Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
Would you trade Sanderson for Krebs?
People actually pay for the Athletic?
Jake? No.
I'd trade Krebs for Sanderson in a heartbeat though. I LOVE Sanderson.
I'd trade Lundkvist for SandersonWould you trade Sanderson for Krebs?
I think he's on a Smith level, who's between Sanderson/Drysdale and the other two. Recency bias seeing Smith as a rookie get picked on at the NHL level. He'll be really good with some more physical maturity.Well that's my point, I think Lundkvist is closer to a Sanderson or Drysdale level prospect at this point than he is to like a Broberg, Harley or Ty Smith. Lundkvist was already on par with those latter guys, except he's shot up in value since being drafted, so he's definitely above them now.
I'd trade Lundkvist for Sanderson
It's not a 1:1 comparison. Lundkvist will be the 3RHD and has Schneider on his heels. We have nothing at center.
Watch him go full chaos and start following one team at a time.Eichel is only following 1 Twitter account. NHL.
Sabres are following him. He’s not following them back. LOL.
This is fun.
Maybe Vally's spider senses was it actually being his account?This is turning out to be a freaking hilarious hockey day. Vally, then Brooks, then Eichel, the Vogl, then Eichel again. Going to go make some popcorn and hope it keeps going.
In order of year joining the NHL.Watch him go full chaos and start following one team at a time.
Watch him go full chaos and start following one team at a time.
Wait until he follows the RangersEichel is only following 1 Twitter account. NHL.
Sabres are following him. He’s not following them back. LOL.
This is fun.
![]()
Lundkvist for Krebs is a fair trade. Just as Lundkvist for Turcotte.I didn't ask if you'd trade Lundkvist for Sanderson, I'm saying I compare Lundkvist to Sanderson in terms of being that level prospect. I get it, we have a need at center, but find me a better center to trade Lundkvist for then because I don't think Krebs is enough.
And if someone is on Lundkvist's heels then trade that person because they are going to stay there. How about Schneider for Krebs? That is more fair. Maybe slanted towards us in that instance.
Lundkvist for Krebs is a fair trade. Just as Lundkvist for Turcotte.
I know you like him and he's going to be good. It's a hockey trade to make the team better.
How is it Eichels fault that Vogl tweeted false info?Man I love to see Eichel clowning on reporters but Vogl has been a bit of an ally publicly for Eichel in his quest to get traded
Eichel playing a dangerous game
It’s not his fault but he also didn’t need to publicly embarrass him either lolHow is it Eichels fault that Vogl tweeted false info?