I'm not pushing the nepotism thing, but the fact that we passed on one guy's son wouldn't disprove the nepotism angle as it pertains to another guy's son. Like, the Drury's might have specifically wanted to be parts of different organizations. I wouldn't want to work with my dad, you know? But maybe the Kjellberg's felt differently, and wanted to be part of the same organization.I can't believe people want to hate a front office so bad they have to cling on to the nepotism angle. Absurd, see: Drury, Jack.
I'm not suggesting that's what actually happened. It's just, people use the Drury thing as evidence that nepotism doesn't exist here. Just because it didn't in one instance doesn't mean it didn't in another. Hell, you could have a scenario where the Rangers wanted Drury but Dad said no. Who knows?