- Dec 12, 2017
- 26,015
- 12,460
Roughly 7 million.How much does Tampa spend on their bottom six vs ours ?
Roughly 7 million.How much does Tampa spend on their bottom six vs ours ?
most games in hockey, winning is a 1/2 chance. Going 0/9 in close out games is very rare.
1/512 odds
it's mathematical proof of something. cursed ? lack of will ?
We KNOW this team CONSISTENTLY plays DOWN to inferior teams. We even let up on the power play. We are a skilled team that really does lack a desire to win that is key in the playoffs. They do lack a passion. Is it blue and white disease ?
Our only good shake up is moving Nylander and I think it will happen.
I know, but if he was 100 physical and mentally prepared to play and they could make it work it might be worth it.
Whatever they give up to get him has to be replaced with competent NHL players that provide something different that this team lacks. A 25 goal scorer that can crash the net and score goals that way, might be more valuable than Nylander come playoffs.
Last year it was SC finalists we took to 7 games (forget we were up 3-1 though and the Habs barely made the playoffs and Keefe made no adjustments)We came within an inch of beating TB
How much does Tampa spend on their bottom six vs ours ?
Last year it was SC finalists we took to 7 games (forget we were up 3-1 though and the Habs barely made the playoffs and Keefe made no adjustments)
CBJ - we lost to a team that beat TB previously and they were tied in the standings (forget that we couldn't score to save our lives)
Hell we could have closed out TB in game 6, but then lost the next 2. And what 4 shots in the 3rd of game 6?
How has it been bad? Most of our picks have been from the 2nd round on. The large majority of picks from those rounds take years to develop and most of our picks are 20-21 at the oldest. Most draft picks from the 2nd round on aren't in the NHL by that age. We have many prospects that are on the cusp of making the NHL including:Comes down to drafting and development. Because we have not been good at it, we have to go dumpster diving every summer to fill out the roster and we have yet to find a combination that can help us win a round. Hunter was bad but Dubas has been here the years Hunter was here and the years after Hunter left so it is not all on Hunter. Sandin and Lily are the closest and they were not good enough to play in game #7.
Putting aside any potential risks associated with the assumption, the Leafs are either taking on $10.5M or paying something quite grand to have Montreal retain for four seasons.Assuming he’s 100% healthy and ready to play, is there any possible way that the Leafs could acquire Carey Price?
Given that Simmonds is already signed for the 2022-2023 season and adds a dimension to the roster that nobody else does (some needed bite), I think some people are going to be disappointed when they see that he spends this final season in Toronto playing fairly regularly.It's time to move on.
Absolutely no way they are.
Their record this year vs good teams was stupid bad.
Roughly 7 million.
I agree. Knies is a much more promising prospect.Count me in on the Robertson is not going to amount to what most think he will. He is too tiny and has no balance which gets him injured all the time. He takes way too long to get his shot off because of his size (doesn't seem to bother Caulfield for some reason) and is pretty slow for a small guy. He looks like another Petan who scored like a maniac in junior or AHL but just can't do it in the NHL. I am 99% sure Knies will be a much better player than Robby. Sell now before everyone else figures out your holding a crappy hand.
I like him, I just don't think he's worth a roster spot at this point in his career. And certainly not if Spezza is backGiven that Simmonds is already signed for the 2022-2023 season and adds a dimension to the roster that nobody else does (some needed bite), I think some people are going to be disappointed when they see that he spends this final season in Toronto playing fairly regularly.
Or last year, or the year before......Our 4th line wasn't really doing much of anything out there this year.
Nope can't have him back. No surprise he wasn't effective in the playoffs after yet another concussionThe player that some people want to have have back, that I simply do not understand, is Kase... The guy has had like 38 concussions. He cannot take any kind of contact without missing time. This is not the top of guy you want battling for your team in a playoff environment.
How has it been bad? Most of our picks have been from the 2nd round on. The large majority of picks from those rounds take years to develop and most of our picks are 20-21 at the oldest. Most draft picks from the 2nd round on aren't in the NHL by that age. We have many prospects that are on the cusp of making the NHL including:
Robertson
Amirov (health)
Knies
Niemela
Holmberg
Anderson
Steeves
Kral
Abruzzese
Some of these guys are going to be challenging for a spot next year and some likely the year after. Abramov and Hirvonen I think might slowly develop into NHLers in another 2 or so years. With Dermott gone, Sandin should be a full timer now.
As for the Hunter drafts, sure Dubas was here but he was in charge of running the Marlies. Hunter was in charge of the draft. Putting partial blame for Hunter's failures doesn't make much sense if he isn't in charge of the draft table. The word is that Dubas wanted Debrincat at the Korshkov pick and Hunter overruled him for example. It's pretty clear that our prospect pool has been tracking much better under Dubas/Lilley than it was under Lou/Hunter.
Like I said we could be seeing positive results from the Dubas' drafting on the Leafs as soon as this coming season.
Also doesn't make sense to have a young Sandin coming back from injury over veterans Muzzin and Gio. Liljegren not playing was a decision by Keefe who decided to keep Holl in (mistake imo)
Our goaltending development has been pretty bad though. Scott was looking great but the poor kid can't stay off the IR.
