Lowry created a "me" attitude in a "we" tournament.
Double shifted favorites.
Had guys playing 2-3 minute shifts.
Did not reward players playing well.
Never benched guys who were un-disciplined.
Never benched guys playing bad.
When Canada rolled 4 lines and 3 pairings, we looked fast and good. As soon as he double shifted his favorites or let them gave 2 minute shifts, they looked awful. And today, his favorites looked good at times, and lost us the game at other times.
Certainly fueled him to have the worst tournament in WJC historyLove the Virtanen hate !! It fuels a kid like this.
He will be even more hated in the NHL when he is actually allowed to mack truck some of these midget prospects.
Actually it stands for THE SPORTS NETWORK.
But wouldn't expect an american to know that...
Why is Brayden Point lackluster performance through the tournament not getting attention?
As the Captain and returnee I for one expected a LOT more.
Konecny, Strome, Marner were our best forwards, really let down by all the forward returnees.
Actually it stands for THE SPORTS NETWORK.
But wouldn't expect an american to know that...
Absolutely abysmal coaching by Lowry. Never got the message across about discipline which is what cost them.
Did anyone actually think that? They're insane if so.
I didn't see the interview but Hicketts is a dopeHicketts sure knows how to conduct himself in an interview
Very exciting game, but not a very good game. Too many goals scored in both ends because of defensive mistakes and bad goaltending instead of creative offensive play.
Just my opinion, of course - many will disagree.
Of course I am.
It seems the only responses are the reffing is always bad so Canada should adapt or personal attacks, so if that is the best people have there is really no reason to change my thinking.
The IIHF has repeatedly shown us they are a biased and corrupt organization with incompetent referees.
Canada brings in the majority of the money and has by far the best players so why to we put up with a group that continually tries to screw us?
As much as they tried to play it off it was clear Point was injured.
That's why he would get a bit of a pass from me not sure about other people though.
Edit:
As for returnees I thought Crouse was really good all tournment long. He may not have had the highs of Marner and Strome but I think he was our most consistent forward all tournament long.
No blame should be put on Marner, even if it was a stupid penalty. Marner was great in this game.
Finland's trio of Laine, Puljujarvi, Juolevi were outstanding. Just didn't see any Canadian equivalents.
Laine looks like an absolute beast. What a gem
Have to wonder whether or not there's much separating him and Matthews
No blame should be put on Marner, even if it was a stupid penalty. Marner was great in this game.
Certainly fueled him to have the worst tournament in WJC history
Bodes well for the Canucks IMO
LOL... Aren't you slightly embarrassed?Why should we adapt and not just start our own tournament with legit reffing?
I never understand this thinking from international apologists like Ferraro.
If the ref is crap then it should be changed especially when the IIHF would be nothing without Canada and we would be just fine if we started a new, non-corrupt organization.
Today the Perlini, 3 Virtanen calls and the Marner calls were all horsecrap calls. The Hicketts call was a joke because there is no way they should be playing in a joke of rink with that glass but not the refs fault.
The Finns won pretty much 100% to PP goals scored on those calls. The Finns didn't make good plays, didn't force Canada into mistakes didn't play better in any way.
Those calls changed the game and the outcome of the game and saying "they should adapt to the crappy, biased reffing" seems moronic to me. There shouldn't be crappy and biased reffing to start with if this is supposed to be a world Class organization.