- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,302
- 53,962
I've been consistent on this... I hope they see it the same way.
Keep Kreider, move Buch.
Keep Kreider, move Buch.
source???If we're signing Russian UDFA forwards I want Tkachev over Barabanov any day of the week.
More along the lines of Farabee and FrostWould Philly have any interest in Tony D? What would be a good package for Tony and Fast? Ghost + 3rd + conditional 2nd in 2021?
You want a source for his personal preference?source???
I don’t understand why people think Colorado needs a goalie anyway. Their goalies have a .912 SV% and .925 SV%.Guess they have no need for Hank now.
They might be trying to scout their own Georgiev. I'm not going to engage in this fantasy involving Hank getting traded, bought out, or retiring.Guess they have no need for Hank now.
I like Fast, but I would trade him by the TDD and sign Clifford in the summer.If the Rangers were to give any bottom six guy a substantial contract I’d hope it’s Fast. Or do you want them to sign both? I think signing one might be affordable but definitely not two. I could be wrong but I think the cap is going to be pretty tight for the next year or so.
He'll be on the third line in 5 years. Making 3rd line money when you adjust for the cap.
I've been consistent on this... I hope they see it the same way.
Keep Kreider, move Buch.
They play a completely different style of hockey. Panarin type players (Kane/Crosby/Stamkos) keep trucking along as they get older because their bodies aren't breaking down from physical play. Panarin also joined the NHL at a late age so his body isn't as worn down yet. The typical power forward type players normally decline much quicker and around 30 (aside from AO of course who is just a freak of nature).Just to play devil's advocate here, why isn't that a concern for Panarin?
Edge...what do you think of a UFA like Muzzin for the left side if we move Skjei ? Too expensive salary and term wise do you think ? I also think Kreider will get more than 49 Million on a 7 year deal . He easily enough will get 53 .
Did I miss this?Georgiev is pissed already and has gone public.
I think its not a good sign that Georgiev is the one handling this with a lack of composure. The team isnt going to make a decision like this to keep AG happy. What's next? You're getting your NHL salary, you haven't been demoted, youre getting playing time. Chill.Rangers have to decide what they want and unless they get that unreal offer for Georgiev they then have to sit down and talk to Lundqvist and Shesterkin. One of them has to go. Georgiev is pissed already and has gone public. It won't be long before the other two will follow suit. The team has to react now or they'll mess up just like the Isles who ended up with three pissed off goalies...
Did I miss this?
edit: found it, but kind of a reach to say he's pissed and has gone public.
He went public sure, but it wasn't a statement on the situation or a tweet through his agent. He was likely just asked a question and answered it. Pretty diplomatically, I would say.Reach or not...he's not happy with the situation and has gone public. When you have three goalies on the roster, usually at least two of those three are gonna be pissed off after a while. It won't be long until there's more bad blood, maybe also coming from agents like in Halak's case. Rangers are wrong if they think that they can stick with that trio for the rest of the season. They have to either demote Shesterkin or lose Lundqvist somehow. The team has to figure out what they want and they have to find out what the players want.
Or trade Georgiev. By far the easiest solution.Reach or not...he's not happy with the situation and has gone public. When you have three goalies on the roster, usually at least two of those three are gonna be pissed off after a while. It won't be long until there's more bad blood, maybe also coming from agents like in Halak's case. Rangers are wrong if they think that they can stick with that trio for the rest of the season. They have to either demote Shesterkin or lose Lundqvist somehow. The team has to figure out what they want and they have to find out what the players want.
Reach or not...he's not happy with the situation and has gone public. When you have three goalies on the roster, usually at least two of those three are gonna be pissed off after a while. It won't be long until there's more bad blood, maybe also coming from agents like in Halak's case. Rangers are wrong if they think that they can stick with that trio for the rest of the season. They have to either demote Shesterkin or lose Lundqvist somehow. The team has to figure out what they want and they have to find out what the players want.
I think its not a good sign that Georgiev is the one handling this with a lack of composure. The team isnt going to make a decision like this to keep AG happy. What's next? You're getting your NHL salary, you haven't been demoted, youre getting playing time. Chill.
Not saying I like the 3 goalie rotation, but in a non-playoff year what is the worst that could happen? There are two months left, it's not the end of the world.
Or trade Georgiev. By far the easiest solution.
Hank is a professional, and Shesty is doing just fine. Georgiev voicing any frustration isnt just a lack of composure, its an example of poor judgment.Three pissed off goalies with zero confidence.