Prospect Info: Rangers Prospect Thread (Player Stats/Info in Post #1; Updated 1.12.21)

Status
Not open for further replies.

bobbop

Henrik & Pop
Sponsor
May 27, 2004
14,553
21,187
Now, Suburban Phoenix. Then, Long Island
He is too small and he'll never play a game for the Rangers. Learn what type of teams win cups. Teams who win cups don't have 3 or 4 small, offensive defenseman. It never works. Ever. The left side of our defense will be made up of Miller, Lindgren, either Robertson or Hajek. The right side probably will be Schneider, Fox and Lundkvist. They will never carry more than two 5'10 d man this team. Not with JD running it. I don't believe Tampa had a dman under 6 feet last year. Same for St. Louis the year before. Your type of thinking is how AV thought. Which is why our defense sucked more and more. His thinking was, put small, quick skating puck moving defenseman out there. Those types don't win playoff series unless you limit them to one or two surrounded by big defenseman.
Paging Jacob Trouba
 

usekakkorightquinn

Registered User
Oct 18, 2019
1,026
503
We have fans so delusional here they think our defense will have Reunanen, Jones, Fox, Lundkvist and DeAngelo on it. Welcome to the land of the short and small that can't ever clear the crease.
 

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,007
40,717
We have fans so delusional here they think our defense will have Reunanen, Jones, Fox, Lundkvist and DeAngelo on it. Welcome to the land of the short and small that can't ever clear the crease.

You're acting as if this fanbase isn't excited about Miller, Robertson and Schneider
 
  • Like
Reactions: RGY

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,007
40,717
Liiga is postponing all games between 12/3 and 12/26 in an effort to battle the recent increase in COVID cases.

No games for Lauri and Tarmo, and the speculation about Kakko being loaned to TPS can be put to rest as well
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,134
34,144
Maryland
Edstrom was +1 in 12:56 of TOI.

Henriksson was -1 with 2 SOG in about 16 minutes. Not bad considering his team lost 8-0.

Lundkvist had no stats, outside 2 hits, in 18:53.

No stats for Sjalin in 16:19.

Kravtsov -1 in 20:21.

Rykov +1 in 14:23.
 

Amazing Kreiderman

Registered User
Apr 11, 2011
45,007
40,717
Edstrom was +1 in 12:56 of TOI.

Henriksson was -1 with 2 SOG in about 16 minutes. Not bad considering his team lost 8-0.

Lundkvist had no stats, outside 2 hits, in 18:53.

No stats for Sjalin in 16:19.

Kravtsov -1 in 20:21.

Rykov +1 in 14:23.

Libor Hájek was a whopping -4 in a 6-2 loss. Not a great day for our prospects
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
Overall this season, I'd group them this way:

Postive:
Lundkvist
Pajuniemi
Själin
Reunanen
Jones
Ciccolini

Neutral:
Edström
Húska
Lindbom
Tärnström
Rykov

Disappointing:
Aaltonen
Henriksson
Hájek
Kravtsov

I also think people need to realize that if we're fortunate, maybe about 1/3 of the names on any given snapshot of our prospect list will actually play in the NHL or have an impact for us --- and that's with a farm system that is widely seen as being no worse than top 10 at the moment.

I don't know if people fully accept that we'll be doing very well if 12 of our top 20 prospects fail to make the NHL.
 

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,134
34,144
Maryland
Overall this season, I'd group them this way:

Postive:
Lundkvist
Pajuniemi
Själin
Reunanen
Jones
Ciccolini

Neutral:
Edström
Húska
Lindbom
Tärnström
Rykov

Disappointing:
Aaltonen
Henriksson
Hájek
Kravtsov
Ciccolini has a couple goals which is great but has also been scratched twice in six games. So, IDK about him. SSS with him so it's too early to say.

Lindbom has a .902 SV% and 2.98 GAA in Allsvenskan. He's had a few good games but otherwise his overall performance has been poor, as it has been since we drafted him.

I'd drop both of them a tier. I'm also a bit disappointed that Tarnstrom hasn't stood out more in J20. It's put him Neutral, Leans Disappointing. LOL.

I'd maybe label it and break it down like:

Stock Rising: Sjalin
Stock Neutral: Lundkvist, Pajuniemi, Reunanen, Tarnstrom, Ollas
Stock Falling: Aaltonen, Edstrom, Hajek, Henriksson, Kravtsov, Ragnarsson, Rykov, Lindbom
Too Early: Jones, Ciccolini, Huska

The guys in the "neutral" category--they are like "meets expectations. Lundkvist is having a solid if unspectacular season; it's a good year but it's generally what I expected and doesn't move the needle either way.

I'm torn on where to place Edstrom. What little I've seen he's looked pretty good, and did earn that look on the top line for a couple games, but has otherwise been stuck on the fourth line without much production. And, as mentioned, Tarnstrom having 8 points in 12 games in J20--6th on his team in PPG and a lower rate than he posted last year. Not impressive.

This is why depth is good to have; even "good" prospects still fail at a high rate. Also, much like real stocks, they can turn around pretty quickly. A month ago and Kravtsov is big time in the "rising" category, for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband and bl02

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,134
34,144
Maryland
If anyone was curious, Lias Andersson has an underwhelming line of 3-4-7 in 13 games played at the moment. His team lost to Edström's team today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,142
23,590
Unfortunately I feel like this is what our updates look like every day. Goose eggs across the board.
It sure seems that way. I think bottom line is we are gonna just have to show patience even with guys who we think have lots potential like Kravtsov because they just right now they don't look close to being ready to crack the big club.
Hoping we get to see someone like Berard surprise us and have a good WJC.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,142
23,590
I also think people need to realize that if we're fortunate, maybe about 1/3 of the names on any given snapshot of our prospect list will actually play in the NHL or have an impact for us --- and that's with a farm system that is widely seen as being no worse than top 10 at the moment.

