Speculation: Roster Building Frenzy Part XX

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jake? No.

I'd trade Krebs for Sanderson in a heartbeat though. I LOVE Sanderson.

Well that's my point, I think Lundkvist is closer to a Sanderson or Drysdale level prospect at this point than he is to like a Broberg, Harley or Ty Smith. Lundkvist was already on par with those latter guys, except he's shot up in value since being drafted, so he's definitely above them now.
 
Vegas wouldn't trade Krebs for structural reasons (center, capped out, ELC). Seperately, I think a Nils for Krebs trade would be there in 3 months, 6 months, or two years from now, if it were a thing. He's still a guy who doesn't really score goals and Barzal is really the only top line C I can think of who's still like that style wise.
 
Eichel is only following 1 Twitter account. NHL.

Sabres are following him. He’s not following them back. LOL.

This is fun.
giphy.gif
 
Well that's my point, I think Lundkvist is closer to a Sanderson or Drysdale level prospect at this point than he is to like a Broberg, Harley or Ty Smith. Lundkvist was already on par with those latter guys, except he's shot up in value since being drafted, so he's definitely above them now.
I think he's on a Smith level, who's between Sanderson/Drysdale and the other two. Recency bias seeing Smith as a rookie get picked on at the NHL level. He'll be really good with some more physical maturity.
 
I'd trade Lundkvist for Sanderson

It's not a 1:1 comparison. Lundkvist will be the 3RHD and has Schneider on his heels. We have nothing at center.

I didn't ask if you'd trade Lundkvist for Sanderson, I'm saying I compare Lundkvist to Sanderson in terms of being that level prospect. I get it, we have a need at center, but find me a better center to trade Lundkvist for then because I don't think Krebs is enough.

And if someone is on Lundkvist's heels then trade that person because they are going to stay there. How about Schneider for Krebs? That is more fair. Maybe slanted towards us in that instance.
 
I didn't ask if you'd trade Lundkvist for Sanderson, I'm saying I compare Lundkvist to Sanderson in terms of being that level prospect. I get it, we have a need at center, but find me a better center to trade Lundkvist for then because I don't think Krebs is enough.

And if someone is on Lundkvist's heels then trade that person because they are going to stay there. How about Schneider for Krebs? That is more fair. Maybe slanted towards us in that instance.
Lundkvist for Krebs is a fair trade. Just as Lundkvist for Turcotte.

I know you like him and he's going to be good. It's a hockey trade to make the team better.
 
Lundkvist for Krebs is a fair trade. Just as Lundkvist for Turcotte.

I know you like him and he's going to be good. It's a hockey trade to make the team better.

Agreed.

Though It's possible that a midseason trade is more likely, that is if Schneider is absolutely kicking the doors down in Hartford.

Lots of options. Love the choices we have at the blue line.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad