Depends on the night. I wouldn't call him consistent, and he can have some Jake Gardiner-esque misreads.Ceci and Del Zotto used to do that kind of thing. Can he play d?
Depends on the night. I wouldn't call him consistent, and he can have some Jake Gardiner-esque misreads.Ceci and Del Zotto used to do that kind of thing. Can he play d?
Hmmm thanks for the report back. Probably late teens early 20s by the way it sounds hes going this daysAnyone who doubts Wilde's poor defensive play should have been at tonight's NTDP game versus Madison. After about 23 minutes he had committed three major defensive screw-ups, one of which resulted in a Capitols goal. He has a lot of work to do on the defensive part of his game.
If he needs that much help in his defensive play, then what is the big deal about him? What has he been doing all these years as a Dman that never improved his defensive play? Every kid out there has potential and there are many kids out there that are less of a liability in the Dzone and just as fast with a hard shot that have not yet reached their full potential. BTW, I would make this same arguement for every prospect because I keep hearing that "kid AB" is getting drafted but has a lot to work on......" Why draft someone that has a lot to work on when undrafted players have less to work on?
Hmmm thanks for the report back. Probably late teens early 20s by the way it sounds hes going this days
Certain aspects of defensive play are as hard to teach as offensive play. For example, trying to change how good someone is at maintaining a proper gap and when to be aggressive are as tough as altering an offensive players vision or positioning (in regards to hockey IQ). Now, you can fix guys who tend to puck watch and play too aggressively taking the puck out the zone instead of making the simple play.Every player in the draft has stuff to work on. Every single one, including players who are NHL ready like Rasmus Dahlin.
The perfect player does not exist.
Teams should base drafting on the upside of a player 3-5 years from now, not what a player is today.
Certain things can be coached in a player, if they have the will to work at it. Others can't. Its hard to teach offense, but if a player has skating skill, and a good body, teaching defense is easier.
Every player in the draft has stuff to work on. Every single one, including players who are NHL ready like Rasmus Dahlin.
The perfect player does not exist.
Teams should base drafting on the upside of a player 3-5 years from now, not what a player is today.
Certain things can be coached in a player, if they have the will to work at it. Others can't. Its hard to teach offense, but if a player has skating skill, and a good body, teaching defense is easier.
Every kid out there has potential and there are many kids out there that are less of a liability in the Dzone and just as fast with a hard shot that have not yet reached their full potential.
So you think these teams are trying to intentionally sabotage their own interests? Maybe he has a friend on the management staff of all 31 teams?
Heck no, not at all but I do think that agents who are more connected than others have some kind of influence and are better marketers than others.
Thanks. Not looking or judging any kid to be perfect. Just curious as to why scouts/evaluators think some kids have more potential than others since it's mostly guessing & assuming.
It isn't an exact science by any means, but it isn't just guessing or assuming either.
There is a lot that goes into scouting a player, and seeing if he has skills that will translate or not.
Wilde's package of size, skating, shot, passing... he has a lot of the tools that teams are looking for.
Maybe I should have started a new thread about this because my posts are really not aimed specifically to this kid.
Seeing that there are more 1st rounds busts than success stories, I personally, I think a better indicator is drafting a kid much later (like as of age 22) since what you see at that age is more of reality of what you will be getting.
I need to watch Wilde in the U18, haven’t seen enough of him yet.
But many label a D a great skater if he is good at transporting the puck up ice. To have a good gap control, play good defense, it’s just about something completely else. Not even sure if they even can be described as related. It’s like comparing running 100 meters with dancing balette...
Seriously though, the big concern I have with Wilde is his quickness defensively. His foot speed, lateral movement. But — the kid is still really young. I think he is one of the harder kids to rank. It’s not at all unusual that kid develop his skating a lot after getting drafted. Slims down on body fat and just becomes more explosive. If Wilde does that he can make you look stupid.
It’s the same with a kid like Kupari. I am not that high on him. But if he improves his skating a lot and really finds another gear physically, becomes more explosive — he could become one of the better players in the draft. If not, he might find himself with a pretty brief NHL career. The marginals are not big.
One of those guys whose hockey IQ is terrible just because his decision making is so bad. Actually has some decent creativity on top of great physical tools, but his risk management is awful and defensively looks lost sometimes
Not equivalent at all. While talented he doesn't project to be even in the same world as those two. On top of that hughes is a guy with more of a subban/karlsson risk taker mentality. Wilde makes too many stupid low probability plays that even if they do work out aren't scoring plays. No problem with risks that can create dangerous chances, his IQ is poor because he makes high risk low reward plays too oftenAnd sometimes he looks great. I heard Subban and Karlsson IQ are terrible.
Not equivalent at all. While talented he doesn't project to be even in the same world as those two. On top of that hughes is a guy with more of a subban/karlsson risk taker mentality. Wilde makes too many stupid low probability plays that even if they do work out aren't scoring plays. No problem with risks that can create dangerous chances, his IQ is poor because he makes high risk low reward plays too often
I think he has the similar ability to quarterback an offence at even strength, questions about how he translates to the NHL are fair though. I do agree IQ is a bit of a broad and ambiguous thing, I think decision making is a big part of it though and thats an area I do not like in Wilde's game. Wilde has all the talent to prove me wrong, just skeptical of whether he can put it togetherUno, Hughes doesnt play the game like Subban or EK at all. Dos, its not about what they look like now, its about how theyll play in the big league. Wildes risk taking and his ability to defend when his team needs it is reminescent of AHL/OHL Subban. He doesnt lose his man as often as youd like to think, he does however pinch too often and at bad times, he does try to play too aggressively in the Dzone and the neutral. Those are not kinks in his "IQ" (such a bad and overused term BTW), theyre problems in his play style. Happens with kids who were always the best in their leagues and doesnt mean it cannoy be ironed out.
I think he has the similar ability to quarterback an offence at even strength, questions about how he translates to the NHL are fair though. I do agree IQ is a bit of a broad and ambiguous thing, I think decision making is a big part of it though and thats an area I do not like in Wilde's game. Wilde has all the talent to prove me wrong, just skeptical of whether he can put it together