GirardSpinorama
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2004
- 22,180
- 11,124
As it is we have zero third line so that would make sense - but I also like the idea some have suggested as him as a top six complimentary winger. I think that’s the best way to maximize Colton’s offensive potential…something of a fill-in role for Landeskog may be worth at least trying where he just goes hard and fast next to MacK, scoring some greasy goals and taking face-offs for the line when needed.I'm assuming this means we all see Colton as our 3C?
I get the sense that Colton is sort of a center version of Lehkonen from what some of y'all are saying. Is that close?
This team’s needed a consistent presence at 3C since Yelle got packaged with Drury.Wood got 2.5 for six years, Colton a bit more? 3-3.5mil for 6 years?
That's my guess, if we go with a long-term contract.
Worth the risk imo. This could be a bargain.
This team’s needed a consistent presence at 3C since Yelle got packaged with Drury.
I'm trying to remember the last true 3rd line center we had that I liked for the role. Gratton, Nicolishin? Damn it's been a while.It's been such a merry go round of meh for 20 years.
Love that they finally committed to a guy who fits the 3C role well, rather than a smaller skill tweener that can't stick in the top six, which is mostly what they've done the last couple decades.
I'm trying to remember the last true 3rd line center we had that I liked for the role. Gratton, Nicolishin? Damn it's been a while.
Wood got 2.5 for six years, Colton a bit more? 3-3.5mil for 6 years?
That's my guess, if we go with a long-term contract.
Worth the risk imo. This could be a bargain.
".... and as you can see by our track record with 2nd round picks, the average NHL salary the player should be awarded is minus three million dollars."This shouldn't be a surprise. If anything this just puts a deadline on a deal being made. What are teh Avs going to do in arbitration? You know, it's not like they can trash the player they just traded a 2nd rounder for
It really isn't a big deal... happens a decent amount. I see at least two other players who moved teams and are on this list (Mitchell and Vilardi)I disagree. Usually teams know what free agents want before trading for them.
Don't you think this means it's likely the Avs' will have to sign Colton to a bit higher number than they would like? The Avalanche won't walk away from what the Arbitrator gives Colton since we gave up a 2nd round pick for him!It really isn't a big deal... happens a decent amount. I see at least two other players who moved teams and are on this list (Mitchell and Vilardi)
I mean it was the same thing with Toews. We traded for him, he filed for arbitration, deal got done before the hearing. No doubt this will be the case here as well.Don't you think this means it's likely the Avs' will have to sign Colton to a bit higher number than they would like? The Avalanche won't walk away from what the Arbitrator gives Colton since we gave up a 2nd round pick for him!
Not really... his comparables are in the mid 3s and there can only be a 1 year deal out of arbitration. There is incentive for both parties to get some term here. My pure guess is the Avs want 4+ years, but don't want to go too high (over 4) and Colton if there is term wants a 4.5-4.75m especially after seeing Compher's deal. Which means to stay in the 3s it has to be a 2-3 year deal. If there is term, the Avs will have to pay up.Don't you think this means it's likely the Avs' will have to sign Colton to a bit higher number than they would like? The Avalanche won't walk away from what the Arbitrator gives Colton since we gave up a 2nd round pick for him!