Robertson is out for the yearRobertson
23 1st
Engvall
Voit or Minten
For ROR 50%retained
Blame Dubas
He is the best prospect you have. He fits blues system. Whom else do you have worth it to the Blues that fills a need for them.Perfect, if hes just a B prospect then we can use a different B prospect and keep him.
Thats all great, youre not getting a virtually untouchable prospect for a post-prime, injured centerman who is having the worst statistical season of his career and is an unrestricted free agent after the playoffs.He is the best prospect you have. He fits blues system. Whom else do you have worth it to the Blues that fills a need for them.
For Knies? Why would Dubas need to be blamed for drafting Knies?Blame Dubas
You said Knies was untouchable. You dont have anyone else Blues would consider for a ROR trade. Thats Dubas no?Thats all great, youre not getting a virtually untouchable prospect for a post-prime, injured centerman who is having the worst statistical season of his career and is an unrestricted free agent after the playoffs.
For Knies? Why would Dubas need to be blamed for drafting Knies?
I didnt say Knies was untouchable, it was reported by Friedman that he was virtually untouchable.You said Knies was untouchable. You dont have anyone else Blues would consider for a ROR trade. Thats Dubas no?
or you have no one else worth trading for. they have other teams to trade ROR to. weird post.I didnt say Knies was untouchable, it was reported by Friedman that he was virtually untouchable.
If we have nobody else the blues would even consider for a ROR trade that sounds like an internal problem they should work out before they move anybody.
I imagine Dubas and the leafs would disagree. Just because you pretend the leafs have nothing anybody would ever want doesnt make it true.or you have no one else worth trading for. they have other teams to trade ROR to. weird post.
sure. maybe Robertson and a 2nd would work. Blues fan likely laughI imagine Dubas and the leafs would disagree. Just because you pretend the leafs have nothing anybody would ever want doesnt make it true.
Thats fun for blues fans for you to make up an offer, pretend its from a toronto fan and then side with blues fans that its bad.sure. maybe Robertson and a 2nd would work. Blues fan likely laugh
Robertson
23 1st
Engvall
Voit or Minten
For ROR 50%retained
Maybe 1st and minten. No interest in voit.I hope he bounces back, and he's been the victim of injuries and losing games to COVID, but Robertson has next to no value now. He's just not an interesting or meaningful piece if you're selling on Deadline Day. He JUST had shoulder surgery, so who knows how is recovery will go and has done nothing in the NHL yet to make people look past the injuries.
All that being said, I think a 1st and one of Voit and Minten is probably pretty close, though including the retention may undersell that a bit.
1st 2023 and minten would be decent value.Maybe 1st and minten. No interest in voit.
More than I would like to pay but I can see somebody offering that level of package.1st 2023 and minten would be decent value.
I'm sure it will be higher than that. Especially since dubas is on last leg.More than I would like to pay but I can see somebody offering that level of package.
That's not how things work when there are other options available.I'm sure it will be higher than that. Especially since dubas is on last leg.
ROR has 16 points and is coming and he's 75% likely to be injured by the playoffs.Robertson
23 1st
Engvall
Voit or Minten
For ROR 50%retained
This x 10That's not how things work when there are other options available.
I would like O'Reilly, but not at any cost. And it 'feels' like this year has less teams with the assets and willingness to really push at the TDL. If the Leafs really want to go for it, I think trying to get a package of Horvat, Kuzmenko, Schenn, while expensive, would be the right pieces to really balance out the roster.
ROR is scoring at a 20+ goal rate for a season.ROR has 16 points and is coming and he's 75% likely to be injured by the playoffs.
Why not use that package to get a player that isn't totally washed up?
This x 10
Imagine the Leafs get ROR and Tampa or Boston gets Horvat (a third party retaining to make it fit under the cap). It'd be like empty your prospects and pick for ROR and he'll be the match up Horvat feasts on every game.
I agree. ROR is a nice fit and probably is one of the better fits out there. But age, injuries and a rental who likely won't be extend are all factors here. 1st and Minten to me is already an overpay in this situation and I get that Blues fans would be underwhelmed and other teams probably match and exceed that offer. 1st and Voit is more underwhelming for Blues fans and more palatable for the Leafs, but is still a bit of a bite the bullet/cost of doing business but better hope this works out situation.One thing I do wonder about ROR to Toronto - and I stand by my 1st + Voit or Mitten type as probably within shouting distance of a deal (maybe the Leafs throw in a mid-round pick) - is whether there's a once bitten, twice shy element. Probably the biggest swing and miss of Dubas' career was the Foligno trade. Obviously the situations aren't exactly the same, but an older player/down year/lots of miles is close enough to make me wonder whether the Leafs want a bit more security in any trade where they're using their main moveable asset (the first rounder). Still, I expect ROR does return a 1st, a decent prospect (but not some team's top couple of prospects), and a mid-round pick.
Wow 20 goal pace, move over Engvall, let's trade Matthews for him.ROR is scoring at a 20+ goal rate for a season.
"Totally washed up" while using raw points with a player who was saddled with Josh Leivo and cataclysmically awful first month Kyrou. Also declaring the "75% likely to be injured by the playoffs" fully from your ass.
He's currently injured. That's entirely different than "75% likelihood of being injured by the playoffs." Your 75% is straight nonsense.Wow 20 goal pace, move over Engvall, let's trade Matthews for him.
ROR doens't have injuries issues? Ok, sure, I'm the one making things up.
Oh so he's already injured and doesn't have an injury history.He's currently injured. That's entirely different than "75% likelihood of being injured by the playoffs." Your 75% is straight nonsense.
A player who is scoring more than 20 goals in the NHL is not "totally washed up" which is what you wrote in your post. Also nonsense.
Carry on