Final ELC years. Even strength points/60
Pastrnak - 2.41
Nylander - 2.44
Yeah, I mean, its not like Nylander was riding a crazy oiSH%. I mean, he had a 12% one at 5v5, and he's never been able to be on a line that converts at a high-rate without Matthews. Marner's 11.4 likely won't hold, but there is more evidence to support he drives a higher conversion rate that makes it more likely to stay above 10 than there is with Willy. Who would have predicted that would go down and inflate his P/60....
Also, you can pick at any one stat to drive home a point. I thought goal scorers were paid more, (whcih is what I hear repeatedly in this thread).
G/60 at 5v5 for Pastrnak: 1
G/60 at 5v5 Nylander: .63
Let's also ignore that Pastrnak had better total numbers, better raw possession numbers, better relative possession numbers, was a year younger and also sold off 1 more UFA year. But, yes, P/60 at 5v5 is all that matters. If that's the metric you want to use to defend your point, Marner just finished above finished-above Patrick Kane, Panarin, Matthews, and McDavid while riding an insanely low 2nd assist rate. He also had the highest primary point/60 at 5v5 which is more repeatable than outright P/60. So, if your case is built solely around P/60 for Nylander, you should probably have no problem paying Marner his demands. Not that I would cave to Marner today, but you can't just hammer home one number as basis for why Nylander deserved a better deal than Pastrnak.