Yeah im gonna trust advanced stats rather than the eye test of thadd from HFBoards, thanks.
This is the big disconnect with Puljujarvi.
Fancies say he's great, but how much of that is making many good plays in transition to increase overall possession time, overall higher shot counts, and eventually goals while playing with one of the two best players in the league most of the time.
I don't see him making a lot of plays that lead to goals, he's adequate in the cycle, fairly weak on the boards, and other than being a big body in the crease looks completely lost when it comes to scoring chances and setting up teammates.
If you compare Puljujarvi and Yamamoto when both played on the first line, Yamamoto is much more engaged in working with linemates and active with purpose in scoring areas. Also compare how Kane and McDavid play off each other and how Puljujarvi plays with each of them.
How much of this is the usual stat-oriented biases towards rush offense, where Pujujarvi seems a little better overall than in the cycle? Seems to me Puljujarvi is very good at areas where he can be a big guy who can skate and disrupt opposition and push forward possession but not very good at finesse plays which lead to numbers on the scoreboard.