Come on. I hate to play the other side but let's try to be fair. Does AG even hold more value than a 3rd rounder?
How about AZ says next years first plus Robertson or Jones. Or next years 2nd and 3rd plus Kravtsov?
Speculation: Roster Building/Rumor Thread XVIII
- Thread starter Gardner McKay
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
How about AZ says next years first plus Robertson or Jones. Or next years 2nd and 3rd plus Kravtsov?
I dunno that Byfield is a C long term. Billed as one, but I’ll believe he can stick there when I see it.
bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 10,028
- 11,165
I dont expect him to come for strome, i'm not naive. I know he would cost something significant, and i can handle that. the yotes seem much more like they are in an asset acquiring phase than a lot of other teams right now and we have an abundance of assets. i am more okay than most to trade nils for the right deal simply bc we have fox. if fox wasnt here and in the role he is than i would be looking to nils to possibly become that player. if nils is part of the deal than no 1st, but if none of the studs are in the deal and it is prospects from our secondary group than i would absolutely deal a 1st for dvorak
LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 10,028
- 11,165
LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
Ok so a first a second (st louis pick) plus Jones or Robertson.
or Nils and a 3rd for Dvorak.
Or Kravtsov and a 3rd.
is that fair?
The answer to your question is probably yes he does. Young goaltender, NHL experience, two more years of team control and Coyotes need goaltending. They are trying to trade Kuemper and they have no one, nothing hip behind him. Probably has value of a second. Coyotes may have interest in Jones.
I like Robertson and he should translate well into the NHL but I agree gotta give to get.
bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 10,028
- 11,165
i move jones well before robinson. people dont want to face the fact you NEED size on the backend in the playoffs. it is just the way it is and this team is not going to make deep runs with fox, jones, and nils taking up three spots no matter how great they may play in the reg season. the playoffs are ALWAYS a grind game the further you go into the battles.
DutchShamrock
Registered User
Look at those teams and recall the Pegula rumor that they want him out west. I'm not debating the logic, but there may be a higher price for the East.
bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 10,028
- 11,165
if that is the case I would pull the trigger on that today and start moving on with the search for a ld
Arizona would take two seconds, AG and Jones for Dvorak? Nothing in that deal hurts us.
where the hell is Chris' number. I know I have it somewhere around here.
Let's go!!! Dvorak on this team would change a lot of things all fot the positive. Especially ending this crazy talk of Eichel and Danault.
bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 10,028
- 11,165
I already listed I would do georgiev, jones, and either our 1st (which should be later) or two 2nds. @bobbop who is fairly well versed with the yotes said he thought that would get it done. We dont have to touch our elite assets...
UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
If the Kings sign Danault, would they be open to a Turcotte for Lundkvist swap?
haveandare
Registered User
Oh man i hope they sign him. Please LA give him 6X6. please
Virtanen is a player to stay away from.
Last year Vancouver was not going to resign him.
They only did hoping to trade him.
He is not a serious NHL player ,But a true partier.
Kid has a hole lot of growing up to do.
I would tend to believe the allegations against him.
I would not risk having him around my players, he could prove to be toxic.
Last year Vancouver was not going to resign him.
They only did hoping to trade him.
He is not a serious NHL player ,But a true partier.
Kid has a hole lot of growing up to do.
I would tend to believe the allegations against him.
I would not risk having him around my players, he could prove to be toxic.
NYblades
Registered User
- Mar 9, 2004
- 547
- 630
East Coast Bias
Registered User
The timing on Eichel seems to be now or never, no? Mika is tied directly to Eichel bc I can’t see them paying both. So you really need to decide now. You can’t play the waiting game with Buffalo into next offseason, unless you want to risk Chytil being your 1C
Well I think there is some formula that if you play for the super anemic Yotes every point you tally you actually multiply by 1.3845 so 40 points is actually 56 for a young center on good deal. Not bad.
- Status
