Thoughts, ranked in order of good to bad:
Firstly, I understand why the coaching staff does it, but I HATE these games where they run out 12 out of 20 guys who are on the cusp simply to see what they have. C'mon, make the obvious cuts and let's get down to the brass tacks.
Anyhoo...
Impressed me:
SKJEI - best player on the ice for the Rangers. To have such a combo of skill, speed, and power...
CHYTIL – unbelievable skill. Had the first assist on the only goal, plus multiple other chances, not lacking in strength, and plays a surprisingly aware defensive game (also seems to be really good at FOs). Give the man his 9 games at the very least.
BUCHNEVICH - much better game. Possession we're used to seeing and instrumental on some of the great passing plays where they came close, but never did put it in. Also, thought he was more aware in the D-zone. Can't wait to see him this year.
VESEY - solid game. Looks to have taken a step forward. More assertive as opposed to simply reactive. If he can simply add 10% to what he did last year, that's a big deal.
NELL - only one period, but I was super impressed with his positioning and how big he made himself seem between the pipes. The save on the breakaway was textbook.
Okay/up-and-down:
HAYES - not as assertive as his first game, but still the same general style I'm hoping to see. One offseason to lose weight, another to get more assertive. Overall positive.
MILLER - felt like he was more tentative this game, but also felt like he was trying to provide leadership with Chytil and Buch on his line. Not worthy of top category performance, but very much a positive to see. I was pleased.
LETTIERI - after two bad periods to start his debut, four good periods to show some positive energizer bunny play, with excellent speed and a good shot. I think he's got an NHL future, potentially even on the 3rd line.
DEANGELO - great start, but fell like he tried to do a little too much and fell off towards the end. Wonder if he was somewhat the victim of the number of lesser forwards the Rangers dressed not giving his rush game much to work with. Love the confidence with the puck; occasionally have to close my eyes when he gets lined up for a hit against the boards in the D-zone.
PIONK - kinda the opposite of DeAngelo. Felt like he had a bit of a rough start, and then found his groove. Does get knocked out of the play a bit in the D-zone early on, but recovered well. Was a significant part of the excellent possession engine in the last period.
GRAVES - not as impressive as his first game, but still impressive. Love his combo of skill and physicality. Felt like he missed a couple of chances (including the goal against), but also made some difference making plays in the D-zone.
PAVALEC - no major complaints, but gave up two goals in two periods and didn't make any wowza saves. Acceptable for a backup, but not worthy of the top tier.
BEREGLAZOV - rough start; didn't even notice him the second period (did he play?); a positive in the third. Essentially, left me wanting to see him in his next game. Get the sense he'll start in HFD and be the first call up.
Expected to be cut:
DESHARNAIS - I know people like him, and the speed is a positive, but I just see a placeholder.
CAREY - will be a GREAT AHLer for us. Has many positive tools (strength, shot, hockey IQ), but doesn't really keep up with the NHL game. Don't mind him as the first call-up; worried about our season if he's playing significant minutes.
PUEMPEL - had some good moments again, but at this stage of his career, there are just too many shifts where nothing happens. Decent candidate to be the 13th forward out of camp.
TAMBELLINI - one or two plays per game where he shows something that give me hope. And he's got great natural gifts. Continue to hope he may have solid 40 pt. 2nd-3rd line potential -- BUT he isn't showing nearly enough to break camp with the team.
STROMWALL - like the speed, but... man, just too many plays where he thinks the puck is in one part of the ice, and it's actually 50-60 feet away and heading in the other direction.
FARNHAM - a couple of nice shifts in a game of mixed quality players where he laid some nice hits, and even made a couple of decent passes, but essentially a reactive thumper as opposed to a player who directed the play on any shift I recall.
KAMPFER - the downside of an 8th D. Played too much, got exposed. Has basic technical skill and understanding of what the coach wants him to do, but is too small and too slow to be anything other than depth. (Which, by the way, kudos, that's a lot better than I can say for my athletic skill!)
