Hockey 4 Life
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2012
- 6,311
- 3,292
I wouldn't expect him to be packaged with ROR. If we get a 2d+ I will shrug and say, that's decent, but too bad because some years the market covets these players a little higher.I don't think he lands a 1st especially if he's packaged with ROR.
But a 2nd+? sure
I wouldn't expect him to be packaged with ROR. If we get a 2d+ I will shrug and say, that's decent, but too bad because some years the market covets these players a little higher.
The Blues don't have much incentive to combine our assets unless it makes the top end piece coming back pop more, which this does not.2024 1st + Robertson + 2023 3rd
for ROR + Acciari
2 2nds.He's not getting a 1st no chance, especially if he's packaged with ROR
I don't think he lands a 1st especially if he's packaged with ROR.
But a 2nd+? sure
It will be a 2023 first. Army is not going to want a 2024 first unless its accompanied with more....2024 1st + Robertson + 2023 3rd
for ROR + Acciari?
That alone would get you ROR. Acciari is a valuable piece. Low salary and can play outstanding two way hockey. Robertson future is bleak.
2 2nds.
It will be a 2023 first. Army is not going to want a 2024 first unless its accompanied with more....
ROR would be a great addition to any team for the POs. That being said, isn't he on LTIR with a broken foot with a ? as to whether will be back for deadline?
Price of 1st + was already a bit ridiculous for a guy who's a pure rental posting career worst numbers across multiple categories (g, a , pts, +/-, FO, etc). Can't see the injury helping matters.
Knies and a 3rd for ROR and Acciari?
What do people think RoR's next contract looks like?
A very good thing to discuss, since we know that Dubas likes to have term when he acquires a player. Giordano came as a rental, but he was extended. It's reasonable to think that Toronto would like to have any player they pick up beyond just one playoff run.
If ROR can maybe be extended for a reasonable price, then he's more appealing to Toronto.
I'd rather have a 1st + a Tippett-quality prospect than Knies, and I certainly don't want to offer Acciari up for free as a sweetener.Knies and a 3rd for ROR and Acciari?
2nds was reference to barbashev, 1st plus b prospect + for ror with retention and cap dump.2 2nds is pushing it but MAYBE
2nds was reference to barbashev, 1st plus b prospect + for ror with retention and cap dump.
OK was making sure. Barbs low cap hit can be a perfect addition. To stacked team. Pk pp and third line center. Everything a cup contender could need for cheapI know and I'm saying 2 2nds for Barbashev is pushing it but you MIGHT get it.
OK was making sure. Barbs low cap hit can be a perfect addition. To stacked team. Pk pp and third line center. Everything a cup contender could need for cheap
At the trade deadline wouldn't ROR's cap hit be about 25% of that 7.5 million though? Less than 2 millionATM O' Reilly's caphit is $7,500,000. With his age, how he played this season and taking into consideration the fact that a lot of contenders are capstrapped, I can't imagine that number going up but rather going down.
I wouldn't be surprised if a team offers him a contract in the 6-6,5 million range for 4 years purely based in his merits. And yes, that contract could be really bad in a couple of years.
If I were you guys I'd be very interested in trading for him as a rental (as he excels in the playoffs and might very well push you to the 'favorites category'), but looking at your other contracts I wouldn't sign him to a longer deal unless he's willing to sign a contract quite a bit below 6 million on a shorter deal.
Toronto has accrued 1.1 million to date, mostly due to Muzzin. So if 50% retained, looks like it could work.At the trade deadline wouldn't ROR's cap hit be about 25% of that 7.5 million though? Less than 2 million
ROR would be a great addition to any team for the POs. That being said, isn't he on LTIR with a broken foot with a ? as to whether will be back for deadline?
Price of 1st + was already a bit ridiculous for a guy who's a pure rental posting career worst numbers across multiple categories (g, a , pts, +/-, FO, etc). Can't see the injury helping matters.
At the trade deadline wouldn't ROR's cap hit be about 25% of that 7.5 million though? Less than 2 million
Toronto has accrued 1.1 million to date, mostly due to Muzzin. So if 50% retained, looks like it could work.
Unless it gets eaten up by a player coming back from IR or LTIR.
A very good thing to discuss, since we know that Dubas likes to have term when he acquires a player. Giordano came as a rental, but he was extended. It's reasonable to think that Toronto would like to have any player they pick up beyond just one playoff run.
If ROR can maybe be extended for a reasonable price, then he's more appealing to Toronto.