News Article: Rachel Doerrie has left the Canucks

[Peen]

For what it's worth, Doerrie's Linked in page still indicates that she works for the Canucks.

Also think that there’s been a lot of people rushing to assume why/what happened when we don’t even know what the result is.

All we have right now is Dhaliwal/Taylor’s exchange, a quickly deleted Quadrelli tweet, and Doerrie’s likes on Twit

 

[StreetHawk]

Last company I worked for clearly knew who wrote a glassdoor review based on location and position and proceeded to "quite firing" as a means to get rid of him.

Shows the kind of world that we live in. When I was looking for another job from that lousy company, only the people that I trusted knew that I was sending out resumes.

But I wouldn’t think of writing a glass door review while still employed there. Even leaving the company I wouldn’t do that.

Think about who your reference will be from the company if you are going to use one from there. I wouldn’t write a glass door review unless that person was gone from the company.

At most I’d write something more general. That the company tends to play favorites when doing promotions. It’s a place to gain some experience but limited opportunities to advance after a year. Kind of know your place by then. Be general, not specific.

But people today like to spill everything on social media and the internet. Just no understanding of the potential future consequences. All living in the moment.

 

[Deeds26]

Also think that there’s been a lot of people rushing to assume why/what happened when we don’t even know what the result is.

All we have right now is Dhaliwal/Taylor’s exchange, a quickly deleted Quadrelli tweet, and Doerrie’s likes on Twit

I think based on that tweet, we can assume it has something to do with the Aquilini legal issues. Since the tweet happened this afternoon, and not last night when she got "fired." So why would she like the tweet if that was not the reason she was let go.

I am assuming that there was a meeting held last night to go over the news article, where she probably said something that crossed the line enough to be let go.

Obviously, assuming she was fired, and this isn't just a weird rumor going around for no reason.

 

[Peen]

I think based on that tweet, we can assume it has something to do with the Aquilini legal issues. Since the tweet happened this afternoon, and not last night when she got "fired." So why would she like the tweet if that was not the reason she was let go.

I am assuming that there was a meeting held last night to go over the news article, where she probably said something that crossed the line enough to be let go.

But we cannot assume that. I don’t think that’s a reasonable jump at all. I think it is dangerous, honestly

 

[Canucks LB]

What in the blue moon is going on

 

[Peen]

If anyone looks at the podcast and wants to hear what Dhali said, 14:55-15:35 of today’s Donnie & Dhali show

 

[krutovsdonut]

i am not sure she will thrive in the new job even if she is really good at it. she's either going to have to abandon the public profile she has worked hard to build and put those talents on a shelf, or figure out a way to square it with an entry level hockey job. the latter will be a challenge because she does seem to lack a filter, and does seem prone to get into gossip. she will be at high risk of a blaze of glory departure.

bottom line, we make allowances for 40 year old ex pros who become hockey media folks and have to figure it out. i think we can make allowances for a 25 year old. i will be rooting for her.

aannd here we are.

 

[joelCAMEL]

Also think that there’s been a lot of people rushing to assume why/what happened when we don’t even know what the result is.

All we have right now is Dhaliwal/Taylor’s exchange, a quickly deleted Quadrelli tweet, and Doerrie’s likes on Twit

If she is still employed by the team, then my opinion remains unchanged, about lack of communications skills and poor judgement. I had been waiting to see if the team would reveal any improvements she had made to the analytics department, but she has been out of the spotlight since her hire.

 

[gringo]

Young people with less than zero life experience who come in acting like they know better than everyone rub people the wrong way. No surprise.

 

[Killer Orcas]

If anyone looks at the podcast and wants to hear what Dhali said, 14:55-15:35 of today’s Donnie & Dhali show

It's kinda strange to listen to Dhaliwal there in that he seems really freaked out about what he heard last night. He did not want to comment on it at all. Now I'm really curious what the heck is going on.

 

[gringo]

"Don't virtue hire, hire based on merit alone."

The OBC exists. We went through 7 years of mediocrity based on a hiring that should have never ever happened. If we hired based on merit, many NHL GM's (ie. Fletcher) would be unemployed.

The OBC is wrong but so is hiring for the sake of being woke.

 

[wonton15]

What did Quadrelli tweet and delete?

 

[SeawaterOnIce]

The OBC is wrong but so is hiring for the sake of being woke.

Tell me why a person like this wasn't qualified to work here:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rachel-doerrie-2063bb93/

 

[gringo]

Tell me why a person like this wasn't qualified to work here:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/rachel-doerrie-2063bb93/details/experience/

Page not found

 

[Deeds26]

But we cannot assume that. I don’t think that’s a reasonable jump at all. I think it is dangerous, honestly

I'd agree with you, if we were accusing her for criminal activity or being a racist/sexist/transphobic or any other -ist.

But this is just speculating and assuming on a forum about how she lost her job, so it isn't that dangerous to sit here and try to put pieces of the puzzle together.

The evidence we have right now is:
- Article comes out last night detailing legal issues with Aquilini and accusing him of abuse
- Employee is rumored to be fired last night
- Employee likes a tweet this afternoon about billionaires not needing to be defended by public people

Yes, we do not know the full facts, and there is a good chance we never do, but her livelihood is in no risk of being damaged based on these assumptions.

