Overall this season, I'd group them this way:
Postive:
Lundkvist
Pajuniemi
Själin
Reunanen
Jones
Ciccolini
Neutral:
Edström
Húska
Lindbom
Tärnström
Rykov
Disappointing:
Aaltonen
Henriksson
Hájek
Kravtsov
Ciccolini has a couple goals which is great but has also been scratched twice in six games. So, IDK about him. SSS with him so it's too early to say.
Lindbom has a .902 SV% and 2.98 GAA in Allsvenskan. He's had a few good games but otherwise his overall performance has been poor, as it has been since we drafted him.
I'd drop both of them a tier. I'm also a bit disappointed that Tarnstrom hasn't stood out more in J20. It's put him Neutral, Leans Disappointing. LOL.
I'd maybe label it and break it down like:
Stock Rising: Sjalin
Stock Neutral: Lundkvist, Pajuniemi, Reunanen, Tarnstrom, Ollas
Stock Falling: Aaltonen, Edstrom, Hajek, Henriksson, Kravtsov, Ragnarsson, Rykov, Lindbom
Too Early: Jones, Ciccolini, Huska
The guys in the "neutral" category--they are like "meets expectations. Lundkvist is having a solid if unspectacular season; it's a good year but it's generally what I expected and doesn't move the needle either way.
I'm torn on where to place Edstrom. What little I've seen he's looked pretty good, and did earn that look on the top line for a couple games, but has otherwise been stuck on the fourth line without much production. And, as mentioned, Tarnstrom having 8 points in 12 games in J20--6th on his team in PPG and a lower rate than he posted last year. Not impressive.
This is why depth is good to have; even "good" prospects still fail at a high rate. Also, much like real stocks, they can turn around pretty quickly. A month ago and Kravtsov is big time in the "rising" category, for example.