- Jun 24, 2012
- 85,222
- 156,079
Do we have an update on what improvements he’s made to his skating? Also, what’s his current playing weight?He's really slow. Training can probably improve that, but with his current speed he won't make the NHL.
Do we have an update on what improvements he’s made to his skating? Also, what’s his current playing weight?He's really slow. Training can probably improve that, but with his current speed he won't make the NHL.
With the new management’s prioritizing speed, hopefully the days (decades) of drafting players who have acknowledged skating limitations is finally over. Let some other team draft these players with the hope that they are able to improve this critical facet of the game. I’ve said it before: the regressive approach of drafting players with limited skating abilities is akin to drafting water polo players who have limitations in swimming abilities. If it is foolhardy to do the latter, why in heaven is it not similarly foolhardy to do the former?Do we have an update on what improvements he’s made to his skating? Also, what’s his current playing weight?
I guess no Suzuki and no Joshua Roy then.With the new management’s prioritizing speed, hopefully the days (decades) of drafting players who have acknowledged skating limitations is finally over. Let some other team draft these players with the hope that they are able to improve this critical facet of the game. I’ve said it before: the regressive approach of drafting players with limited skating abilities is akin to drafting water polo players who have limitations in swimming abilities. If it is foolhardy to do the latter, why in heaven is it not similarly foolhardy to do the former?
He looks a bit faster than last year. He still need to add mass thought. He's still a twig.Do we have an update on what improvements he’s made to his skating? Also, what’s his current playing weight?
Or Caufield...I guess no Suzuki and no Joshua Roy then.
That’s how Mike Bossy slipped in his draft year.With the new management’s prioritizing speed, hopefully the days (decades) of drafting players who have acknowledged skating limitations is finally over. Let some other team draft these players with the hope that they are able to improve this critical facet of the game. I’ve said it before: the regressive approach of drafting players with limited skating abilities is akin to drafting water polo players who have limitations in swimming abilities. If it is foolhardy to do the latter, why in heaven is it not similarly foolhardy to do the former?
Outside the top picks everyone is going to have some sort of limitation. So which limitation becomes acceptable, hockey IQ, puck skills, shooting, vision?With the new management’s prioritizing speed, hopefully the days (decades) of drafting players who have acknowledged skating limitations is finally over. Let some other team draft these players with the hope that they are able to improve this critical facet of the game. I’ve said it before: the regressive approach of drafting players with limited skating abilities is akin to drafting water polo players who have limitations in swimming abilities. If it is foolhardy to do the latter, why in heaven is it not similarly foolhardy to do the former?
for me, if a player has big physical deficiencies (skating, shot) , the only thing that might rescue them is elite hockey iqOutside the top picks everyone is going to have some sort of limitation. So which limitation becomes acceptable, hockey IQ, puck skills, shooting, vision?
No Stanley Cups in 30 years. I suggest we fundamentally change our drafting philosophy. I’m confident the new management team will do what is necessary to adopt a course of action that will see us being competitive sooner than another 30 year period.I guess no Suzuki and no Joshua Roy then.
No Stanley Cups in 30 years. I suggest we fundamentally change our drafting philosophy. I’m confident the new management team will do what is necessary to adopt a course of action that will see us being competitive sooner than another 30 year period.
Exactly. There is no crystal ball showing who will make it. It is not all about drafting...player development can make a difference between a good player and a bust.Yet Tampa drafts a bad skater in Brayden Point and he becomes a big part of their back to back stanley cups win.
I don’t think its very insightful to build a drafting strategy around drafting fourth round draft choices who one hope’s will overcome their acknowledged skating deficiencies. It means that there is just one more hurdle they have to overcome in reaching the NHL. For every Point there are hundreds of McShanes, Fonstads, Crisps, Hudons, who enter the draft with questionable skating skills. That’s why they are 4th, 5th and lower draft choices.Exactly. There is no crystal ball showing who will make it. It is not all about drafting...player development can make a difference between a good player and a bust.
Yet Tampa drafts a bad skater in Brayden Point and he becomes a big part of their back to back stanley cups win.
I meant developing our 1st and 2nd round pick!I don’t think its very insightful to build a drafting strategy around drafting fourth round draft choices who one hope’s will overcome their acknowledged skating deficiencies. It means that there is just one more hurdle they have to overcome in reaching the NHL. For every Point there are hundreds of McShanes, Fonstads, Crisps, Hudons, who enter the draft with questionable skating skills. That’s why they are 4th, 5th and lower draft choices.
This is veering off topic, but any drafting strategy that is only concerned about top picks is going to fail at building a contender. You need to find ways for those non-1st round picks to develop into NHL players.I don’t think its very insightful to build a drafting strategy around drafting fourth round draft choices who one hope’s will overcome their acknowledged skating deficiencies. It means that there is just one more hurdle they have to overcome in reaching the NHL. For every Point there are hundreds of McShanes, Fonstads, Crisps, Hudons, who enter the draft with questionable skating skills. That’s why they are 4th, 5th and lower draft choices.
I've seen him get away a bit more with his speed this year. There's a lot more work to be done but there's been some improvement.
Center is the biggest need we have. Why would we go for Kravtsov which is probably our area of strength?I like that we have Kidney in our system and his age 18 season is very nice to see. And I do expect him to mature but I see him on a long road. Personally, I would consider trading him for other areas of need cause it's sell high point. Once he turns pro after next season, his value might take a nose dive like Poehling and so many others.
Am I wrong on Kidney? Maybe but I see a undersized center who needs to add a lot of muscle and have better skating. That's a big task in future development. Players do prove you wrong at times but it's more the exception to the rule than the rule.
Call me crazy but I would flip Kidney for Kravtsov if the Rangers were open to it.
Center is the biggest need we have. Why would we go for Kravtsov which is probably our area of strength?
Kidney is the best center in the Q right now. With 0 physical maturity and average skating. He's doing what he's doing on talent and IQ alone.
I like the offensive skill and goal scoring power Kravtsov has. I'm a little higher on him than most.
I do get the concerns of trading Kidney but I think he will have difficulty after turning pro. Needs to improve both skating and added muscle if he wants to compete with men. No question he is one of the best centers in the Q right now yes.
Yeah well he's 18, who cares about all of that right now? We're in a rebuild. If it takes Kidney longer to get here, it effects nothing.
Bookmark it. I'll eat crow if I'm wrong on Kidney. For all we know both Kidney and Kravtsov are meh players in the NHL.