LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
- Jun 17, 2010
- 47,417
- 16,046
As they should because the team that I saw last night outside of the final 2 minutes when they pulled the goalie was not a threat at any other point.
Bern my friend your alway welcome to make a offer just remember I can always refuse and counter
Schneider + Kravstov? Too much Not enough? I like all tree players and think there's value for both teams hereIf NYR want to go in, Miller for Schneider + would make sense.
Just waiting for bern to come in and tell me they can't trade the bluest of blue chip prospects
I surprised this is from a Kings fan. I would think Valardi carries more value than a defense first LHD. If that is identified as the missing piece I guess it might be worth it, just from reading any thread where Valardi's name is brought up, most King fans want to see what he can become.Vilardi for Lindgren
Miller + Schenn + 3rd for Kravtsov & Lundqvist?
You’re not getting either for Millerno thanks to Lundkvist, he just doesn’t do anything for us. It needs to work for us too, that’s Schneider.
You’re not getting either for Miller
Any chance the cap goes up?How expensive a cap hit can the Rangers take on? They have around $10 mill available for next season but need a backup goalie and like 6 forwards. D seems set. So that’s 7 more players to fit in at $10 mill.
maybe Nemeth at $2.5 and Reeves at $1.75 can be moved but I think they like everyone else.
Could find a forward for cheaper than Buchnevich's 6-7m (I forget which it is)I don't buy this Dreger BS a single second.
So we have a GM that trades away Buchnevich and send Kravtsov home,
just to trade for a forward a little later.
Buch was unfortunate but it was penny pinching earlier rather than later
and don't defend Kravtsov just because he scores flashy highlight reel goals on open KHL ice, the dude is a f***ing dolt and couldn't see through the grass. He still has value thankfully because idiot fans think he's going to be a savior because he's all flash.
Monahan will be a Ranger. It is inevitable.
I surprised this is from a Kings fan. I would think Valardi carries more value than a defense first LHD. If that is identified as the missing piece I guess it might be worth it, just from reading any thread where Valardi's name is brought up, most King fans want to see what he can become.
Could find a forward for cheaper than Buchnevich's 6-7m (I forget which it is)
We traded him for no reason, well, future cap casualty. But they could've just traded him at the deadline or after the season, there was no reason to rush that trade (which was lackluster, and I like Blais). I guess Drury thought he'd get Eichel or he's just a dummy. I'm leaning towards dummy.Pavel Buchnevich sounds like a good fit.
Unless St.Louis retain at least $2-3M or the Rangers can't send someone with term that makes a lot of $ back, that trade ain't happening.Tarasenko has played 16 games this year and in about 14 of them he looked genuinely dangerous. Shots and shot attempts are high. He is putting doubts to rest about his injury. There was talk of interest over the summer but the recently reported Blues asking price was something like 1st + high prospect + roster player.
Mindful that many Blues fans will be happy keeping him, and will probably pop in to say the Blues should keep him, I’m curious what the current NYR offer would be.
LAK's #1 need is a top pairing left shot two-way/shut down type of defensemen.I surprised this is from a Kings fan. I would think Valardi carries more value than a defense first LHD. If that is identified as the missing piece I guess it might be worth it, just from reading any thread where Valardi's name is brought up, most King fans want to see what he can become.