GDT: Preseason Game 1: Red Wings at chicago 9/25/24 8:00 pm et

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

OldnotDeadWings

Registered User
Sep 18, 2013
462
556
There’s less offense with Edvinsson than a lot of people want to believe, but this kid should still be a stud, overall. I love his defensive potential.

That's my feeling too. Ed is a different player than Seider, but fundamentally he is similar in that he's a big, mobile 2-way D better defensively than offensively. His stickwork, attention to detail, ability to get possession started are all more advanced than an ability to put up points. Basically a Bouwmeester type more than a Hedman, just like Seider is more a Weber/Langway than a Robinson.

But, we'll see. So much of what Ed ,might contribute offensively in the future is going to depend on his confidence level and usage. Being ASPs partner down the road might not be as conducive to putting up primary points than if he has a Brad Stuart type of partner.
 

Man Purse

Registered User
Dec 16, 2010
760
326
wind river valley
Petry haters where you at?
its hopeless....

I'm passing 1000 games this year
fu-f***-you.gif
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: kook10

jaster

I am become woke, destroyer of ignorance.
Jun 8, 2007
13,655
9,294
Ok, upon replay.... eh, it's hockey. An 18 year old kid trying to make a name for himself decides to take a run at the Wings newly-minted franchise star winger. Not a great idea, but it was an idea. Didn't look like a knee attempt to me, but he was certainly trying to obliterate him. Larkin didn't take kindly to that, nor should he, and in turn took a run at the kid (absolutely has to happen in hockey). Unfortunately, there was minor contact at the blueline and the kid went down to his knees right before Larkin reached him, so it looked like an elbow to the face. Whether it actually was an elbow to the face or not does not matter in the slightest.

In short, when you're a nobody and you take a run at a star player, you're going to reach the 'find out' phase.
 

The Zetterberg Era

Ball Hockey Sucks
Nov 8, 2011
41,178
11,994
Ft. Myers, FL
Ok, upon replay.... eh, it's hockey. An 18 year old kid trying to make a name for himself decides to take a run at the Wings newly-minted franchise star winger. Not a great idea, but it was an idea. Didn't look like a knee attempt to me, but he was certainly trying to obliterate him. Larkin didn't take kindly to that, nor should he, and in turn took a run at the kid (absolutely has to happen in hockey). Unfortunately, there was minor contact at the blueline and the kid went down to his knees right before Larkin reached him, so it looked like an elbow to the face. Whether it actually was an elbow to the face or not does not matter in the slightest.

In short, when you're a nobody and you take a run at a star player, you're going to reach the 'find out' phase.
Completely agree with this.
 

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2004
29,196
28,453
Ok, upon replay.... eh, it's hockey. An 18 year old kid trying to make a name for himself decides to take a run at the Wings newly-minted franchise star winger. Not a great idea, but it was an idea. Didn't look like a knee attempt to me, but he was certainly trying to obliterate him. Larkin didn't take kindly to that, nor should he, and in turn took a run at the kid (absolutely has to happen in hockey). Unfortunately, there was minor contact at the blueline and the kid went down to his knees right before Larkin reached him, so it looked like an elbow to the face. Whether it actually was an elbow to the face or not does not matter in the slightest.

In short, when you're a nobody and you take a run at a star player, you're going to reach the 'find out' phase.

Honestly the biggest issue I have with him taking a run is it looked like he stuck out his elbow to try and catch a piece of Raymond as it was clear he was going to miss.
 

AlwaysSunnyInDetroit

Registered User
Oct 1, 2021
701
1,043
I noticed the play in real-time. The guy took a run at Raymond, then play continued with Chicago trying to bring the puck back into Detroit's zone, another Wing took a run at the Chicago player, kind of clipping him, which cause him to go to his knees and as he was sliding forward (and I think the play was offside or something) Larkin then clipped him high while he was sliding on his knees.

The initial Wing hitting him and then Larkin following it up happened back-to-back, where they were both trying to hit the Chicago player, it's just the other Wing got there first and then Larkin right after.
it was johansson
 

TheOctopusKid

Registered User
Sep 24, 2010
1,436
1,660
That is exactly what Seider needs in a partner. Someone who doesn’t mess around with it. Someone Seider doesn’t have to bail out constantly, like he did Walman.

In my head canon, I kind of expect Johansson to end up Seider's partner by year end not based on "Oh he's an elite 1st Pairing talent", but on the grounds of he's a really smart, all-round, low maintenance partner who can know how to work and complement him in all sorts of different scenarios. More a chemistry, complementary skills thing. I have incredibly high hopes that Johansson ends up being a pretty solid mainstay for us.
 

norrisnick

The best...
Apr 14, 2005
30,710
15,907
In my head canon, I kind of expect Johansson to end up Seider's partner by year end not based on "Oh he's an elite 1st Pairing talent", but on the grounds of he's a really smart, all-round, low maintenance partner who can know how to work and complement him in all sorts of different scenarios. More a chemistry, complementary skills thing. I have incredibly high hopes that Johansson ends up being a pretty solid mainstay for us.
All the more reason Maatta never being tried there is baffling.
 

OneMoreTry

Registered User
Sep 26, 2021
326
233
I like all the pretty colors and how they make it like a videogame, but charts like this where I have absolutely no idea where the data is coming from or how they're arriving at these numbers don't mean a whole lot to me.

Just because you don’t know anything about it, doesn’t mean it‘s wrong (doesn’t mean it’s right, either!)..

..but you know, I get the point in general. I just didn’t like what I saw from that line, I didn’t like it last season, and the chart just looked like it. And yes, that’s biased. ;)

The main reason is, I’m not yet convinced DBC is worth that contract. Or should be on the first line.

