This is another place I question Cherington. Yes he has to dive in the dumpster pile, but is amazing how often his guys are sub-replacement level. Bad even by dumpster standards.
Maybe not the most important thing, but more questions of ability to evaluate and develop MLB hitting. Something to monitor going forward, because let's be real there will be many more dumpster dives
This is flat out bullshit and I'm going to call bullshit out. Not to mention, you can go across the sport and look at other teams who have no money to spend, and don't hit lightning in a bottle often, either.
1 WAR is literally worth 7 mil per on the open market, IIRC. Our biggest signing this off season was Quintana, no? At what? 2M for a single year. For half a seasons worth of worth (meaning roughly 1M spent) he got us a top 10 prospect (at a position of need) from an org. that knows how to scout and develop, and an ML ready arm, that profiles well as a back end reliever down the line.
Nutting is giving Cherington enough money to sign exactly that, replacement level players. It's simple f***ing math and I shouldn't have to spend time typing out these facts. 3 out of 4 of these guys are going to flop. Why? Because they're being paid to not be good. If they were better, they'd get more money. When one does pop, it's gravy but you can't expect many to do that.
Despite that, we've seen in the past 2 years, players making pennies on the dollar remember:
Nogowski wasn't crap. Alford wasn't. Neither were plus guys by the book, but they weren't awful either. Yoshi was quite good, last year. Hell, even Wilmer Difo produced replacement level #'s. Tyler Anderson. And what did we get to spend on them?
Gamel's been solid, better than 0. Chavis has. Vogey was a plus player, that we turned into a possible plus in the BP. Beede has been a very solid arm in the pen. These are dirt cheap players. Being paid to produce like 0.1-0.2 WAR.
The amount of people who cannot separate the owner from the GM when it comes to ability to spend, is astounding. OR understand there is a difference between a 1M FA and a 10 or 20M guy. Expectations. Heard of it?
Do you (others) honestly expect a third, half or more than half of the players we sign for 750K, 1M, 2M max, to be really productive ball players?
If we were signing guys for 3/45 or hell, even 3/25, and they were negative WAR players, then you can start truly complaining. Those are types you are expecting to be good or at least above average.
Like I said, we've got issues that need rectified (more SP, 1B, C, new coaching staff) between now and next winter, but flat out BS is not going to fly while I'm around.