He's incredibly fringe at this point, but I still think he finds his way into the lineup. He's not playing 70 regular season games, IMO, but don't be shocked if he plays 40. The contract is easily to burry, but I'm betting that Dubas / Keefe intend for him to play.I like him, I just don't think he's worth a roster spot at this point in his career. And certainly not if Spezza is back
Too much loss in guys like Hyman/Brown/Kadri/Kap/Johnsson/etc. with no good replacements. That’s a lot of depth and quality out the door.Tampa beefed up their bottom 6 at the TDL by adding Hagel and Paul (the jokers who laughed at Tampa TDL moves are eating crow once again). Meanwhile we could have LTIR'd Muzzin and added a top 6 winger to play with JT and chose not to.
Because you're simultaneously arguing with me no actual arguments of your own. Your whole schtick is, "Akshually, have you considered Gibson might me good?" after I've laid out my reasons for not thinking he will be particularly good. And then when I continue to provide evidence for why/why not to acquire particular goaltenders, you just go, "akshually, I don't have any opinion of any goaltenders, I never said who the right one was". If you don't have any views on these things, why are you discussing them on a discussion board?That's interesting because I don't recall stating an opinion on who the right goalie might be. But go ahead and tell me what my opinion of "the right goalie" is. Before you do though, consider this: you've used the phrase "But you might want to actually put some thought into your response first" a few times, perhaps you should heed your own advice.
So they have to give raises to some RFA's, so what? Sandin and Liljegren are both likely to improve way beyond what their salary increases are, that's something you might want to consider before deciding how our roster will look.
Even if we do have to pay to dump Mrazek, the price will likely be picks which has no impact on our roster.
But you might want to actually put some thought into your response first.![]()
I've actually thought about this as well. It would be a huge gamble for a number of reasons, especially with the overlap on the next Nylander/Marner/Matthews deals . That being said it could be an avenue to rid themselves of some contracts as well. Mrazek/Muzzin/Simmonds for example equal out exactly with the number Price makes. The Leafs would be forced to play Kallgren as the backup goaltender and would be solely relying on the health of an aging Price but that's a risk we have been used to the past few seasons. Interesting outside-the-box thought nonetheless.Putting aside any potential risks associated with the assumption, the Leafs are either taking on $10.5M or paying something quite grand to have Montreal retain for four seasons.
Possible? Sure. Realistic? Well...![]()
"Look worse". Because they will have to lose players off the roster due to cap considerations. I don't think they'll really be a worse team, because the core is very strong and the core is staying put.The roster doesn't have to look worse. That's what the GM is for. If he's wasting a 1st + decent prospect in Robertson to dump Mrazek, I want that money spent on something useful.
Giordano, Lyubushkin and Blackwell aren't needed. Even doing absolutely nothing, Rielly-Muzzin-Sandin and Brodie-Liljegren-Holl is tolerable as a top 6 (Holl is fine as a 3rd pair penaltykiller; that Keefe insists on playing him higher than that is an obvious issue that Dubas doesn't seem interested in fixing). Of course I want improvements, but goal is a higher priority. #3C option and D upgrades come next. If Kampf is still on a shutdown line then I want someone better than Spezza/Blackwell as the #3/4C. Kerfoot has been tried at C before and is no good at it at all, sorry to say.
As for who Dubas should target, meh. The Leafs have a half-dozen pro scouts, they can and will do the work. There's just no way I'm going to be excited if the answers are Puljujarvi and Holmberg.
Oh yeah we've seen the loyalty to vets regardless of playHe's incredibly fringe at this point, but I still think he finds his way into the lineup. He's not playing 70 regular season games, IMO, but don't be shocked if he plays 40. The contract is easily to burry, but I'm betting that Dubas / Keefe intend for him to play.
Count me in on the Robertson is not going to amount to what most think he will. He is too tiny and has no balance which gets him injured all the time. He takes way too long to get his shot off because of his size (doesn't seem to bother Caulfield for some reason) and is pretty slow for a small guy. He looks like another Petan who scored like a maniac in junior or AHL but just can't do it in the NHL. I am 99% sure Knies will be a much better player than Robby. Sell now before everyone else figures out your holding a crappy hand.
I'm pretty sure I have never suggested Gibson as a possibility.Because you're simultaneously arguing with me no actual arguments of your own. Your whole schtick is, "Akshually, have you considered Gibson might me good?" after I've laid out my reasons for not thinking he will be particularly good. And then when I continue to provide evidence for why/why not to acquire particular goaltenders, you just go, "akshually, I don't have any opinion of any goaltenders, I never said who the right one was". If you don't have any views on these things, why are you discussing them on a discussion board?
And by "look worse", I mean to say that it is simply factual that not every player on the roster in Game 7 will be able to return next season because of cap considerations. They will have to let players go or move them out just for cap space. I did not say the team will "be worse:"
Alright then dude. We cannot discuss anything here. Every goalie is simply Schrodinger's goalie. The salary cap is a figment of my imagination. You got it.