JESSEWENEEDTOCOOK
Twenty f*ckin years
- Oct 8, 2010
- 80,073
- 17,713
Well 3 or 4 M per WOULD be a hilarious underpayment for a guy who will break 50+ as a defenseman
But I agree with the article that the decision really has to be between Kreider and DeAngelo. The only possible alternative is to take DeAngelo to arbitration to keep the deal shorter and the cost down, and/or to move Skjei without much salary coming back.
Also, Georgiev needs to be dealt.
18 days.
12 per year I mean
12 per year I mean
This place is way less trolly than the Rangers boards on the old MSG forum that linked from the Rangers.com website before the NHL confiscated it from Dolan.
Well 3 or 4 M per WOULD be a hilarious underpayment for a guy who will break 50+ as a defenseman
Who could have foreseen that the guy who was a jackass to negotiate with no leverage, will be even more of a jackass to negotiate with leverage
He has every right to ask for a lot and I’m fine with thatChabot got 8 million a year coming off 55 points in 70 games. Not sure why it is unreasonable for ADA's brother to laugh at $3-4 million. He is going to ask for every penny, and rightfully deserve it.
He has every right to ask for a lot and I’m fine with that
Was making a joke
Someone who wants to make sure they get him before another team does.
Well 3 or 4 M per WOULD be a hilarious underpayment for a guy who will break 50+ as a defenseman
Any general manager who can trade Brassard for Mika, Spooner for Strome and two second round draft picks for Fox gets high grades in my book.
So then stop reading and go somewhere else. This is what happens here. We argue points to help pass the day along.
I think that's the hope for sure.On a cap note, I wonder how much it will increase with the new TV deal in a year or two. We could be looking at a substantial bump
Who could have foreseen that the guy who was a jackass to negotiate with no leverage, will be even more of a jackass to negotiate with leverage
I find it just perfect who liked your post. Staal, Staal, I HATE STAAL. The man is 1000X the athlete any of us are and is in the top 10 of all times games played for the club you claim to like.
There’s always team elected arbitration. Maybe one of our CBA experts can speak to this. Lundqvist was retained by the Rangers under the same arrangement when he was first arb eligible...one year contract and then big payoff. The problem from Tony’s POV is that the Rangers cannot negotiate with him until January 1. Always the risk of injury.Anyone think it’s possible to bridge Tony or get 1 more year in arbitration without totally pissing him off? He’s gotta know that after next year a lot of money will be freed up and then he can cash in . But after what happened last off-season I’m not sure he would be happy about that
I understand why Gorton didn’t take the risk considering the player and his background. I would have been happy if we went long term on him, but it was absolutely a risk.Funny, if you said this last season you are laughed off the board because it would have been hilarious overpayment.
Someone said above that Gorton deserves good grades. I agree. But his contract management doesn’t and can become a heck of a lot better.
Ok great. hes -10000000x the player most defensemen in the league are.
He sucks now bro. No one cares that he used to be good, isn’t helping us now or any time soon.I find it just perfect who liked your post. Staal, Staal, I HATE STAAL. The man is 1000X the athlete any of us are and is in the top 10 of all times games played for the club you claim to like.
I understand why Gorton didn’t take the risk considering the player and his background. I would have been happy if we went long term on him, but it was absolutely a risk.
Definitely glad he didn’t give Buch a long contract like some wanted him to, though. So he gets points there.
Yeah, anyone thinking $3-$4 million for ADA better get the lube ready.
He sucks now bro. No one cares that he used to be good, isn’t helping us now or any time soon.
When you have to resort to “he’s better than anyone who posts on an internet forum”, you know you’re just arguing for the sake of being a contrarian.