 

[Peen]

I'd agree with you, if we were accusing her for criminal activity or being a racist/sexist/transphobic or any other -ist.

But this is just speculating and assuming on a forum about how she lost her job, so it isn't that dangerous to sit here and try to put pieces of the puzzle together.

The evidence we have right now is:
- Article comes out last night detailing legal issues with Aquilini and accusing him of abuse
- Employee is rumored to be fired last night
- Employee likes a tweet this afternoon about billionaires not needing to be defended by public people

Yes, we do not know the full facts, and there is a good chance we never do, but her livelihood is in no risk of being damaged based on these assumptions.

I think otherwise because Doerrie already has received a lot of backlash for beliefs - whether in some cases it’s valid or not - that she’s “insubordinate, loud, etc.”

So speculating on something like that is the dangerous part because even if this is all hunky dorrie - it’s still adding onto those beliefs.

I do agree it is not the exact same or as bad as the situations you cited - but I still don’t think it is fair.

I also am really confused as to why the team has not put out a statement or something, but it is what it is. Maybe they’re trying to resolve something.

Hoping vector gives me props on my hunky dory pun

What did Quadrelli tweet and delete?

Paraphrasing (relatively accurate paraphrase) “Working to confirm the Doerrie rumour” and then deleted within a minute

 

[bobbyb2009]

I wouldn't be surprised if it was something like that... but holy how petty would that be.

It turns out, her liking the tweet may have been after she was allegedly fired. However, I don't see it as petty at all. If I owned a company, and an employee of mine was publicly and actively shaming me, I would fire that employee immediately!! And I would be completely justified in doing so, especially in the case of my business being one of sports and entertainment, where the brand is clearly linked to me. She didn't have to support him privately or publicly, but shaming him with the like is a red line I would most certainly draw!!

Edit: I am most certainly not defending Aqua's actions in his personal life.

 

[Timmer44]

- Employee likes a tweet this afternoon about billionaires not needing to be defended by public people

I think we're glossing over Wyatt's tweet. Is he insinuating that media members are on FA's payroll?

 

[racerjoe]

I think we're glossing over Wyatt's tweet. Is he insinuating that media members are on FA's payroll?

I don't know at all but I am guessing it was in reference to the Mason tweet I think it was saying it never happened around me so it must not have happened... guessing though.

 

[Deeds26]

I think we're glossing over Wyatt's tweet. Is he insinuating that media members are on FA's payroll?

I read it more as the fact that billionaires can afford to pay a PR team to help out with defending him, not that he is paying media people or that he needs help from the public to do so.

So speculating on something like that is the dangerous part because even if this is all hunky dorrie - it’s still adding onto those beliefs.

It is a solid 10/10 on the pun.

 

[God]

I don't like this at all, but I'm hoping there's a silver lining in which Aquilini is forced to sell the team.

 

[bobbyb2009]

I don't like this at all, but I'm hoping there's a silver lining in which Aquilini is forced to sell the team.

I here this a lot, and I even feel it. Having said that, what keeps coming to mind is "be careful what we wish for." For example, a new owner might not spend to the cap, or worse, be like the Grizzlies and jump out of here one day.

Change in ownership scares me unless we know who that owner is.

 

[StreetHawk]

It turns out, her liking the tweet may have been after she was allegedly fired. However, I don't see it as petty at all. If I owned a company, and an employee of mine was publicly and actively shaming me, I would fire that employee immediately!! And I would be completely justified in doing so, especially in the case of my business being one of sports and entertainment, where the brand is clearly linked to me. She didn't have to support him privately or publicly, but shaming him with the like is a red line I would most certainly draw!!

Edit: I am most certainly not defending Aqua's actions in his personal life.

The under 30 people today seem to think that there are no consequences for their actions.

You can criticize your employer but don’t do it in a public forum that can be traced back to you.

But clearly she wanted it out there.

Whether the team has cause or not depends on the wording of her employment contract. Someone in her role in which you don’t want people to hand you 2 weeks notice will have a contract. More detailed than for an employee in accounting or sales.

 

[gringo]

The under 30 people today seem to think that there are no consequences for their actions.

You can criticize your employer but don’t do it in a public forum that can be traced back to you.

But clearly she wanted it out there.

Whether the team has cause or not depends on the wording of her employment contract. Someone in her role in which you don’t want people to hand you 2 weeks notice will have a contract. More detailed than for an employee in accounting or sales.

If Being woke is more important than being employed so be it

I here this a lot, and I even feel it. Having said that, what keeps coming to mind is "be careful what we wish for." For example, a new owner might not spend to the cap, or worse, be like the Grizzlies and jump out of here one day.

Change in ownership scares me unless we know who that owner is.

CCP angbang special!

 

[StreetHawk]

If Being woke is more important than being employed so be it


CCP angbang special!

This is a public dismal. People can choose to leave out a short employment and explain the gap as “travel or taking a break” or something when they do Not know where you recently worked.

People will call the Canucks and ask what happened.