheim is leaving Vatanen and Manson exposed. And then what? The teams that want these guys have every right to call up McPhee and say: "Select Manson, and we'll send you X player or X draft pick". Then, McPhee can call Anaheim and say: "I've got the Rangers here, they're willing to send us JT Miller if we select Manson from your squad".
The Ducks have two choices. Beat the offer, or lose Manson for nothing.
This is a damn nightmare, dude.
Rangers are so set for expansion it's great. Finally, something we have over other teams![]()
Ducks fans seemed pretty convinced they were in great shape. They even went out of there way to make that thread on the trade board breaking it down.
Isn't Anaheim way more ****ed than we're realizing?
Teams are going to see the protection lists, see that Anaheim is leaving Vatanen and Manson exposed. And then what? The teams that want these guys have every right to call up McPhee and say: "Select Manson, and we'll send you X player or X draft pick". Then, McPhee can call Anaheim and say: "I've got the Rangers here, they're willing to send us JT Miller if we select Manson from your squad".
The Ducks have two choices. Beat the offer, or lose Manson for nothing.
This is a damn nightmare, dude.
Rangers are so set for expansion it's great. Finally, something we have over other teams![]()