I don't know if people fully accept that we'll be doing very well if 12 of our top 20 prospects fail to make the NHL.

Just not good if we have Lias (failure) and Kravtsov bust. Having back to back top 10 picks fail is not very good. Hopefully Kakko and Lafreniere are what we expect and more but not sure I can give credit since those were obvious picks.
Time will tell I guess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HatTrick Swayze

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,321
4,664
Surprised to see the opinions on Kravtsov’s stock falling. To me, it crashed very hard last season and we have at least seen some signs of life. He’s had had good chances since the early hot streak. A 20/21 year old finishing above 0.5 ppg in the KHL and showing flashes of brilliance would be a fine rebound.
 

apoptygma

2-5-9-11
Apr 9, 2011
516
379
For Edström just playing the SHL is positive for me. If he is able to stay in the line-up all season I would be very happy with him. A small improvement in offensive out put this year and he is right on the "Jesper Fast" track for a late pick-becoming NHL role-player track.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

nyr2k2

Can't Beat Him
Jul 30, 2005
46,134
34,144
Maryland
Surprised to see the opinions on Kravtsov’s stock falling. To me, it crashed very hard last season and we have at least seen some signs of life. He’s had had good chances since the early hot streak. A 20/21 year old finishing above 0.5 ppg in the KHL and showing flashes of brilliance would be a fine rebound.
Eh he has 12 points in 25 games. Two seasons ago when he was 18/19 he had 21 points in 50 games on a terrible team that literally couldn't score (102 goals in 62 games). Now he's running just three points ahead of that pace on a dramatically better team while two years older ? I'd rather see consistent offensive production than flashes of brilliance. He could easily pick up the pace and boost his stock, but I'm looking at the season as a whole and at the moment, I don't see it as a positive relative to what he has already done.
For Edström just playing the SHL is positive for me. If he is able to stay in the line-up all season I would be very happy with him. A small improvement in offensive out put this year and he is right on the "Jesper Fast" track for a late pick-becoming NHL role-player track.
Last year was the "just being in the SHL is great!" season for Edstrom, IMO. It was a surprise when he made the team and a surprise that he stuck. He was expected to make the team this year. He's running a hair above his production from last year. Jesper Fast went from 16 points in 36 games in his D+1 season to 16 in 21 his D+2 season before that awful broken ankle. Fast was substantially ahead of Edstrom in every facet of the game other than physical play. I'm not sure how they're following the same track, other than surprising in their D+1 season. The magnitude of what Fast did is far greater than what Edstrom has done.

I don't think Edstrom's season is bad, by any means, and I would definitely consider him for the "neutral stock" label. But, I was hoping he'd take a bit more of a step forward--like it appeared he might be doing when they pushed him up the lineup for a couple games. He's getting good TOI which is positive but I want to see production. 1+1 in a game against Farjestad and 1 point in his other 10 games. IDK, maybe I'm being a tad harsh on him but I don't see his stock as having improved at all, to this point. Neutral at best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband

True Blue

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
30,092
8,362
Visit site
I'd maybe label it and break it down like:

Stock Rising: Sjalin
Stock Neutral: Lundkvist, Pajuniemi, Reunanen, Tarnstrom, Ollas
Stock Falling: Aaltonen, Edstrom, Hajek, Henriksson, Kravtsov, Ragnarsson, Rykov, Lindbom
Too Early: Jones, Ciccolini, Huska
Think you may be onto something with the stock tracker.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbour Dog

NYSPORTS

back afta dis. . .
Jun 17, 2019
7,993
4,459
For Edström just playing the SHL is positive for me. If he is able to stay in the line-up all season I would be very happy with him. A small improvement in offensive out put this year and he is right on the "Jesper Fast" track for a late pick-becoming NHL role-player track.

. . . has to fill out but has a lot of Brian Boyle in him. Towering guy on skates.
 

Edge

Kris King's Ghost
Mar 1, 2002
34,749
42,578
Amish Paradise
Just not good if we have Lias (failure) and Kravtsov bust. Having back to back top 10 picks fail is not very good. Hopefully Kakko and Lafreniere are what we expect and more but not sure I can give credit since those were obvious picks.
Time will tell I guess.

I just think we're waaaay too early for that.

Kravtsov really isn't busting yet. What he is doing is providing doubts as to whether he's going hit the high-end ceiling people hoped for.

But there are many levels between high-end ceiling and failure. It's not that black and white.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,310
8,988
Overall this season, I'd group them this way:

Postive:
Lundkvist
Pajuniemi
Själin
Reunanen
Jones
Ciccolini

Neutral:
Edström
Húska
Lindbom
Tärnström
Rykov

Disappointing:
Aaltonen
Henriksson
Hájek
Kravtsov

Really surprised you put Kravtsov in the disappointing category. Personally I'd put him in the positive category though I can see how some could view his performance as neutral. But you have Rykov and Tarnstrom in the neutral - two prospects that IMO are way more likely to be viewed so far as disappointing than Kravtsov even with a difference in level of expectations.

Yes, he recently got on a cold streak (after a super hot start) but he had an injury break in-between that surely contributed, he still gets positive reviews from the coaching stuff and teammates during this streak, and he continue to be Traktors' top winger both in line assignments and ice time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad