That's your opinion, but honestly I think you're being naive.
And I think you're trying to discuss players you honestly know nothing about. I'm not going to sit here and pretend I know anything about EDM players. I can look into statistics and assess things rationally. That's all I can do. Your opinions neither fall in line with statistical analysis or viewed rational opinions of the players you are assessing.
No one trades a no.1/2 overall pick for that kind of return, and Ekblad's pedigree points very much to a Doughty/Weber level d-man at best, Erik Johnson at worst (who's better than anyone either the Oilers or Flyers have).
It doesn't matter if no one would trade the 1st/2nd overall for Couturier. That's not what we're discussing.
Erik Johnson is not better than Brayden Coburn, and rarely do 1st/2nd overall defensemen live up to their pedigree like centers do. Defensemen in draft are generally a crapshoot. How do I know this? I've done the research and written articles on this very subject.
Kid is the dictionary definition of a blue chip stud d-man prospect. If I had Giroux/Lecavalier/Schenn to play the center position and all I had to give was Couturier to get an Ekblad, I do that all day, every day, and twice on Sundays.
No, you don't. That's stupid. If you have a team that needs defense, the last thing you give up is your best defensive player. Based on player development, even if Ekblad becomes a better overall defensive force than Couturier, he also generally wouldn't accomplish this for a number of years. Defensemen develop a lot slower than most forwards, particularly guys like Couturier, who is for all intents and purposes an anomaly of development. He's way ahead of the curve.
There's zero chance the Oilers would trade Ekblad if they're lucky enough to get him, nor will any team that ends up getting him.
That's not what we're arguing.