your math doesnt matter because players signed contracts in different years, and in different cities with completely different tax implications.
take Point and Marner's contracts for example as they were signed in the same off season, if you factor in the tax difference, Point makes more than Marner, but, because of Florida has a lower cap hit
Point vs Marner ...Point makes 1/2 a million more NET than Marner, while having a lower cap hit... and accountants playing with numbers is irrelevant, because Point as well as Marner both have accountant trying to maximize the NET, so, when people try to argue that point, its just silly, because they make it sound like only Marner would have an accountant, and not Point.
ESTIMATED TAX RATE | TAX PAID | NET INCOME |
---|
40.79% | $3,670,738 | $5,329,262 |
53.25% | $5,515,134 | $4,842,866 |
this is HUGE, and the league and player's association have never done squat to equalize and compensate all the high tax cities... if there is a flat cap (as there is) the taxes should also be factored into the Cap too!