I wanted Torts GONE a few games into the Washington series when I understood that while our team could play really good hockey under him in the reg. season, he immediately strangles the life out of the team in the playoffs by enforcing his system to an absurd level.
I could see us winning the East in the reg. season again under Torts, but I could never see us winning a cup under him, that's why he had to go.
These are my thoughts regarding your points:
I'm just not sure how anyone could be a BIG fan of Torts after his time here.
Torts fans must agree/like the following:
1. Chris Kreider, at best, is a plug-in NHL 4th liner
Pretty much, he has yet to how that he can be an effective NHL player at a consistent basis. Plays way too tentatively, and has been poor defensively. He has looked like Evgeny Grachev.
2. Brian Boyle can be used in every game situation andis a top-6 forward
Boyle is no top-6 player, but an effective defensive center that can handle a 3rd line role if the line is deployed correctly. Not a traditional PP player and shouldn't be a PP regular, but he somehow worked there in the PO's and all PP goals we scored in the postseason were socred with Boyle on the ice. Can't blame Torts for going with what worked.
3. Block all shots so your Vezina winning goaltender doesn't have to
Agreed, idiotic. Kills our transition game as well. The thing was that during the reg. season there was a lot less collapsing going on, and lo and behold we were actually regularly outplaying our opposition 5v5. But that changed in the POs.
4. DON'T practice offense, it is an unnecessary part of hockey
I can agree that offence is a more creative endavour than defence and therefore should be practised less as the effect is probably less, but to not practice it altogether is stupid I agree.
5. Once the puck carrier gets passed the red line, he must dump in and chase
You need the players to pull this off effectively though, and Torts didn't have this initially. But his failing was to not change his gameplan dependent on the players, because he actually got some guys capable of doing this. Torts can also be blamed for not trying to move the team in a direction where we have more players capable of carrying in the puck, and instead building the entire team around the dump and chase mindset.
6. Don't worry about puck possession, its another unimportant factor
We were actually one of the top possession teams in the league this reg. season, but I agree that Torts seemed to underrate possession. His coaching philosophy is still stuck in the trapping days and centered around not losing the puck in the wrong areas under any circumstance, get it below the hashmarks at any cost.
7. Make fun of/bench/send down/demoralize all your young/ up and coming players
etc.
Torts was a sideshow and more of a distraction than a head coach.
Torts did less of this than most people make him out to have done. Kreider didn't merit the role some fans seem to want to be gifted. Miller got to stay up WAY longer than what I thought he deserved. Hagelin's game doesn't translate well to the PP, he could've been less blunt whe speaking about it, but it is true. Speaking of Hagelin, you mean the guy who went from the AHL to the 1st line in a metter of ~6 weeks? That doesn't sound like a rookie not being given a chance.