Don’t get me wrong, the decision was right at that point to trade/extend and get him, and we wouldn’t have gotten him for less money.. but I don’t like the general setup of two rather smallish wingers in the Top6, and not on the same line, and that being the first line.

For some reason, if that works out, it’s always on other teams and never for us.

And while I see a lot of upside with Ray (who is already better) and like that extension, I don’t think DBC will improve much.

I‘d be happy if he completely proves me wrong, puts up 80 points on Larkins line (no matter who the 3rd guy is) - I just don’t see it. :skeptic:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lazlo Hollyfeld

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2004
29,196
28,453
Just because you don’t know anything about it, doesn’t mean it‘s wrong (doesn’t mean it’s right, either!)..

..but you know, I get the point in general. I just didn’t like what I saw from that line, I didn’t like it last season, and the chart just looked like it. And yes, that’s biased. ;)

The main reason is, I’m not yet convinced DBC is worth that contract. Or should be on the first line.

Don’t get me wrong, the decision was right at that point to trade/extend and get him, and we wouldn’t have gotten him for less money.. but I don’t like the general setup of two rather smallish wingers in the Top6, and not on the same line, and that being the first line.

For some reason, if that works out, it’s always on other teams and never for us.

And while I see a lot of upside with Ray (who is already better) and like that extension, I don’t think DBC will improve much.

I‘d be happy if he completely proves me wrong, puts up 80 points on Larkins line (no matter who the 3rd guy is) - I just don’t see it. :skeptic:

To be clear, that's exactly what I meant. It looks pretty but I have no idea what it's built on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OneMoreTry

Gniwder

Registered User
Oct 12, 2009
14,638
7,901
Bellingham, WA
Did Watson do anything for that piece of sh_t. ?
Nothing needed to be done, DBoss made his point. At that point it's up to the coach to decide. If Watson didn't get the green light from Fester then he's not gonna do anything. He's on a PTO, he's gonna do what the coach tells him to do. Coaches don't want enforcers to freelance, bottom 6 players who take unnecessary penalties get cut quickly.

its hopeless....

I'm passing 1000 games this year
View attachment 909923
I don't get the Petry hate, he's earning his (Red Wings paid) salary at $2.3M. That's bottom pair money for a guy with a lot of experience, and he's better than most 3rd pair D in the league. His cap is less than half as much as Copp, and less than Maatta or Holl. He's also a hometown guy, for some reason Copp gets a free pass and Jeff gets so much hate.

If Fester has to play him on the second pair because Holl sucks, that's Stevie's fault, not Jeff's. Stevie made a mistake by signing Holl to be second pair RHD. 36 YO defenseman who was pretty mediocre in his prime should be getting sheltered 3rd pair minutes. He's capable of doing that.

He'll get his 1000 games wearing red. I would not be surprised at all if he gets extended on a year by year basis for $2M range salary to be #6/7 D like Staal. If AlJo looks good this season, it'll be Maatta that's leaving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lilidk

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
10,632
4,061
Nothing needed to be done, DBoss made his point. At that point it's up to the coach to decide. If Watson didn't get the green light from Fester then he's not gonna do anything. He's on a PTO, he's gonna do what the coach tells him to do. Coaches don't want enforcers to freelance, bottom 6 players who take unnecessary penalties get cut quickly.


I don't get the Petry hate, he's earning his (Red Wings paid) salary at $2.3M. That's bottom pair money for a guy with a lot of experience, and he's better than most 3rd pair D in the league. His cap is less than half as much as Copp, and less than Maatta or Holl. He's also a hometown guy, for some reason Copp gets a free pass and Jeff gets so much hate.

If Fester has to play him on the second pair because Holl sucks, that's Stevie's fault, not Jeff's. Stevie made a mistake by signing Holl to be second pair RHD. 36 YO defenseman who was pretty mediocre in his prime should be getting sheltered 3rd pair minutes. He's capable of doing that.

He'll get his 1000 games wearing red. I would not be surprised at all if he gets extended on a year by year basis for $2M range salary to be #6/7 D like Staal. If AlJo looks good this season, it'll be Maatta that's leaving.
Yzerman was excellent in Tampa, in Detroit he's trying do something else. And yes Detroit pays Petry much less than Holl
 

jkutswings

hot piss hockey
Jul 10, 2014
11,413
9,362
Good and stupid same time in meaningless game
If I'm able to show that nobody is taking a run at my teammate without getting the same treatment, and the worst thing that can happen is that I miss one or more meaningless preseason games, I'll take that trade any day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaster

ShanahanMan

Registered User
Jan 31, 2009
3,031
1,670
Tokyo, Japan
Yzerman was excellent in Tampa, in Detroit he's trying do something else. And yes Detroit pays Petry much less than Holl
He’s trying to build a team close to St Louis during their cup run. Lacking in top end skill but full of big bodies and grit. He’s been pretty outspoken about this.

I’ve be pretty vocal that I don’t agree with the approach as well. Having big bodies is important, but speed i think is the biggest X factor in today’s NHL.
 

lilidk

Registered User
Mar 4, 2008
10,632
4,061
If I'm able to show that nobody is taking a run at my teammate without getting the same treatment, and the worst thing that can happen is that I miss one or more meaningless preseason games, I'll take that trade any day.
True, but we're talking about our best player, who could also can get injured
 

jaster

I am become woke, destroyer of ignorance.
Jun 8, 2007
13,655
9,294
True, but we're talking about our best player, who could also can get injured
He won’t get injured retaliating against someone. He’ll get injured when players run him, which they do regardless of whether he retaliates against other players or not. Doing what he did on Wednesday does not increase his injury risk.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad